This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2013/sep/06/lalit-modi-guilty-misconduct-bcci

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Lalit Modi found guilty of eight counts of misconduct by Indian cricket body Lalit Modi found guilty of eight counts of misconduct by Indian cricket body
(12 days later)
Indian cricket's governing body, the BCCI, has found Lalit Modi guilty of eight charges of misconduct which could see the former commissioner of the Indian Premier League given a life ban from the sport.Indian cricket's governing body, the BCCI, has found Lalit Modi guilty of eight charges of misconduct which could see the former commissioner of the Indian Premier League given a life ban from the sport.
The charges, relating to financial irregularities, bid-rigging and administrative matters during his tenure in charge of the country's lucrative Twenty20 league are detailed in a 133-page report submitted by the BCCI's disciplinary committee this week, which will be discussed at a special general meeting on 25 September.The charges, relating to financial irregularities, bid-rigging and administrative matters during his tenure in charge of the country's lucrative Twenty20 league are detailed in a 133-page report submitted by the BCCI's disciplinary committee this week, which will be discussed at a special general meeting on 25 September.
It is believed that a life ban for Modi will be recommended and accepted at the meeting.It is believed that a life ban for Modi will be recommended and accepted at the meeting.
In his reaction to the report, Modi pointed out several flaws in both the procedure and the findings, claiming members of the committee were biased against him and that he had not been given enough time to submit his defence.In his reaction to the report, Modi pointed out several flaws in both the procedure and the findings, claiming members of the committee were biased against him and that he had not been given enough time to submit his defence.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.