This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/dec/10/volcker-rule-us-banks-curb-risky-trading

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US set to adopt Volcker rule to curb banks' risky trading US set to adopt Volcker rule to curb banks' risky trading
(about 5 hours later)
US regulators are set on Tuesday to approve a rule to rein in risky trading by banks, a crucial part of their efforts to reform Wall Street and prevent another costly taxpayer bailout. US regulators are due on Tuesday to approve a rule to rein in risky trading by banks, a crucial part of their efforts to reform Wall Street and prevent another costly taxpayer bailout.
The Volcker rule, named after former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, who championed the reform, prohibits banks from betting on financial markets with their own money, a practice known as proprietary trading.The Volcker rule, named after former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker, who championed the reform, prohibits banks from betting on financial markets with their own money, a practice known as proprietary trading.
The rule, which has now mushroomed into 800 pages, will also bar them from owning more than 3% of hedge funds or private equity funds.The rule, which has now mushroomed into 800 pages, will also bar them from owning more than 3% of hedge funds or private equity funds.
The final version of the crackdown is expected to be tougher than when it was proposed two years ago, after the activities of the 'London Whale' pushed JPMorgan Chase to a $6bn (£3.64bn) loss in 2012, highlighting the perils of speculative trading. The final version of the crackdown is expected to be tougher than when it was proposed after the activities of the "London Whale" pushed JPMorgan Chase to a $6bn (£3.64bn) loss in 2012, highlighting the perils of speculative trading.
Banks worry the rule will erode profits, and make it harder to engage in businesses that are exempt under the law such as hedging against market risks, facilitating client trading – or market-making - and security underwriting. Banks worry the rule will erode profits and make it harder to engage in businesses that are exempt under the law such as hedging against market risks, facilitating client trading – or market-making – and security underwriting.
"The challenge is to prevent the impermissible activities, while promoting the underwriting, the market making, everything that everyone regards as important to financial markets," said Robert Maxant, a partner at Deloitte & Touche."The challenge is to prevent the impermissible activities, while promoting the underwriting, the market making, everything that everyone regards as important to financial markets," said Robert Maxant, a partner at Deloitte & Touche.
The rule is one of the most hotly debated parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform act, aimed at preventing the taxpayer bailouts of large investment banks that happened during the 2007-2009 credit collapse.The rule is one of the most hotly debated parts of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform act, aimed at preventing the taxpayer bailouts of large investment banks that happened during the 2007-2009 credit collapse.
The three US bank regulators, as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, will unveil details of the final rule at 9.30 am New York time (1430 GMT).The three US bank regulators, as well as the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, will unveil details of the final rule at 9.30 am New York time (1430 GMT).
They are then expected to adopt the rule later in the day, although some officials are expected to dissent to the way the final rule is crafted.They are then expected to adopt the rule later in the day, although some officials are expected to dissent to the way the final rule is crafted.
The rule could cost the largest investment banks billions in revenues, and lawyers will be poring over the details of the text to find any weaknesses that would enable them to sue regulators and get the courts to strike down the rule.The rule could cost the largest investment banks billions in revenues, and lawyers will be poring over the details of the text to find any weaknesses that would enable them to sue regulators and get the courts to strike down the rule.
Banks will particularly focus on how strict the requirements are for them to prove that any risky positions they take on are on behalf of clients.Banks will particularly focus on how strict the requirements are for them to prove that any risky positions they take on are on behalf of clients.
In market making, for instance, they have inventories of shares or other securities in order to quickly satisfy client orders, but banks fear new limits on how long they can hold these may make it harder to stock up.In market making, for instance, they have inventories of shares or other securities in order to quickly satisfy client orders, but banks fear new limits on how long they can hold these may make it harder to stock up.
Banks are also worried regulators will clip their wings when it comes to entering risky positions to mitigate financial risk arising in their business, so-called risk hedging.Banks are also worried regulators will clip their wings when it comes to entering risky positions to mitigate financial risk arising in their business, so-called risk hedging.
This can still be done when there is a direct connection to the underlying risk, but banks are used to doing this in multiple and often loosely defined ways - so-called portfolio hedging - and fear this will no longer be allowed. This can still be done when there is a direct connection to the underlying risk, but banks are used to doing this in multiple and often loosely defined ways – so-called portfolio hedging – and fear this will no longer be allowed.
JPMorgan initially explained its London Whale trades as portfolio hedges and regulators have since made it clear the final rule will render such trades impossible.JPMorgan initially explained its London Whale trades as portfolio hedges and regulators have since made it clear the final rule will render such trades impossible.
While the narrowing of the Volcker rule trading exemptions is expected to bite, banks have already wound down their proprietary trading since the crisis.While the narrowing of the Volcker rule trading exemptions is expected to bite, banks have already wound down their proprietary trading since the crisis.
Morgan Stanley in January 2011 said it would spin off its proprietary trading unit Process Driven Trading, which had 60 employees around the world. Morgan Stanley in January 2011 said it would spin off its proprietary trading unit, Process Driven Trading, which had 60 employees around the world.
Goldman Sachs said it had shut down two proprietary trading desks, one known as GSPS and another that did global macro trading, by February 2011. Goldman Sachs said it had shut down two proprietary trading desks, one known as GSPS and another that did global macro trading, by February 2011. Citigroup said it had closed a money-losing proprietary group that had traded stocks.
And Citigroup said it had shuttered a money-losing proprietary group that had traded stocks.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.