This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-gloucestershire-23955074

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Second badger cull believed to have begun in Gloucestershire Second badger cull believed to have begun in Gloucestershire
(about 1 hour later)
A badger cull in Gloucestershire is believed to have begun - a week after the first stage of the government pilot started in Somerset. More than 100 anti badger-cull protestors spent the night in west Gloucestershire aiming to witness or disrupt the government pilot scheme.
Gloucestershire Police said its badger cull policing operation was at "full capacity" from 20:00 BST on Tuesday but no arrests had been made. The National Farmers' Union (NFU) refused to confirm the cull had started in the county.
About 5,000 badgers are expected to be killed in controlled shootings over six weeks in a bid to curb bovine TB. But BBC West of England correspondent John Kay said all the indications were that the shooting of badgers had begun.
Gloucestershire Police said its operation to keep the peace was under way.
About 5,000 badgers are to be shot over six weeks in a bid to curb bovine TB.
The pilot cull got under way in Somerset last week, but no-one involved will say how many badgers have been shot or killed.
The culls aim to assess if culling can be done effectively, safely and humanely, with plans to roll out the scheme more widely in areas which are hotspots for TB in cattle.
Charles Mann, chairman of the NFU in Gloucestershire, said tackling TB in wildlife made sense.
"We're not exterminating badgers, just reducing their numbers so we have healthy cattle and badgers," said Mr Mann.
Anti-cull protesters have vowed to disrupt the shootings.Anti-cull protesters have vowed to disrupt the shootings.
More than 100 campaigners gathered in Gloucestershire, with observers monitoring the cull zone for signs of shooting. They want the emphasis to be on vaccines and tighter on-farm and cattle movement measures.
'Even-handed' Tony Dean, chairman of the Gloucestershire Badger Group, said: "They've started in Somerset, and [the Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs] say they are having 'good results', but no-one is coming out with any figures."
Drew Pratten, from Stop the Cull, said the group was confident it could prevent the cull taking place, adding: "We're as ready as we will ever be to stop it by getting between the setts and the pre-baiters." Drew Pratten, of the Stop the Cull protest group, said it was confident it could prevent the cull taking place, adding: "We're as ready as we will ever be to stop it by getting between the setts and the pre-baiters."
A Gloucestershire Police spokesman said the cull was a Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) policy that was being implemented by private companies under licence by Natural England. A Gloucestershire Police spokesman said: "Our role will be operationally independent, impartial, even-handed and fair to everyone whatever their views, interest or involvement in the pilot scheme."
He added: "Our role will be operationally independent, impartial, even-handed and fair to everyone whatever their views, interest or involvement in the pilot scheme."
Initially the pilot will not examine how successful culling has been in reducing the spread of TB to livestock.Initially the pilot will not examine how successful culling has been in reducing the spread of TB to livestock.
Instead, it will test whether the cull can be carried out "effectively, humanely and safely".
No-one involved in the cull will say how many badgers have so far been shot or killed.
The government has said the cull is necessary and could make a meaningful contribution to controlling TB in cattle.
Campaigners have fought the plans since the test areas were revealed last year. They argue a cull is unnecessary, inhumane and ineffective in controlling the disease.Campaigners have fought the plans since the test areas were revealed last year. They argue a cull is unnecessary, inhumane and ineffective in controlling the disease.