This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/16/six-soldiers-died-fireball-patrol-afghanistan
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Major defends decision to send out on patrol six soldiers who died in fireball | |
(about 3 hours later) | |
An army major has defended his decision to order a patrol in Afghanistan that ended with six men being killed when their armoured vehicle was turned into a "fireball" by a huge roadside bomb. | |
The patrol was delayed by a sandstorm and did not take place until the early evening but Major Edward Colver told the men's inquest it was important to send the Warrior vehicle out to keep the enemy on the "back foot". | |
Just minutes after leaving the base in Helmand, the Warrior drove over an improvised explosive device (IED). Colleagues who rushed to try to help the men described hearing ammunition ignite in the Warrior and listened helpless as bullets ricocheted around inside the vehicle. | |
The tragedy in March last year remains the biggest single loss of life for British forces in Afghanistan apart from an RAF Nimrod crash in 2006 in which 14 died. The deaths of the six men took the toll of British fatalities in Afghanistan past the 400 mark and re-focused attention on the reason for UK troops being in the country. | |
The hearing in Oxford was told on Wednesday that one of the soldiers who died, Christopher Kershaw, 19, was only on board because he had volunteered at the last minute to take a colleague's place. | |
Kershaw died alongside Sergeant Nigel Coupe, 33, Corporal Jake Hartley, 20, and Privates Anthony Frampton, 20, Daniel Wade, 20, and Daniel Wilford, 21. | |
The patrol had been due to go out at 4pm but was delayed by two and a half hours due to a sandstorm. Colver said that later, when he was deciding whether to send the patrol, he had no concerns about visibility. | |
He said it was "standard operating procedure" to try to send a patrol out after a period when troops had not been able to see what was happening in the area. | |
Asked by lawyer Michael Davison, representing members of three of the soldiers' families, why he had decided to send out the patrol at that time and not the following day, he said: "You have to constantly keep the insurgents on the back foot. | |
"We hadn't been out from the morning until late afternoon. If I hadn't sent that patrol out, we wouldn't have had anyone out for around 20 hours. I deemed that too long." | |
Colver said the soldiers were taught to look for "groundsign" – indications of possible IEDs – but it was difficult because of the terrain, which he compared to the surface of the moon, and dust thrown up by the vehicle. | |
The inquest heard it was most likely that all the men were either killed or knocked unconscious by the huge blast, and unaware of what happened afterwards. It was also told that at the time the threat of attack from IEDs in the area was deemed low. | |
A soldier in the vehicle behind, Private Luke Stones, said he heard a "large explosion" just five minutes after leaving the base. "Around 20m to my front was a large fireball which had flames reaching around it. I stood staring at the fireball not really understanding what I was looking at." | |
The inquest was held as the Ministry of Defence named the 445th UK service member to have died since operations in Afghanistan began in October 2001. | |
Lance Corporal James Brynin, of the Intelligence Corps, was shot dead when his patrol was attacked in Helmand. | |
The inquest continues. | |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |
Previous version
1
Next version