This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/dec/11/abc-tackles-allegations-of-editorial-bias-using-external-audits
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
ABC to conduct external audit over bias claims | |
(35 minutes later) | |
The ABC is tackling allegations of editorial bias with a new system of external audits, starting with an analysis of the impartiality of all interviews with the then prime minister and opposition leader during the 2013 election campaign. | The ABC is tackling allegations of editorial bias with a new system of external audits, starting with an analysis of the impartiality of all interviews with the then prime minister and opposition leader during the 2013 election campaign. |
In an address to the National Press Club on Wednesday, ABC chairman Jim Spigelman said he had been “concerned” about the frequent allegations of a lack of impartiality at the ABC. | In an address to the National Press Club on Wednesday, ABC chairman Jim Spigelman said he had been “concerned” about the frequent allegations of a lack of impartiality at the ABC. |
“I do not accept that it is systematic, but I do accept that it sometimes occurs,” he said, noting the complaints were usually about programs that represented less than 1% of the corporation’s program hours, but which “happen … to interest the political class most”. | “I do not accept that it is systematic, but I do accept that it sometimes occurs,” he said, noting the complaints were usually about programs that represented less than 1% of the corporation’s program hours, but which “happen … to interest the political class most”. |
He announced the ABC would “produce and publish” a series of editorial audits on particular program topics by people outside its own organisation, on top of internal reviews already undertaken and a “guidance note on impartiality” issued in June. | He announced the ABC would “produce and publish” a series of editorial audits on particular program topics by people outside its own organisation, on top of internal reviews already undertaken and a “guidance note on impartiality” issued in June. |
The first was well advanced. BBC broadcaster Andreea Wills was reporting on “the impartiality of all of the interviews on ABC radio of the then prime minister and then leader of the opposition during the recent election campaign”. The second would consider “the treatment of the debate about asylum seekers”. | |
Spigelman rejected criticism of the ABC’s expansion into online journalism, saying it ignored the realities of modern technology, the competitive impact of the trusted services the broadcaster has always provided and the corporations’ charter which both sides of politics had supported. | Spigelman rejected criticism of the ABC’s expansion into online journalism, saying it ignored the realities of modern technology, the competitive impact of the trusted services the broadcaster has always provided and the corporations’ charter which both sides of politics had supported. |
Liberal politicians, lead by senator Cory Bernardi, and News Corp Australia, have argued the ABC should be prevented from moving into “new media”, with Bernardi arguing the ABC’s online news site should become subscription-based or paid for through advertising because they were “cannibalising” commercial news sites. | Liberal politicians, lead by senator Cory Bernardi, and News Corp Australia, have argued the ABC should be prevented from moving into “new media”, with Bernardi arguing the ABC’s online news site should become subscription-based or paid for through advertising because they were “cannibalising” commercial news sites. |
Spigelman said the ABC’s free content had always created friction with commercial television and radio broadcasters, and the “remorseless imperatives of technology” meant this was now also occurring with traditional print media. | Spigelman said the ABC’s free content had always created friction with commercial television and radio broadcasters, and the “remorseless imperatives of technology” meant this was now also occurring with traditional print media. |
“Some regard this form of competition by a public broadcaster to be ‘unfair’. However, that is the commercial effect of what the ABC has always done over its entire 80-year history. There is nothing fundamentally new here. Nor are the complaints. Nor is the attempt to exercise political influence to restrict us,” he said. | “Some regard this form of competition by a public broadcaster to be ‘unfair’. However, that is the commercial effect of what the ABC has always done over its entire 80-year history. There is nothing fundamentally new here. Nor are the complaints. Nor is the attempt to exercise political influence to restrict us,” he said. |
And he argued it was a “corruption of language” to describe the sale of the ABC as “privatisation” because there were no privately run companies capable of providing the same services. | And he argued it was a “corruption of language” to describe the sale of the ABC as “privatisation” because there were no privately run companies capable of providing the same services. |
“When we privatised public corporations providing banking, electricity, telephone or airline services, no one noticed any difference in the fundamental nature of the services. No one detected a change when they sent or banked a cheque or made a telephone call or flicked a switch. In the case of a ‘privatised’ ABC, the services would be unrecognisable. To use the word “privatise” is an Orwellian corruption of language. A commercial monoculture in the media will either not deliver the broad range of content that public broadcasters have traditionally delivered, or will not deliver such content to the whole community.” | “When we privatised public corporations providing banking, electricity, telephone or airline services, no one noticed any difference in the fundamental nature of the services. No one detected a change when they sent or banked a cheque or made a telephone call or flicked a switch. In the case of a ‘privatised’ ABC, the services would be unrecognisable. To use the word “privatise” is an Orwellian corruption of language. A commercial monoculture in the media will either not deliver the broad range of content that public broadcasters have traditionally delivered, or will not deliver such content to the whole community.” |
Spigelman pointedly described as “a highlight” of the year pre-election amendments to the ABC’s charter – supported by all political parties – which added “digital media services” as a core statutory function and explicitly banned advertising on all digital services. | Spigelman pointedly described as “a highlight” of the year pre-election amendments to the ABC’s charter – supported by all political parties – which added “digital media services” as a core statutory function and explicitly banned advertising on all digital services. |
And he pointed out that the ABC was never intended as a “market failure broadcaster” – just filling gaps in the market – but rather was required by law “to provide programming of wide appeal as well as special interest programming”. | |
“Confining our programming to market failure content would be in breach of our statutory charter,” he said, and would threatened the role of a public broadcaster in promoting social cohesion and debate across the community as a whole. | “Confining our programming to market failure content would be in breach of our statutory charter,” he said, and would threatened the role of a public broadcaster in promoting social cohesion and debate across the community as a whole. |
He also insisted the ABC delivered its services “at reasonable cost” – about $120 per year per household, which compared favourably with the cheapest Foxtel package of $564 a year. | |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |