This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/oct/22/co-op-boss-peter-marks-bank-meltdown
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Former Co-op boss refuses to take blame for bank meltdown | Former Co-op boss refuses to take blame for bank meltdown |
(about 5 hours later) | |
The Co-operative Group promised a radical overhaul of its boardroom on Tuesday just hours after the former boss of the grocery and funeral care business deflected responsibility for the crisis at its bank which has fallen under the control of hedge funds. | |
Peter Marks was accused of "selective amnesia", being "gung-ho", "out of his depth", and in "complete denial" during a heated appearance before the Treasury select committee of MPs at the former boss of the UK's largest mutual, described the fate of the bank as a "tragedy". Marks's appearance came as the Co-op Group's chairman, Len Wardle, announced that he is quitting to clear the way for a successor to be appointed from outside the mutual movement. | |
The decision by Len Wardle to step aside from next May was said to not be related to Marks' appearance before MPs but is significant, signalling a shift from the traditional boardroom composition of the Co-op and the potential for cultural change. The board is made up of 20 members of the movement and Wardle, a former university fellow, has been chairman since 2007. | |
Mark's appearance before MPs came 24 hours after the Co-op Group had to admit it was ceding control of its bank – for which Marks had once harboured huge ambitions - to hedge funds. The Co-op -– which spans funeral homes, grocers and pharmacies - will be left with just 30% ownership after the deal with hedge funds to plug a £1.5bn capital gap in the bank. | |
Marks, who left in May after 45 years, was greeted with incredulity by MPs as he repeatedly refused to take personal responsibility for the bank's problems. He said Co-op was not "Peter Marks plc" or a "dictatorship" and described how his job was not like running a plc as he did not have a seat on the Co-op Group board and could not have changed the way the mutual, founded in 1844, was run. | |
In a blow to his successors, he cast doubt upon their assertions that Co-op bank can maintain its ethical stance despite the involvement of hedge funds. | |
"It's not a co-op is it?," he said | |
"Hedge funds are there to maximise profit, that's what their sole purpose in life is. To be truly ethical you cannot do that," Marks told Labour MP Pat McFadden. | |
Marks said the intervention of the US hedge funds – Silver Point and Aurelius – could be a "good thing" for the wider Co-op Group and that he warned the Co-op Group board that they "were stretching their capital and still do". | |
"How many businesses try to be major bank, major pharmacy, major food retailer, major funeral director?" he said. | |
MPs grew frustrated as his reluctance to take responsibility for the bank's merger with Britannia Building Society in 2008 –now blamed for many of the losses – and the aborted attempt to buy 632 branches from Lloyds Banking Group which collapsed in April. | |
"A lack of personal accountability at senior levels, ineffective corporate governance and insufficient experience and expertise among those taking the decisions; this has become a familiar story," said Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the committee, which will take evidence next week from former bank boss Barry Tootell. | |
Marks said the Britannia deal had been overseen by David Anderson, who ran the Co-op bank at the time and the Britannia boss Neville Richardson, who ran the enlarged entity before leaving in 2011. | |
He stressed he was only a non-executive director on the bank's board. "We do all have to take some responsibility but I was not approved by the Financial Services Authority to run a bank." Marks said work by KPMG had been relied upon to agree the Britannia deal. | |
"I can't take responsibility for something I wasn't in full control of, which was the bank. I wasn't driving the Britannia deal but I absolutely voted for it when it was proposed," said Marks. "Should we have merged with Britannia building society? If we had a crystal ball of course we wouldn't." | |
Pressed by MPs who repeatedly asked if the deal was a disastrous error, Marks said: "Disastrous error is harsh. Certainly it was an error." Marks said he was "feeling very sad" and the problems at the bank were a "tragedy". | |
"It's a tragedy what's happened, for the group, for the movement, for me personally," Marks told MPs. | "It's a tragedy what's happened, for the group, for the movement, for me personally," Marks told MPs. |
In often confusing evidence, Marks eventually conceded that Richardson had left the bank during a "disagreement" about the capacity to buy the Lloyds branches – code-named Verde – and an internal management programme known as Unity. | |
Marks defended the Verde deal which would have transformed the bank on the high street, agreeing that he was the "driving force". But still Marks frustrated MPs by refusing to take personal responsibility and was accused of "selective amensia" when he failed to remember a warning about Co-op's capital by Lloyds in December 2012 – four months before the deal fell apart. | Marks defended the Verde deal which would have transformed the bank on the high street, agreeing that he was the "driving force". But still Marks frustrated MPs by refusing to take personal responsibility and was accused of "selective amensia" when he failed to remember a warning about Co-op's capital by Lloyds in December 2012 – four months before the deal fell apart. |
At the time Marks blamed the economy for the failed deal – the capital hole was exposed two months later – and told MPs that the bank was a "victim" of the financial services crash. | |
Asked whether there had been political interference to do the Verde deal – as has been asserted by failed bidders for the branches – Marks replied: "Not that I'm aware of." | Asked whether there had been political interference to do the Verde deal – as has been asserted by failed bidders for the branches – Marks replied: "Not that I'm aware of." |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |
Previous version
1
Next version