This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/06/world/asia/biden-faults-china-on-foreign-press-crackdown.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Biden Faults China on Foreign Press Crackdown China Pressures U.S. Journalists, Prompting Warning From Biden
(about 9 hours later)
BEIJING — Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. has taken up the cause of foreign correspondents facing banishment from China for unwelcome news coverage, publicly criticizing the Chinese government’s tactics and privately raising the issue with President Xi Jinping. BEIJING — China appears ready to force nearly two dozen journalists from American news organizations to leave the country by the end of the year, a significant increase in pressure on foreign news media that has prompted the American government’s first public warning about repercussions.
On the third day of his weeklong trip to Asia, Mr. Biden met Thursday with China-based journalists from news organizations affected by the crackdown, most notably The New York Times and Bloomberg News, to hear their concerns and describe his efforts on their behalf. Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. raised the issue here in meetings with President Xi Jinping and other top Chinese leaders, and then publicly chastised the Chinese on Thursday for refusing to say if they will renew the visas of correspondents and for blocking of the websites of American-based news media.
Reporters in the meeting said Mr. Biden told them that he had warned Mr. Xi, in a formal session and over dinner, that there would be repercussions for China, especially in the United States Congress, if it forced out journalists. But he said the Chinese leader appeared unmoved, insisting that the authorities treated reporters according to Chinese law. “Innovation thrives where people breathe freely, speak freely, are able to challenge orthodoxy, where newspapers can report the truth without fear of consequences,” Mr. Biden said in a speech to an American business group.
The Chinese government has held up visa renewals for roughly two dozen correspondents from The Times and Bloomberg after the news organizations published investigative articles about the wealth of the families of top Chinese leaders. With their visas expiring by the end of 2013, the reporters will be forced to leave China — the first in about two weeks. At a meeting on Thursday with Beijing-based reporters from The New York Times and Bloomberg, Mr. Biden said that he warned Chinese leaders, in a formal session and over dinner, that there would be consequences for China, especially in the Congress, if it forced out the journalists. But he said Mr. Xi appeared unmoved, insisting that the authorities treated reporters according to Chinese law.
In a speech to American businessmen and women here a day after he met with Mr. Xi and other Chinese leaders, the vice president said the United States and China had many disagreements, but at the moment, one of the most profound was over China’s treatment of American journalists. Between them, The Times and Bloomberg have nearly two dozen journalists whose visas are up for renewal by the end of the month, and China has declined to act on them.
“I believe China will be stronger and more stable and more innovative if it respects universal human rights,” Mr. Biden said. “Innovation thrives where people breathe freely, speak freely, are able to challenge orthodoxy, where newspapers can report the truth without fear of consequences.” The growing tension with China over its treatment of American news media outlets comes at a moment when Washington and Beijing are increasingly at odds and publicly more critical of each other than at any time in recent memory.
The Chinese foreign ministry said Thursday that it managed foreign reporters “according to law and regulations.” A spokesman, Hong Lei, said, “Over the years, we have provided a very convenient environment for foreign correspondents to conduct interviews in China.” The Obama administration has refused to recognize China’s recently declared “Air Defense Identification Zone” over disputed territory with Japan — a subject that dominated Mr. Biden’s visit — and the countries have sparred over what Washington regards as the organized daily intrusion into United States government and industry computer systems by Chinese entities, mostly to steal intellectual property. A two-day summit meeting earlier in June between President Obama and Mr. Xi, intended to calm the tensions, was followed by a series of actions that have accentuated the rivalry between the world’s established superpower and its fastest-rising competitor.
“As for foreign correspondents’ living and working environments in China,” Mr. Hong added, “I think as long as you hold an objective and impartial attitude, you will arrive at the right conclusion.” The Chinese foreign ministry, responding to Mr. Biden, said Thursday that it managed foreign reporters “according to law and regulations.” A spokesman, Hong Lei, said, “As for foreign correspondents’ living and working environments in China, I think as long as you hold an objective and impartial attitude, you will arrive at the right conclusion.”
