This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25322247

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Saatchi finance director says Nigella PA bills 'not scrutinised' Saatchi finance director says Nigella PA bills 'not scrutinised'
(about 1 hour later)
Charles Saatchi's accountant has told a court he did not scrutinise bills for credit cards used by Nigella Lawson's assistants because it was "not my job".Charles Saatchi's accountant has told a court he did not scrutinise bills for credit cards used by Nigella Lawson's assistants because it was "not my job".
Rahul Gajjar, finance director for Ms Lawson's ex-husband, said his team were "there to look after business" and not to check home-spending.Rahul Gajjar, finance director for Ms Lawson's ex-husband, said his team were "there to look after business" and not to check home-spending.
Mr Gajjar was giving evidence at the trial of Francesca, 35, and Elisabetta Grillo, 41. He was giving evidence at Isleworth Crown Court in the trial of Francesca, 35, and Elisabetta Grillo, 41.
The sisters deny fraudulently business credit cards at Isleworth Crown Court. The sisters deny fraudulently using credit cards.
The Grillos' defence has claimed the pair, of Kensington Gardens Square, Bayswater, were allowed to spend by Ms Lawson to cover her use of drugs. The Grillos' defence has claimed the pair, of Kensington Gardens Square, Bayswater, were given permission to use the business cards by Ms Lawson to cover her use of drugs.
Mr Gajjar told the court Coutts cards were issued to the personal assistants after Mr Saatchi decided to use credit cards for all household spending.Mr Gajjar told the court Coutts cards were issued to the personal assistants after Mr Saatchi decided to use credit cards for all household spending.
'Never scrutinised' 'Cheaper on eBay'
"We would look through the summaries [to] see what the general spending would be, but in terms of the detail we wouldn't get involved in 'what's this [or] that for?'""We would look through the summaries [to] see what the general spending would be, but in terms of the detail we wouldn't get involved in 'what's this [or] that for?'"
Anthony Metzer QC, defending Elizabetta Grillo, asked Mr Gajjar if he would have been concerned if a large sum had been spent.Anthony Metzer QC, defending Elizabetta Grillo, asked Mr Gajjar if he would have been concerned if a large sum had been spent.
"If Charles wanted to buy an expensive gift for Nigella, it would not be my job to say 'you could have got it cheaper on eBay'," he said."If Charles wanted to buy an expensive gift for Nigella, it would not be my job to say 'you could have got it cheaper on eBay'," he said.
When questioned whether Mr Saatchi was aware that the cards were not being scrutinised, he said his employer was "well aware that we have never scrutinised his home expenses".When questioned whether Mr Saatchi was aware that the cards were not being scrutinised, he said his employer was "well aware that we have never scrutinised his home expenses".
"It was for the home to consider these expenses," he said."It was for the home to consider these expenses," he said.
The court heard there were a few occasions when Francesca's credit card was declined while on holiday, possibly because it had exceeded its limit, and that she sent Mr Gajjur a text message about it.
He said: "There were a few occurrences where we had to raise the limit because previously he [Mr Saatchi] didn't want the card to be stopped when it involved the house and the children."
Asked if he had considered that Francesca was taking cash out on her credit card, he said: "I don't know if I considered cash", but added that Mr Saatchi and Ms Lawson regularly requested bundles of cash for the home.
The case continues.The case continues.