This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/22/go-home-vans-scrapped-failure

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
'Go home' vans to be scrapped after experiment deemed a failure 'Go home' vans to be scrapped after experiment deemed a failure
(about 4 hours later)
Theresa May has confirmed to MPs that the Home Office's controversial "go home" vans are not going to be extended nationwide, after a pilot study in London found them "too much of a blunt instrument". Theresa May yesterday admitted that the Home Office's controversial "go home" vans had been "too much of a blunt instrument", as she confirmed they would not be extended nationwide.
She said there were some returns on the experiment but politicians should be willing to say if something was not working. The Home Office came under fire for using the ads, displayed on billboards carried by vans in six London boroughs, reading, "In the UK illegally? Go home or face arrest."
The full evaluation will be published shortly but it is believed that only one illegal immigrant agreed to go home and that was as a result of reading about the vans in the Guardian. In comments to MPs, May said she had studied an evaluation of the campaign and concluded it should not be taken further. "Politicians should be willing to step up to the plate and say when they think something actually hasn't been as good an idea, and I think they were too blunt an instrument."
She said the experiment trialled in parts of London in July was not going to be extended during the second reading of the immigration bill. The vans warned illegal immigrants to go home or face arrest. The full evaluation will be published shortly but it is believed that only one illegal immigrant agreed to go home and that was a result of reading about the vans in the Guardian.
The decision is a blow to Mark Harper, the immigration minister, who said last week on BBC1's Question Time that they might be extended. May had always been more reluctant to embrace the idea, including at home affairs select committee last week. She said the experiment trialled in parts of London in July was not going to be extended during the second reading of the immigration bill.
The decision led to another row on Tuesday between the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives on responsibility for the decision to scrap the scheme. The decision is a blow to Mark Harper, the immigration minister, who said last week on BBC1's Question Time the venture might be extended. May had always been more reluctant to embrace the idea, including when before the home affairs select committee last week.
The Lib Dem president, Tim Farron, tweeted "we did it", as other party sources claimed that Norman Baker, the new home office minister, had pressed for the Go Home vans not to be extended. The decision led to another row between the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives on responsibility for the decision to scrap the scheme.
Farron said: "It is right that this pilot scheme is scrapped and that these vans will not been seen on our streets again. The Lib Dem president, Tim Farron, tweeted "we did it", as other party sources claimed that Norman Baker, the new Home Office minister, had pressed for the trials not to be extended.
"The vans represented the worst kind of divisive politics and it seems only one immigrant went home because of them. This is a failed project and the Home Office should hold their hands up and admit it was wrong both practically and morally. Farron said: "It is right that this pilot scheme is scrapped and that these vans will not been seen on our streets again. The vans represented the worst kind of divisive politics and it seems only one immigrant went home because of them. This is a failed project and the Home Office should hold their hands up and admit it was wrong both practically and morally.
"It is important that our borders are protected and secure but this policy – driving a van around some of the most diverse communities in London – is not the way to deliver that.""It is important that our borders are protected and secure but this policy – driving a van around some of the most diverse communities in London – is not the way to deliver that."
Liberal Democrats said that they opposed the vans as a matter of principle. But Conservative sources said the decision had been taken by May after an evaluation showed the vans had not been effective in persuading illegal immigrants to leave the country. Liberal Democrats said that they opposed the vans as a matter of principle. But Conservative sources said the decision had been taken by May after the evaluation showed the vans had not been effective in persuading illegal immigrants to leave the country.
The business secretary, Vince Cable, had described the vans as stupid.The business secretary, Vince Cable, had described the vans as stupid.
Julian Huppert, a Liberal Democrat home affairs committee member, said the vans had demonised people that legitimately were in the country. Julian Huppert, a Liberal Democrat home affairs committee member, said the vans had demonised people who were in the country legitimately.
Gavin Barwell, the Conservative MP for Croydon, praised May's announcement, saying it is "the right decision not to continue ad vans aimed at illegal migrants", adding there were much better ways of tackling illegal migration. Gavin Barwell, the Conservative MP for Croydon, praised May's announcement, saying it was "the right decision not to continue ad vans aimed at illegal migrants", adding there were much better ways of tackling illegal migration.
Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper branded the vans a divisive gimmick. The project was a complete failure that was beneath May and "ought to be beneath this government".
Cooper insisted that Labour's plans on immigration, which include trebling the maximum fine for employing illegal workers to �£30,000, were a contrast to the government's "gimmicks" such as text messages and "offensive" advertising vans.
"The government is failing to address the exploitation of low-skilled immigration in the labour market. Nor do they have any serious strategy for tackling illegal immigration.
"That's why we are setting out sensible and practical policies, instead of the Tory-led Government approach of resorting to ineffective and offensive ad vans, gimmicks or incorrect text messages to people who have lived here for 30 years."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.