This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/world/europe/european-court-rules-against-spain-on-terror-sentences.html
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| European Court Rules Against Spain on Terror Sentences | European Court Rules Against Spain on Terror Sentences |
| (34 minutes later) | |
| MADRID — The European Court of Human Rights ruled on Monday against a Spanish law that has allowed the Madrid government to extend the imprisonment of convicted terrorists and members of ETA, the Basque separatist group. | MADRID — The European Court of Human Rights ruled on Monday against a Spanish law that has allowed the Madrid government to extend the imprisonment of convicted terrorists and members of ETA, the Basque separatist group. |
| The court, in Strasbourg, ruled on the case of one ETA member, Inés del Río Prada, who had appealed against her prolonged prison stay. She was imprisoned in 1989 for taking part in the deadly bombing of a bus carrying police officers. The European court ordered that she be released immediately and receive 30,000 euros, or about $41,000, in damages to cover legal costs. | |
| The precedent set by the ruling is likely to be extended to other prisoners. While the government refused on Monday to specify how many prisoners could be involved, Jorge Fernández Díaz, Spain’s interior minister, said last year that 40 of about 500 ETA members held in Spanish prisons could claim to face a situation comparable to that of Ms. del Río Prada. | The precedent set by the ruling is likely to be extended to other prisoners. While the government refused on Monday to specify how many prisoners could be involved, Jorge Fernández Díaz, Spain’s interior minister, said last year that 40 of about 500 ETA members held in Spanish prisons could claim to face a situation comparable to that of Ms. del Río Prada. |
| Basque activists have long called for the government to show leniency toward ETA prisoners as an important good-will gesture and a step toward bringing to a close a 45-year conflict that has claimed more than 800 victims, killed by ETA in its pursuit of independence for a Basque nation. On Monday, about 500 people gathered in the center of the Basque city of Bilbao to welcome the European ruling, shouting “ETA prisoners go home.” | |
| However, the government dismissed on Monday any suggestion that it would revise its prison policies and dealings with ETA as a result of a ruling that it insisted applied only to Ms. del Río Prada. | |
| “The policy of the government won’t change,” Mr. Fernández Díaz said in a televised news conference. “We will continue until we achieve the definite dissolution of ETA. | |
| In October 2011, ETA announced that it would end four decades of violence with “the definite cessation of its military activity.” ETA is listed as a terrorist organization by the United States and the European Union, but it has been considerably weakened in recent years after the arrests of its main leaders, to the point that the Spanish government describes ETA as almost operationally defunct. | |
| Still, Madrid has refused to consider ETA’s cease-fire as a sufficient act of surrender, saying that it would continue to hunt down ETA members, in cooperation with the French and other European security forces, until the group handed over all its weaponry. | Still, Madrid has refused to consider ETA’s cease-fire as a sufficient act of surrender, saying that it would continue to hunt down ETA members, in cooperation with the French and other European security forces, until the group handed over all its weaponry. |
| Human rights experts welcomed the ruling, which follows a similar decision in July 2012 by the lower chamber of the Strasbourg court, which the Madrid government appealed. | Human rights experts welcomed the ruling, which follows a similar decision in July 2012 by the lower chamber of the Strasbourg court, which the Madrid government appealed. |
| “This ruling should serve as a notice to Spain to correct continuing aberrations of justice in the name of fighting terrorism, such as incommunicado detention and limited rights of defense for terrorism suspects,” said Judith Sunderland, who covers Spain for Human Rights Watch. “Separatist violence is no excuse for the state to violate fundamental rights, which have only served to deepen grievances.” | “This ruling should serve as a notice to Spain to correct continuing aberrations of justice in the name of fighting terrorism, such as incommunicado detention and limited rights of defense for terrorism suspects,” said Judith Sunderland, who covers Spain for Human Rights Watch. “Separatist violence is no excuse for the state to violate fundamental rights, which have only served to deepen grievances.” |
| However, addressing the news media alongside the interior minister, Justice Minister Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón deplored the ruling and the fact that the European court had decided to override the views of both the Spanish Supreme Court and its Constitutional Court. | |
| Mr. Ruiz Gallardón said it was now time for Spain’s national court to study the consequences of the European ruling, including whether Ms. del Río Prado should be released immediately, as demanded by the Strasbourg court. | Mr. Ruiz Gallardón said it was now time for Spain’s national court to study the consequences of the European ruling, including whether Ms. del Río Prado should be released immediately, as demanded by the Strasbourg court. |
| Mr. Ruiz Gallardón said, “The fight against terrorism that started 40 years ago and that we have won will continue with utter firmness.” | |
| After her arrest and trial for the bus bombing, Ms. del Río Prada received a 3,000-year prison sentence. But under normal Spanish legislation that limits a prison sentence to 30 years, she would have become eligible for parole in July 2008. | After her arrest and trial for the bus bombing, Ms. del Río Prada received a 3,000-year prison sentence. But under normal Spanish legislation that limits a prison sentence to 30 years, she would have become eligible for parole in July 2008. |
| The government ensured that she would be kept in prison based on a legal precedent stemming from a 2006 ruling by the Spanish Supreme Court that has allowed the government to restrict parole for some inmates, applying any benefits for good prison behavior to the full sentencing term rather than the 30-year limit. | |
| In its ruling on Monday, the European court found that Spain had breached the European Convention on Human Rights, notably because the precedent was applied retroactively to the sentencing of Ms. del Río Prada. | In its ruling on Monday, the European court found that Spain had breached the European Convention on Human Rights, notably because the precedent was applied retroactively to the sentencing of Ms. del Río Prada. |