This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/dec/17/car-insurance-too-high-competition-commission
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Car insurance too high, says Competition Commission | Car insurance too high, says Competition Commission |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| Car insurance premiums are too high and should be reduced through far-reaching reforms, the competition watchdog has said. | Car insurance premiums are too high and should be reduced through far-reaching reforms, the competition watchdog has said. |
| The Competition Commission believes that too many drivers are footing the bill for unnecessary costs incurred during the claims process following an accident. | The Competition Commission believes that too many drivers are footing the bill for unnecessary costs incurred during the claims process following an accident. |
| These costs are initially borne by the insurers of at-fault drivers, but they feed through into increased insurance premiums for all drivers. | These costs are initially borne by the insurers of at-fault drivers, but they feed through into increased insurance premiums for all drivers. |
| The watchdog is also concerned about the relationship between price comparison websites and insurers. | The watchdog is also concerned about the relationship between price comparison websites and insurers. |
| Alasdair Smith, who is leading the investigation, said: "We are now considering a range of possible measures, some of them far-reaching reforms, to ensure that the market better serves the interests of customers." | Alasdair Smith, who is leading the investigation, said: "We are now considering a range of possible measures, some of them far-reaching reforms, to ensure that the market better serves the interests of customers." |
| Smith said that in most cases the party managing the accident claim – typically the non-fault insurer or intermediary – was not the party liable to pay the costs of the claim. | |
| He added: "There is insufficient incentive for insurers to keep costs down even though they are themselves on the receiving end of the problem." | |
| The commission estimates the extra premium costs due to the separation of control and liability on replacement cars and repairs to be between £150m and £200m a year. | |
| It is considering whether to make a driver's own insurer responsible for providing a replacement vehicle or to give at-fault insurers greater opportunity to take control over managing claims. | |
| There may also be caps on the cost of providing a replacement vehicle and on repair costs, as well as compulsory audits of repair quality after the watchdog found that following an accident too many repairs were not completed to the required standard. | |
| Other provisional findings identify problems with the sale of add-on products as it is hard for consumers to find the best-value products. | |
| It said motorists have limited information about add-on insurance products while insurers have point-of-sale advantage. | |
| Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |