This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/dec/16/afghanistan-mission-accomplished-david-cameron

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Mission accomplished in Afghanistan, declares David Cameron Mission accomplished in Afghanistan, declares David Cameron
(about 3 hours later)
David Cameron has declared the mission in Afghanistan will have been accomplished by the time all British troops have been withdrawn at the end of of next year despite fears of a surge of violence from the Taliban around next year's elections. David Cameron has declared the mission in Afghanistan will have been accomplished by the time all British troops have been withdrawn at the end of next year despite fears of a surge of violence from the Taliban around next year's elections.
The prime minister made the bold claim - with echoes of President George Bush's hubristic triumphalism over the Iraq war - as he visited Camp Bastion, the British base in Helmand province, almost exactly a year before all UK fighting troops are due to be withdrawn from the country. The prime minister made the bold claim – with echoes of President George Bush's hubristic triumphalism over the Iraq war – as he visited Camp Bastion, the British base in Helmand province, almost exactly a year before all UK fighting troops are due to be withdrawn from the country.
Almost 6,000 men and women are still serving in Afghanistan in a war that has cost 646 British lives so far. About 6,000 men and women are still serving in Afghanistan in a war that has cost 646 British lives so far.
Asked whether they were coming home with mission accomplished, Cameron said: "Yes I think they do. I think they can come home with their heads held high. You know, we will not leave behind a perfect country or a perfect democracy.Asked whether they were coming home with mission accomplished, Cameron said: "Yes I think they do. I think they can come home with their heads held high. You know, we will not leave behind a perfect country or a perfect democracy.
"You have to remember that Afghanistan is an extremely poor country with a very, very troubled history but I think the purpose of our mission was always to build an Afghanistan and Afghan security forces that were capable of maintaining a basic level of security so this country never again became a haven for terrorist training camps. That has been the most important part of the mission … The absolute driving part of the mission is the basic level of security so that it doesn't become a haven for terror. "You have to remember that Afghanistan is an extremely poor country with a very, very troubled history but I think the purpose of our mission was always to build an Afghanistan and Afghan security forces that were capable of maintaining a basic level of security so this country never again became a haven for terrorist training camps.
"That is the mission, that was the mission and I think we will have accomplished that mission and so our troops can be very proud of what they have done." "That has been the most important part of the mission … The absolute driving part of the mission is the basic level of security so that it doesn't become a haven for terror.
Throughout the year, the UK military will gradually hand over to the 350,000-strong Afghan forces to keep the Taliban insurgents at bay, despite worries over whether the relatively new army and police forces have enough training and equipment to deal with the threat. "That is the mission, that was the mission and I think we will have accomplished that mission and so our troops can be very proud of what they have done." Throughout the year, the UK military will gradually hand over to the 350,000-strong Afghan forces to keep the Taliban insurgents at bay, despite worries over whether the relatively new army and police forces have enough training and equipment to deal with the threat.
It is understood there are particular worries about a surge in violence around the election on 5 April next year, when the long-term president, Hamid Karzai, will hand over to a new leader. The British military is braced for a heightened threat as the Taliban is likely to use this event to mount a campaign against politicians and election observers, with increased risk of assassinations and a slide backwards into violence. It is understood there are particular worries about a surge in violence around the election on 5 April next year, when the long-term president, Hamid Karzai, will hand over to a new leader. The British military is braced for a heightened threat as the Taliban is likely to use this event to mount a campaign against politicians and election observers, with increased risk of assassinations and a slide backwards into violence.
A senior British source said: "The insurgency will have a go. They will still be having goes next year at GiRoA [government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan] officials and at electoral officials but against the very credible and capable Afghan national security force. At the moment the insurgency are just trying to regenerate and reorganise for the next phase." A senior British source said: "The insurgency will have a go. They will still be having goes next year at GIRoA [government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan] officials and at electoral officials but against the very credible and capable Afghan national security force. At the moment the insurgency are just trying to regenerate and reorganise for the next phase."
However, the source stressed that the "summary of where we're at in Helmand is overwhelmingly positive". "The campaign here is on track and the Afghans are in a good place in the short, medium and long term," he said. However, the source stressed that the "summary of where we're at in Helmand is overwhelmingly positive". He said: "The campaign here is on track and the Afghans are in a good place in the short, medium and long term."
Cameron also emphasised that Afghan forces would have lead responsibility for peacekeeping during the elections and insisted Britain would stick to the deadline of bringing out all fighting troops by the end of the year whatever happens.Cameron also emphasised that Afghan forces would have lead responsibility for peacekeeping during the elections and insisted Britain would stick to the deadline of bringing out all fighting troops by the end of the year whatever happens.
"We've been very clear that after the end of 2014 there won't be British troops in a combat role, and there won't be anything like the numbers there are now," he said. Cameron's mission accomplished claim drew criticism from Labour as well as some former diplomats who pointed out that the purpose of the mission has frequently changed from removing Al Qaida's bases, eradicating poppy cultivation, educating girls and helping forge a form of democracy.
"That is what I said in 2010 and we are on that track and we are sticking to that track. What we have done in that time is train up a hugely capable Afghan national army and police force now numbering almost 350,000 and I think more than capable of providing the basic level of security that this country needs. I obviously want a successful Afghan election – it should be another mark along the route towards success for this country and we'll do everything we can to help." William Paytey, UK ambassador to Kabul from 2010-2012, said: "It was an unfortunate use of language because it creates expectations. This is not Iraq. 'Mission Accomplished' suggests that somehow at the end of 2014 that is the end of the story whereas it is actually a way point. Afghanistan has got a long way to go and it could be many decades before we see real peace there."
Cameron could visit the country again next year after the crucial elections. The shadow defence secretary, Vernon Coake, said: "David Cameron should have chosen his words more carefully.
Over the last few months, the prospect of talks with Taliban leaders has been seriously raised for the first time, bringing hopes of a political breakthrough before the drawdown of most troops. "We can be proud of the contribution that Britain's Armed Forces have made and are making in Afghanistan. But the mission is ongoing and our troops will be on the frontline until well in to next year. However, there have been tensions between the Afghan government and the US over how much of a military presence will remain in the country after the end of this year".
However, there have been tensions between the Afghan government and the US over how much of a military presence will remain in the country after this end of this year. Richard Ottaway, chairman of foreign affairs select committee, defended the prime minister: "I think what David Cameron is making perfectly clear is that we went there to rid Afghanistan of Al-Qaida, that has been done; we went there to build capacity to put in police, to put in security forces and to train them, that is job done. So what I think is that we went there for a purpose and we've achieved that purpose".
On Monday, Cameron said he was confident an agreement would be signed.
"It's in Afghanistan's interest to have a basic agreement so that American troops and others can help with basic security all the way up to the transition and provide some support in the future," he said. "That's clearly in Afghanistan's interest, that's in America and Nato's interest too and so I'm confident that after some discussions an agreement will be signed."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.