This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/30/world/middleeast/dueling-narratives-in-iran-after-breakthrough-in-us-relations.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Dueling Narratives in Iran After Breakthrough in U.S. Relations Dueling Narratives in Iran Over U.S. Relations
(about 9 hours later)
Iran’s foreign minister said on Sunday said that there was a “real chance” to reach an agreement with the United States over his country’s nuclear program, as long as Washington was prepared to end sanctions and recognize Tehran’s right to peaceful nuclear enrichment. Iran’s foreign minister said on Sunday that there was a “real chance” to reach an agreement with the United States over his country’s nuclear program, as long as Washington was prepared to end sanctions and recognize Tehran’s right to peaceful nuclear enrichment.
Even as the foreign minister, Javad Zarif, was making his comments on American television, his deputy in Iran, seeking to reassure hard-liners in that country, said Tehran would never fully trust the United States. Even as the country’s American-educated foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, was making his comments on ABC’s “This Week,” his deputy in Iran, seeking to reassure hard-liners there, said Tehran would never fully trust the United States.
The dueling narratives underscored the complexity of any rapprochement between the two countries, despite a series of unexpected breakthroughs in relations in recent weeks culminating in a historic phone call last week between President Obama and Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, the first time the country’s leaders have spoken directly since 1979. The dueling narratives underscored the complexity of any rapprochement between the two countries, despite a series of unexpected public and private exchanges in recent weeks culminating in a historic phone call Friday between President Obama and Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani.
With both sides staking out their positions ahead of possible negotiations, Mr. Zarif said the nuclear issue was a crucial impediment to improved relations between Iran and the United States, but he added that the “first steps” toward resolving it had been taken. While Mr. Zarif is widely believed to have the backing of the country’s supreme leader to at least give negotiations a try, hard-liners among the Iranian leadership are watching warily and could try to derail an agreement.
“The resolution of that issue will be a first step, a necessary first step toward removing the tensions and doubts and misgivings that the two sides have had about each other for the last 30-some years,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.” With both the United States and Iran staking out their positions ahead of new negotiations scheduled for mid-October in Geneva, Mr. Zarif said the nuclear issue was a crucial impediment to improved relations between Iran and the United States. But he added that the “first steps” toward resolving it had been taken.
To be successful, Mr. Zarif said, the United States and Iran must move forward “within an atmosphere of mutual respect and mutual interest.” “The resolution of that issue will be a first step, a necessary first step toward removing the tensions and doubts and misgivings that the two sides have had about each other for the last 30-some years,” he said.
A crucial demand of Iran, he said, was the removal of the international sanctions that have damaged the country’s economy. In exchange, he said, Iran would be willing to open its nuclear facilities to inspections. But even as Mr. Zarif expressed cautious optimism, the points of possible conflict between the two countries were made clear again Sunday.
“What is necessary is for the two sides to sit together and reach a common objective,” he said. A crucial demand of Iran, he said, was the removal of the international sanctions that have damaged the country’s economy. In exchange, he said, Iran would be willing to open its nuclear facilities to inspections. He did not address the sequence in which the actions would need to be taken, or the reluctance of both nations to seem to be making the first major move.
The United States will undoubtedly demand that Iran grant international inspectors access to all of its nuclear facilities as a key element in any deal. Secretary of State John Kerry, in an interview with “60 Minutes” scheduled to be broadcast on Sunday evening, said Iran should immediately open its heavily fortified Fordo nuclear center to inspections. On a different talk show, “Fareed Zakaria GPS” on CNN, Susan Rice, the national security adviser, said sanctions would remain until the United States and its allies were convinced Iran was not pursuing nuclear weapons. But like Mr. Zarif, she did not discuss how a lifting of sanctions could be conducted or how much of its nuclear infrastructure Iran would have to dismantle.
The center, which is buried deep underground and largely impervious to a missile strike, was discovered by the West in 2009. Mr. Kerry said the Iranians could also offer to stop enriching uranium above a certain level. In his comments on Sunday, Mr. Zarif signaled that Iran would be prepared to allow inspections, including unannounced ones, so long as they did not come in the form of demands from the United States.
In his comments on Sunday, Mr. Zarif signaled that Iran would be prepared to meet those concessions as long as they did not come in the form of demands.
“We are willing to engage in negotiations,” he said. “Of course, the United States also needs to do certain things very rapidly.”“We are willing to engage in negotiations,” he said. “Of course, the United States also needs to do certain things very rapidly.”
His statement that Iran’s “right to enrich is nonnegotiable” also pointed toward a difference with the U.S. that is more than merely semantic. So far the United States has said only that the Iranians have a right to nuclear energy. The Iranians say that implies a right to enrich uranium; the West has previously negotiated deals, which ultimately fell apart, to provide Iran with nuclear fuel in a form that would be more difficult to weaponize.
In Tehran, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, sought to assure conservative factions that Iran remained skeptical of Washington and would not rush headlong into a deal.In Tehran, Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, sought to assure conservative factions that Iran remained skeptical of Washington and would not rush headlong into a deal.
“Definitely, a history of high tensions between Tehran and Washington will not go back to normal relations due to a phone call, meeting or negotiation,” Mr. Araghchi was quoted as saying by the semiofficial Fars news agency, according to The Associated Press. “Definitely, a history of high tensions between Tehran and Washington will not go back to normal relations due to a phone call, meeting or negotiation,” Mr. Araghchi was quoted as saying by the semiofficial Fars news agency.
“We never trust America 100 percent,” he added. “And, in the future, we will remain on the same path.”“We never trust America 100 percent,” he added. “And, in the future, we will remain on the same path.”
The tensions over the recent breakthroughs were evident in Iran over the weekend. On Saturday, dozens of protesters threw eggs and a shoe at Mr. Rouhani upon his return from an annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations in New York. It was there, while driving to Kennedy International Airport on Friday, that Mr. Rouhani and Mr. Obama spoke by phone. The tensions over the recent breakthroughs were evident in Iran over the weekend. On Saturday, dozens of protesters threw eggs and a shoe at Mr. Rouhani upon his return from an annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations in New York.
At the protest in Tehran, groups of hard-liners surrounded Mr. Rouhani’s car, shouting, “Our people are awake and hate America!” At the protest in Tehran, hard-liners surrounded Mr. Rouhani’s car, shouting, “Our people are awake and hate America!”
Asked to explain such statements on Sunday, Mr. Zarif said the Iranian people hated American policies, not the American people.Asked to explain such statements on Sunday, Mr. Zarif said the Iranian people hated American policies, not the American people.
“American people are nice, peace-loving, generous people who come to the aid of people in need all over the world, and this is what we respect and have a lot of admiration for,” he said.“American people are nice, peace-loving, generous people who come to the aid of people in need all over the world, and this is what we respect and have a lot of admiration for,” he said.
But the policies of the American government, he said, have “unfortunately been the source of instability in our region for many years.”But the policies of the American government, he said, have “unfortunately been the source of instability in our region for many years.”

Michael Schwirtz reported from New York, and David E. Sanger from Washington.