This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24746137

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Press regulation: Papers lose Privy Council injunction bid Press regulation: Papers lose Privy Council injunction bid
(35 minutes later)
Newspaper publishers have lost a bid to stop ministers going to the Privy Council later to seek the Queen's approval for a royal charter on UK press regulation.Newspaper publishers have lost a bid to stop ministers going to the Privy Council later to seek the Queen's approval for a royal charter on UK press regulation.
At the High Court, publishers argued the Privy Council had not considered their own rival charter fairly.At the High Court, publishers argued the Privy Council had not considered their own rival charter fairly.
But two judges refused them an injunction and said there were no grounds for a judicial review.But two judges refused them an injunction and said there were no grounds for a judicial review.
The publishers are considering a challenge to the Court of Appeal later. The publishers have said they are to appeal against the court's ruling.
Following the phone-hacking affair and subsequent Leveson Inquiry into the ethics and practises of newspapers, politicians and the press drew up their own charters.Following the phone-hacking affair and subsequent Leveson Inquiry into the ethics and practises of newspapers, politicians and the press drew up their own charters.
Both propose a "recognition panel" to oversee a press self-regulation committee with powers to impose fines of up to £1m on newspapers for wrongdoing.Both propose a "recognition panel" to oversee a press self-regulation committee with powers to impose fines of up to £1m on newspapers for wrongdoing.
The press charter would require industry-wide approval for any amendments, while the politicians' version - backed by the three mainstream parties - could be changed by a two-thirds majority in Parliament.The press charter would require industry-wide approval for any amendments, while the politicians' version - backed by the three mainstream parties - could be changed by a two-thirds majority in Parliament.
Some in the media claim this could let governments encroach on press freedom.Some in the media claim this could let governments encroach on press freedom.
Commenting on the court's ruling, a Department for Culture Media and Sport spokesman said: "We are clear the process for considering the industry royal charter was robust and fair and the courts have agreed. Culture Secretary Maria Miller said: "Both the press and the government think that the best way forward is for us to have self-regulation of the press and the principles for that are set out in a royal charter.
"We can now get on with implementing the cross-party charter. "The decisions today mean that we can move forward with that and we will continue to work with the industry to make sure this is a success.
"A royal charter will protect freedom of the press whilst offering real redress when mistakes are made. "The most important thing is that we retain the freedom of the press which is such an important part of our democratic process but that we have a way of giving people redress if there have been mistakes and errors made and I think that's a shared objective between the press and the government."
"Importantly, it is the best way of resisting full statutory regulation that others have tried to impose. 'Good for journalism'
"We will continue to work with the industry, as we always have, and recent changes secured by the culture secretary, to arbitration, the standards code and the parliamentary lock will ensure the system is workable." In a joint statement, the newspapers said: "We are deeply disappointed with this decision, which denies the newspaper and magazine industry the right properly to make their case that the Privy Council's decision to reject their charter was unfair and unlawful.
'Inflicting misery' "This is a vital constitutional issue and we will be taking our case for judicial review - of the Privy Council's decisions on both the industry charter and the cross-party charter - to the Court of Appeal."
Earlier, Roger Alton, executive editor of the Times, said: "The idea that somehow a deal stitched up between a few politicians over pizzas and a handful of lobbyists from Hacked Off, which is essentially an anti-newspaper group, the idea that such a deal is the thing that now controls the press, which is one of the most vital safeguards in our democracy, I find extraordinarily depressing, very sad... It will be resisted." Earlier, Roger Alton, executive editor of the Times, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "The idea that somehow a deal stitched up between a few politicians over pizzas and a handful of lobbyists from Hacked Off, which is essentially an anti-newspaper group, the idea that such a deal is the thing that now controls the press, which is one of the most vital safeguards in our democracy, I find extraordinarily depressing, very sad... It will be resisted."
The Privy Council, whose active members must be government ministers, meets in private to formally advise the Queen to approve "Orders" which have already been agreed by ministers.The Privy Council, whose active members must be government ministers, meets in private to formally advise the Queen to approve "Orders" which have already been agreed by ministers.
The BBC's media correspondent David Sillito said the royal charter was expected to go before the Privy Council at 17:30 GMT so there was still time for an appeal to be made before then. The BBC's media correspondent David Sillito said the royal charter was expected to go before the Privy Council at 17:30 GMT.
A senior industry source told our political correspondent, Ross Hawkins, that the papers were meeting lawyers and considering whether to appeal, but no decision had been made yet.
Hacked Off's executive director Brian Cathcart said: "The royal charter is good for journalism, good for freedom of speech, and - vitally - good for the public.Hacked Off's executive director Brian Cathcart said: "The royal charter is good for journalism, good for freedom of speech, and - vitally - good for the public.
"What Mr Murdoch and his friends are clinging to is the right to lie, twist, bully and intrude, inflicting misery on innocent people. That has to stop.""What Mr Murdoch and his friends are clinging to is the right to lie, twist, bully and intrude, inflicting misery on innocent people. That has to stop."
Standards codeStandards code
Paul Connew, former editor of the Sunday Mirror, said: "This is not simply about the big national newspapers. This is being supported by over 1,000 local and regional newspapers and by the entire magazine world in fact.
"So, at the end of the day, this could be a royal charter that no-one is signing up to. What happens next?"
Under the royal charter, the Press Complaints Commission would be replaced by a new regulator with greater powers, and a watchdog - the recognition panel - which will check the regulator remains independent.Under the royal charter, the Press Complaints Commission would be replaced by a new regulator with greater powers, and a watchdog - the recognition panel - which will check the regulator remains independent.
The regulator, set up by the press but without any editors on the board, will draw up a standards code and can impose fines of up to £1m.The regulator, set up by the press but without any editors on the board, will draw up a standards code and can impose fines of up to £1m.
It will also provide a speedy arbitration service to deal with complaints.It will also provide a speedy arbitration service to deal with complaints.
The recognition panel will be made up of between four and eight members, none of whom can be journalists, civil servants or MPs.The recognition panel will be made up of between four and eight members, none of whom can be journalists, civil servants or MPs.
Media organisations will be free to sign up or stay outside the new system of regulation.Media organisations will be free to sign up or stay outside the new system of regulation.