While China has long harassed and even expelled reporters whose coverage displeased the authorities, correspondents here said the latest tactics represented a marked escalation. Privately, Chinese officials have told reporters that they are linked to news coverage. Chinese officials have all but said that American reporters know what they need to do to get their visas renewed: tailor their coverage.
The reprisals appear to be aimed at entire news organizations rather than individual reporters. In the most extreme cases — The Times and Bloomberg — the moves threaten to effectively shut down the organizations’ China news bureaus, as well as harm their business operations in the country. The New York Times has been in regular contact with the Obama administration on the issue; with time running out on the current visas for its correspondents, repeated efforts to obtain new ones have so far been unsuccessful.
The English- and Chinese-language websites of The Times have been blocked in China since October 2012, after the paper published an extensive article on the wealth and business dealings of the family of Wen Jiabao, China’s former prime minister. Jill Abramson, The Times’s executive editor, said in an interview that “unfettered coverage of China is a crucial issue” and that she was determined to continue “the highest quality journalism about China,” whether or not the visas were renewed. Asked about the Chinese argument that its authorities were enforcing laws that apply to all journalists in China, she noted, “Our laws make clear there is respect for freedom of expression.”
A correspondent for The Times, Chris Buckley, was forced to leave Beijing at the end of 2012 when the authorities declined to renew his visa. He continues to work for The Times from Hong Kong. The paper has also been unable to obtain accreditation for its Beijing bureau chief, Philip P. Pan, who applied for a visa in March 2012. A spokesman for Bloomberg News declined to comment.
“Unfettered coverage of China is a crucial issue,” Jill Abramson, the executive editor of The Times, said in a statement. “At a time when China is such an important and compelling story, the world needs the highest-quality reporting on it.” Over the decades, there have been periodic crackdowns on news organizations in China. But the pressure has increased since China emerged as the world’s second-largest economy, and scrutiny of its government and business practices — and Western-style investigative reporting — has led the Chinese government to both protest and threaten foreign news organizations.
Bloomberg’s English-language website was blocked after it published an article in June 2012 on the fortunes amassed by relatives of President Xi. Sales of Bloomberg terminals dried up in China and the government issued no further residency visas to Bloomberg reporters. Chinese officials have privately told reporters that the refusal to deal with their visa applications was linked to their reporting. Mr. Biden intervened during his trip, his aides said, partly out of a concern that Beijing might be trying to drive entire news bureaus — including The Times and Bloomberg — out of the country and harm their business prospects in one of the world’s most booming news markets.
Pressure from Beijing, some Bloomberg employees said, played a role in its decision not to publish a subsequent article investigating the ties between Wang Jianlin, one of China’s wealthiest men, and Communist Party leaders. Bloomberg’s editor in chief, Matthew Winkler, has said the article was not published because it was not ready. Tensions worsened last year, after The Times and Bloomberg ran extensive stories about the wealth accumulated by the families of China’s leaders. In Washington, Chinese diplomats have also complained about coverage of Tibet, the 2008 Olympics in Beijing and reports linking units of China’s People’s Liberation Army to cyberattacks.
On Monday, Chinese authorities denied a Bloomberg reporter entry to a joint press statement with Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain and China’s premier, Li Keqiang. Mr. Cameron’s office protested to Chinese officials, who said the decision was made based on limited space in the room and denied that Bloomberg had been singled out. In his public comments, Mr. Biden offered no specifics about what kind of retaliation the United States government was considering.
A Bloomberg reporter was allowed to attend a similar statement with Mr. Biden and President Xi on Wednesday. A spokeswoman for Bloomberg in Singapore, Belina Tan, declined to comment on the status of its reporters or on the vice president’s intervention on their behalf. But in interviews over several weeks, American officials have acknowledged that their options for pressuring the Chinese are limited. While they could cancel the visas of Chinese correspondents, one administration official said “that could be counterproductive, because we want more reporting about the United States to become available in China.”
