This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-sussex-25401405

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Jeremy Forrest pupil abduction: School 'failed' Jeremy Forrest pupil abduction: School 'failed'
(35 minutes later)
A serious case review has criticised a school, police and a local authority after a teacher abducted and had sex with a 15-year-old pupil.A serious case review has criticised a school, police and a local authority after a teacher abducted and had sex with a 15-year-old pupil.
Jeremy Forrest, 32, who taught at Bishop Bell C of E School in Eastbourne was jailed in June.Jeremy Forrest, 32, who taught at Bishop Bell C of E School in Eastbourne was jailed in June.
At his trial, the court heard he groomed the girl before taking her to France in September 2012.At his trial, the court heard he groomed the girl before taking her to France in September 2012.
The review found the school "repeatedly failed to see the evidence of the teacher's misconduct".The review found the school "repeatedly failed to see the evidence of the teacher's misconduct".
Concerns had been raised following a school trip seven months earlier.Concerns had been raised following a school trip seven months earlier.
Concerns 'repeatedly dismissed'
The pair had been seen holding hands on a plane, while the girl was 14 years old.The pair had been seen holding hands on a plane, while the girl was 14 years old.
In June 2012, the teacher and pupil began a sexual relationship, around the time of the girl's 15th birthday.In June 2012, the teacher and pupil began a sexual relationship, around the time of the girl's 15th birthday.
One year later, Forrest was jailed for five and a half years for abduction and having sex with a 15-year-old pupil. The review by the East Sussex Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB), found that concerns raised by other children at the school were "repeatedly dismissed".
"Agencies, and particularly the school, were too ready to dismiss the reports received from other children," the report concluded.
"There was, in the school, a sort of 'default position' of intuitively supporting a colleague with a corresponding reluctance to believe that the colleague might be an abuser."
The review said the school had also failed to talk to the schoolgirl "in a way that was supportive".
The school received further criticism for not involving her mother, and so denying her the opportunity to assist her daughter.
Sussex Police was also criticised, with the board saying initial inquiries should have been handled by the child protection team.
"The subsequent interviews did not comply with procedural requirements and [the child] and her mother were not seen separately," the report said.
The board said: "Children's social care services may have ended their involvement too speedily and that there were weaknesses in how agencies recorded information - in spite of guidance provided by the local authority."
Cathie Pattison , chairman of the LSCB, said: "The purpose of any serious case review is to identify what lessons can be learned about the way professionals and organisations work individually and together to safeguard children.
"This review has done exactly that and provides a good basis for improving practice and processes. The lessons for the school in this case are actually lessons for all schools to take note of."
In June, Forrest was jailed for five and a half years for abduction and having sex with the 15-year-old pupil.