This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/oct/23/energy-industry-competition-test-cameron

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Energy industry faces proper competition test, says David Cameron Energy bills pushed up by green tariffs, says David Cameron
(34 minutes later)
The government is to launch a proper competition test to establish whether the energy market can be made more competitive, David Cameron said. David Cameron has pledged to roll back the £112 annual costs of green tariffs on energy bills, as he came under fire over Sir John Major's call for a windfall tax on the excess profits of Britain's big six energy companies.
Announcing the move at prime minister's questions, Cameron also signalled he wanted to get to grips with green regulations, which were driving up energy bills. As Ed Miliband mocked the prime minister in the wake of Major's call for state intervention on energy proces, Cameron announced an annual competition review to examine the cost of green regulations and the level of profits.
"I can tell the House today that we will be having a proper competition test carried out over the next year to get to the bottom of whether this market can be made more competitive," he said. The PM said: "I can tell the house today that we will be having a proper competition test carried out over the next year to get to the bottom of whether this market can be more competitive. I want more companies, I want better regulation, I want better deal for consumers. But yes we also need to roll back the green charges that he put in place as energy secretary."
Cameron's intervention came after former prime minister Sir John Major called on the government to impose a windfall tax on the profits of the energy companies. The review, which will be carried out by the Office of Fair Trading and the new Competition and Markets Authority, is to be announced next week in the annual energy statement. George Osborne is to announce any changes to levies in his autumn statement.
Challenged about Major's remarks by the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, Cameron said: "I want more companies, I want better regulation, I want better deals for consumers. But yes, we also need to roll back the green charges that he put in place as energy secretary." Downing Street said after prime minister's questions that he is determined to roll back the costs of green levies. But government figures showed that the largest proportion of the £112 highlighted by Cameron are aimed specifically at less affluent people.
His comments threatened to put him at odds with his Liberal Democrat coalition partners who have made clear they are firmly opposed to any move to get rid of existing green tariffs. This may place Cameron on a further collission course with Major who said in his speech on Tuesday that the government needed to make sure that less well off people do not face a choice between deciding whether to pay for heating or eating.
Amid heated exchanges, Cameron lashed out at the Labour leader, telling him: "Sir John Major is a good man, you are acting like a con man." The government figures show that £50 goes on the energy company obligation – which supports energy efficiency in poorer households. A further £11 goes towards the warm homes discount which is designed to help with the costs of fuel bills for poorer households. The other charges are meeting the UK's renewable obligations (£30), the EU's emissions trading scheme (£8), the carbon price floor (£5), feed-in tariffs (£7) and smart meters (£3). These come to £114, slightly more than the £112 identified by the prime minister. Labour pointed out that £67 of the £112 was introduced by the coalition.
He said: "He left us a market with just six players, we have already seen seven new energy companies come into that market. The PM announced the review as Miliband said that Major's call for a windfall on the profits of energy companies showed that No 10 has misjudged the mood of the nation by appearing to rule out state intervention.
"So we need an annual audit of competition to make this market more competitive, something he never did when in office. Cameron dismissed Miliband as a "con man" after pledging to introduce a 20-month price freeze if he wins the election, prompting a rebuke from the commons speaker John Bercow for using unparliamentary language.
"And we need to roll back the costs that have been imposed on people's energy bills, part of which he was responsible for." But Cameron showed that Major had hit a nerve when he announced the review of the level of profits and the impact of the cost of green regulations. He said: "We need to recognise there are four bits to an energy bill. There are the wholesale prices which are beyond our control. There are the costs of transmission and the grid which are difficult to change. There are the profits of the energy companies and there are the green regulations. It is those last two that we need to get to grips with."
The PM was later rebuked by Speaker John Bercow for calling Miliband a con man. The PM told the rightwing backbencher Brian Binley that he was targeting £112 on bills. "We have to have an honest discussion about this. On our energy bills is £112 of green taxes and green regulations. We need to work out what is necessary to encourage renewable energy, what is necessary to go on winning overseas investment into the UK but how we can bear down on people's bills.
"It simply is the politics of the con man to pretend that you can freeze prices when you are not in control of global energy prices. The proper approach is to look at what is driving up bills and deal with it."
Miliband mocked the PM for inconsistency. "He really is changing his policy every day of the week. It is absolutely extraordinary. His energy secretary [the Liberal Democrat Ed Davey], who is in his place, says it has nothing to do with green taxes, 60% of the green taxes were introduced by him. And who is the man who said vote blue to go green? It was him. I tell you what's weak. It's not standing up to the energy companies and that is this prime minister all over."
Miliband opened by saying that it was difficult for Cameron to dismiss his call for state intervention after Major's call for a windfall tax. The Labour leader said: "The prime minister said that anyone who wanted to interven in energy markets was living in a Marxist universe. Can he tell the house how does he feel now that the red peril has claimed Sir John Major?"
Bercow interrupted the proceedings to criticise the prime minister for describing Miliband as a con man. He said: "Let me just say. I let it go the first time … 'con man' is frankly unparliamentary. The prime minister is a man of great versatility in the use of language. It is a bit below the level. We'll leave it at that."
The PM's spokesman denied claims of a coalition rift because ministers agreed on the need to tackle the cost of living. The spokesman said: "One way or the other the prime minister is determined to roll back green leivies. There have been discussions about more targeted support since George Osborne's speech on 9 September."
A Labour spokesman said: "The prime minister is clearly on the defensive over energy prices. He is refusing to take real action to tackle overcharging now. He wants to take over a year to come up with proposals at a time when bills are going up 10%."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.