In the meeting with Mr. Biden, held at the Press Club Bar in the St. Regis Hotel, the reporters stressed the urgency of their situation. Several said they believed that Mr. Biden had registered a strong protest with Mr. Xi and that it might make a difference. China, some noted, has in the past delayed visas as a pressure tactic but issued them at the last minute. Visa approvals for Chinese news media executives trying to visit the United States could be slowed, officials say, or the administration could initiate trade actions in response to China’s decision to block the English and Chinese-language websites of Western news organizations. Yet so far there appears to have been little work done on preparing such actions, and it is unclear whether it would succeed. American officials, for example, were stymied on how to help Google after it dropped its practice of censoring its own search-engine results, after a Chinese-originated hacking attack on the company. Its share of the Chinese search market has plummeted to 3 percent.
Still, the Chinese government, they said, has become less concerned about cultivating good relations with the foreign press — a trend that became pronounced after the 2008 Olympics, when Chinese officials were angered by what they saw as negative coverage. Bloomberg’s English-language website was blocked after it published an article in June 2012 on the fortunes amassed by relatives of Mr. Xi. Sales of Bloomberg terminals dried up in China, and the government issued no further residency visas to Bloomberg reporters. Pressure from Beijing, some Bloomberg employees said, played a role in its decision not to publish a subsequent article investigating the ties between Wang Jianlin, one of China’s wealthiest men, and Communist Party leaders. Bloomberg’s editor in chief, Matthew Winkler, has insisted the article was not published because it was not ready.
Reporters declined to comment on the record because Mr. Biden’s office asked that the meeting be kept private. The New York Times asked the vice president to intercede on its behalf, with time running out and repeated efforts to obtain visas unsuccessful. The Times’s website, including its Chinese-language edition, has been blocked since October 2012, when the paper published stories about the enormous wealth accumulated by the family of Wen Jiabao, then in his last months as China’s prime minister. Traffic to the Chinese-language site has dropped substantially, the company has said, though a growing number of Chinese have learned to evade the electronic blockades.
For all of Mr. Biden’s efforts, there is little the Obama administration can do. The State Department has raised the issue of visas and even weighed reciprocal action against Chinese journalists seeking to come to the United States. Last month, the authorities also blocked access to an online Chinese-language lifestyle magazine started weeks earlier by The Times after the paper reported that JPMorgan Chase had paid $1.8 million to a consultancy secretly run by Mr. Wen’s daughter, Wen Ruchun, and that American prosecutors were examining ties between Ms. Wen and the bank as part of a bribery investigation. The government also stopped processing the visa applications of The Times’s journalists in China after that report.
But the administration has a broad agenda with China, as Mr. Biden’s visit demonstrated. On Thursday, he kept up the public pressure on China over its declaration of an air defense zone in the contested waters of the East China Sea, drawing fierce protests from Japan. While the United States has periodically intervened on behalf of specific journalists whose visas were denied or who were detained after visiting sensitive places or dissidents, Mr. Biden’s comments were the first time a senior American leader had publicly accused the Chinese of aiming at entire journalistic institutions. Until now, such issues have usually been dealt with quietly.
Mr. Biden urged China to refrain from steps that would raise tensions, and said the Chinese needed to communicate better with their neighbors to avoid accidents or miscalculation. His decision to go public was a reflection, officials said, of the far more aggressive posture China has taken toward foreign journalists over the past two or three years. To some degree that reflects a shift in Chinese diplomacy: In the late 1980s and early 1990s, when Japan began its slow decline and a large international press corps began to migrate to Beijing and Shanghai, the Chinese often attempted to woo foreign reporters.
“I was very direct about our firm position and our expectations in my conversation with Mr. Xi,” he said. The turn can be traced to 2008, when many Chinese objected to foreign reporting of protests in Tibet, and what Chinese authorities felt was negative news media coverage of the 2008 Olympics, an event China saw as its coming-out party as the world’s rising great power. New, ad hoc restrictions began to be imposed, especially after 2011, when the Communist Party leadership feared that the Arab uprisings could sow unrest in China, and security authorities cracked down. “It’s looking increasingly like as a media company you have a choice in China: You either do news or you do business,” said James McGregor, chairman of Greater China for APCO Worldwide, a consultancy, and former Beijing bureau chief for The Wall Street Journal. “But it’s hard to do both.”

Mark Landler reported from Beijing, and David E. Sanger from Washington. Ed Wong contributed reporting from Washington.