This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24029706

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Police Taser use more than doubles - Home Office Police Taser use more than doubles - Home Office
(35 minutes later)
Police use of Tasers in England and Wales more than doubled between 2009 and 2011, according to Home Office figures.Police use of Tasers in England and Wales more than doubled between 2009 and 2011, according to Home Office figures.
The devices were used 7,877 times in 2011, compared with 3,328 in 2009.The devices were used 7,877 times in 2011, compared with 3,328 in 2009.
In only around a quarter (25.7% in 2011) were they actually discharged. In most situations they were used in preparation or as a warning. In only about a quarter (25.7% in 2011) were they actually discharged. In most situations they were only readied or pointed as a warning.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission is probing 12 Taser-related incidents, three involving deaths.The Independent Police Complaints Commission is probing 12 Taser-related incidents, three involving deaths.
Tasers were first trialled in 2004 and their use has since been rolled out to all forces in England and Wales. Officers are required to take a training course before being allowed to use a Taser and they are told only to deploy them when threatened with violence.Tasers were first trialled in 2004 and their use has since been rolled out to all forces in England and Wales. Officers are required to take a training course before being allowed to use a Taser and they are told only to deploy them when threatened with violence.
Human rights group Amnesty International said it was "concerned" about the figures and called for only a small number of officers to be allowed to use the weapons.Human rights group Amnesty International said it was "concerned" about the figures and called for only a small number of officers to be allowed to use the weapons.
"The increasing roll out of Tasers across the UK is a grave concern. Amnesty International is worried about every bobby on the beat having a Taser on their belt - it's not a modern truncheon," said the group's UK director Kate Allen. "The increasing rollout of Tasers across the UK is a grave concern. Amnesty International is worried about every bobby on the beat having a Taser on their belt - it's not a modern truncheon," said the group's UK director Kate Allen.
"A Taser doesn't just give a little tingle - it's a potentially lethal 50,000-volt weapon and should not be spoken of as some sort of 'natural progression' of the standard policing kit.""A Taser doesn't just give a little tingle - it's a potentially lethal 50,000-volt weapon and should not be spoken of as some sort of 'natural progression' of the standard policing kit."
'Serious weapons' 'Public concern'
Her concerns were echoed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which expressed particular worry about the use of Tasers in direct contact with someone's body.Her concerns were echoed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which expressed particular worry about the use of Tasers in direct contact with someone's body.
The commission said that it received 68 complaints about Taser use by police in 2010, a figure which rose to 101 in 2011 but fell slightly to 98 last year. The commission said that it had received 68 complaints about Taser use by police in 2010, a figure which rose to 101 in 2011 but fell slightly to 98 last year.
IPCC deputy chair Deborah Glass said: "The IPCC recognises that there is public concern over the considerable increase in Taser use not only in the number of officers using it but also in circumstances where it would not have been used previously - and a rise in complaints that has accompanied that. IPCC deputy chair Deborah Glass said: "The IPCC recognises that there is public concern over the considerable increase in Taser use, not only in the number of officers using it but also in circumstances where it would not have been used previously - and a rise in complaints that has accompanied that.
"We do have concerns about some of the ways and circumstances in which the Taser is used, bearing in mind that each use must be justified as being necessary and proportionate to the perceived threat."We do have concerns about some of the ways and circumstances in which the Taser is used, bearing in mind that each use must be justified as being necessary and proportionate to the perceived threat.
"The IPCC is currently independently investigating 12 cases and supervising police investigations into a further seven cases involving the use of Taser.""The IPCC is currently independently investigating 12 cases and supervising police investigations into a further seven cases involving the use of Taser."
Those comments came as Association of Chief Police Officers issued its own guidance discouraging the use of Tasers at point blank range. Acpo believes the use of the weapon in "drive-stun" mode - when it is jabbed into someone - often serves only to antagonise the victim further. But the Association of Chief Police Officers pointed out that the percentage of occasions when the Taser was fired had not increased over the years.
But president of the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales Irene Curtis said using Tasers can mean fewer officers and members of the public may be hurt. Spokesman Simon Chesterman said he believed this was evidence of the "extensive and consistent training" which police had implemented.
"Officers are trained to use Taser to deal with violence or threats of violence and they are individually accountable in law for the amount of force they use," he said.
And president of the Police Superintendents' Association of England and Wales, Irene Curtis, said using Tasers could mean fewer officers and members of the public were hurt.
"It is not a surprise that the number of deployments has increased because the number of people with access to Tasers has increased in that time," she said."It is not a surprise that the number of deployments has increased because the number of people with access to Tasers has increased in that time," she said.
"We support the roll out of Tasers. We think it's a really useful tool that officers can use and can help reduce injuries to the public and to police officers. "We support the rollout of Tasers. We think it's a really useful tool that officers can use and can help reduce injuries to the public and to police officers.
Red-dotted
"A Taser used appropriately can reduce the amount of time that officers need to have off because it reduces injuries. It reduces harm to the public because if there's a dangerous individual, they can be restrained more quickly."A Taser used appropriately can reduce the amount of time that officers need to have off because it reduces injuries. It reduces harm to the public because if there's a dangerous individual, they can be restrained more quickly.
"And sometimes the only other option is firearms. A Taser isn't a gun. A Taser can in some circumstances cause less harm than striking someone with a baton.""And sometimes the only other option is firearms. A Taser isn't a gun. A Taser can in some circumstances cause less harm than striking someone with a baton."
Red-dotted
The Home Office figures showed that the total deployment of Tasers increased each year from 3,128 in 2009, to 6,649 in 2010 and 7,877 in 2011.The Home Office figures showed that the total deployment of Tasers increased each year from 3,128 in 2009, to 6,649 in 2010 and 7,877 in 2011.
It further broke down its figures to show what percentage of the deployments involved the weapon being discharged and not discharged. It further broke down its figures to show what percentage of the deployments involved the weapon being "discharged" and "not discharged".
The former group included firing the weapon and using it to "drive-stun". Uses in the latter were drawing and aiming the weapon. It also included occasions on which it was arced, which means sparking it without having a target, and red-dotted, which refers to using the targeting mechanism without firing. Incidents where a Taser was used but "not discharged" include when the weapon was drawn and aimed; when it was "arced" - which means sparking it without having a target; and when it was "red-dotted" - which means using the targeting mechanism without firing.
Non-discharges represented 75% of the total deployments for both 2010 and 2011. The percentage figures provided by the Home Office suggest that discharges increased from around 850 in 2009, to around 1,650 in 2010 and around 2,050 in 2011. Most of those cases when a Taser was "discharged" involved the Taser being fired - where the probes are shot towards the target still attached to the weapon by copper wiring. It can also be used to "drive stun" - where it is held against the target's body.
Most of those cases involved the Taser being fired - where the probes are shot towards the target still attached to the weapon by copper wiring. The use of "drive-stunning" grew by one percentage point to 5% in 2011. The percentage figures provided by the Home Office suggest that discharges increased from around 850 in 2009, to around 1,650 in 2010 and around 2,050 in 2011.
The use of "drive-stunning" grew by one percentage point to 5% of all uses from 2010 to 2011.
Acpo has recently issued new guidance discouraging the use of Tasers at point-blank range. It believes the use of the weapon in "drive-stun" mode often serves only to antagonise the victim further.