This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24545294

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Prisoner votes Supreme Court decision expected UK inmates lose right to vote ruling
(34 minutes later)
The Supreme Court will decide later whether prisoners have the right to vote under European Union rules - even though they cannot under British law. The Supreme Court has dismissed appeals from two prisoners over the right to vote under European Union rules.
Two prisoners - one from England and one from Scotland - say that EU law gives them a right to vote. The prisoners - one from England and one from Scotland - argued that EU law gives them a right to vote - even though they cannot under British law.
The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has already told the UK to end the blanket ban on prisoners voting. Prime Minister David Cameron said on Twitter that the ruling was "a great victory for common sense".
The European Court of Human Rights has previously told the UK to end the blanket ban on prisoners voting.
Parliament is considering legislation, but hasn't yet decided what to do.Parliament is considering legislation, but hasn't yet decided what to do.
Convicted prisoners in the UK are banned from voting on the basis that they have forfeited that right by breaking the law and going to jail.Convicted prisoners in the UK are banned from voting on the basis that they have forfeited that right by breaking the law and going to jail.
Successive governments have wanted to maintain that position but the ECHR said a blanket ban on prisoners voting was disproportionate. Successive governments have wanted to maintain that position but the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) said a blanket ban on prisoners voting was disproportionate.
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court will rule on two related cases in which prisoners say that separate European Union law and treaties trump the UK ban - meaning that inmates have a right to vote in local, European and potentially Scottish Parliamentary elections.
Peter Chester raped and strangled his niece in Blackpool in 1977 and was jailed for life for her murder. He has served his minimum term but the Parole Board has refused to release him because it says he is too dangerous.Peter Chester raped and strangled his niece in Blackpool in 1977 and was jailed for life for her murder. He has served his minimum term but the Parole Board has refused to release him because it says he is too dangerous.
In 2008, he tried to join the electoral roll so that he could vote in the elections for the European Parliament. The Ministry of Justice said he could not until the law was changed.In 2008, he tried to join the electoral roll so that he could vote in the elections for the European Parliament. The Ministry of Justice said he could not until the law was changed.
In the second case, George McGeoch, serving life in a Scottish prison, argued that EU law allowed him to vote in local and European elections.In the second case, George McGeoch, serving life in a Scottish prison, argued that EU law allowed him to vote in local and European elections.
Although the ECHR has already told the UK to change the law, these two cases focus on whether prisoners as EU citizens have a right to vote even if Westminster says differently. Although the ECHR has already told the UK to change the law, these two cases focused on whether prisoners as EU citizens have a right to vote even if Westminster says differently.
Last year, the government conceded that it would have to change the law to allow some prisoners to vote.Last year, the government conceded that it would have to change the law to allow some prisoners to vote.
Ministers have published a draft bill which is being considered by Parliament. The proposals include limiting the vote to inmates who are serving either less than six months or four years.Ministers have published a draft bill which is being considered by Parliament. The proposals include limiting the vote to inmates who are serving either less than six months or four years.
A further 2,352 inmates have tried to bring voting cases to the European Court of Human Rights. Those applications are adjourned while judges wait to see what Westminster does.A further 2,352 inmates have tried to bring voting cases to the European Court of Human Rights. Those applications are adjourned while judges wait to see what Westminster does.