This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-25401405
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Jeremy Forrest pupil abduction: School 'failed' | Jeremy Forrest pupil abduction: School 'failed' |
(35 minutes later) | |
A serious case review has criticised a school, police and a local authority after a teacher abducted and had sex with a 15-year-old pupil. | A serious case review has criticised a school, police and a local authority after a teacher abducted and had sex with a 15-year-old pupil. |
Jeremy Forrest, 32, who taught at Bishop Bell C of E School in Eastbourne was jailed in June. | Jeremy Forrest, 32, who taught at Bishop Bell C of E School in Eastbourne was jailed in June. |
At his trial, the court heard he groomed the girl before taking her to France in September 2012. | At his trial, the court heard he groomed the girl before taking her to France in September 2012. |
The review found the school "repeatedly failed to see the evidence of the teacher's misconduct". | The review found the school "repeatedly failed to see the evidence of the teacher's misconduct". |
Concerns had been raised following a school trip seven months earlier. | Concerns had been raised following a school trip seven months earlier. |
Concerns 'repeatedly dismissed' | |
The pair had been seen holding hands on a plane, while the girl was 14 years old. | The pair had been seen holding hands on a plane, while the girl was 14 years old. |
In June 2012, the teacher and pupil began a sexual relationship, around the time of the girl's 15th birthday. | In June 2012, the teacher and pupil began a sexual relationship, around the time of the girl's 15th birthday. |
The review by the East Sussex Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB), found that concerns raised by other children at the school were "repeatedly dismissed". | |
"Agencies, and particularly the school, were too ready to dismiss the reports received from other children," the report concluded. | |
"There was, in the school, a sort of 'default position' of intuitively supporting a colleague with a corresponding reluctance to believe that the colleague might be an abuser." | |
The review said the school had also failed to talk to the schoolgirl "in a way that was supportive". | |
The school received further criticism for not involving her mother, and so denying her the opportunity to assist her daughter. | |
Sussex Police was also criticised, with the board saying initial inquiries should have been handled by the child protection team. | |
"The subsequent interviews did not comply with procedural requirements and [the child] and her mother were not seen separately," the report said. | |
The board said: "Children's social care services may have ended their involvement too speedily and that there were weaknesses in how agencies recorded information - in spite of guidance provided by the local authority." | |
Cathie Pattison , chairman of the LSCB, said: "The purpose of any serious case review is to identify what lessons can be learned about the way professionals and organisations work individually and together to safeguard children. | |
"This review has done exactly that and provides a good basis for improving practice and processes. The lessons for the school in this case are actually lessons for all schools to take note of." | |
In June, Forrest was jailed for five and a half years for abduction and having sex with the 15-year-old pupil. |