This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2013/dec/18/eu-eurozone-banking-crisis-brussels

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
EU in fresh attempt to stave off eurozone banking crisis EU ministers seal banking agreement on eve of Brussels summit
(about 5 hours later)
EU finance ministers are seeking to cobble together a deal over a new system aimed at heading off a renewed eurozone bank crisis , under intense pressure to seal an agreement on their new flagship policy ahead of a two-day Brussels summit. EU finance ministers announced late on Wednesday night that they had reached agreement on a new system for dealing with eurozone banks, under intense pressure to seal the accord on their new flagship policy in advance of a two-day Brussels summit opening on Thursday.
EU officials announced a "crucial breakthrough" on a backstop for rescuing or winding up failing banks in the Eurozone. EU officials announced a "crucial breakthrough" on a fiscal backstop for rescuing or winding up failing banks in the Eurozone at 3am on Wednesday. But the details were inconclusive from the meeting of the Eurozone countries and were still being haggled over by all 28 EU finance ministers in Brussels 18 hours later.
But the details were inconclusive and were still being haggled over by all 28 EU finance ministers in Brussels as Wednesday drew to a close, with the summit due to start on Thursday. All the signs were that Germany had prevailed in its reluctance to assent to any pooled liability for the eurozone banking sector under the new regime of eurozone supervision known as the banking union.
Germany has balked at the notion of pooled taxpayer liability for the eurozone banking sector under a banking union. The key issues were: who pays to wind up or recapitalise a failing eurozone bank, and who decides when a bank should be closed down.
The key issues were: who pays to wind up or recapitalise a failing eurozone bank, and who decides when a bank should be closed down? EU officials said the breakthrough meant a "common" or pooled eurozone backstop would be available for dealing with troubled banks. The common backstop would not be available until 2025 at the earliest and would consist of a €55bn (£46bn) pot of money raised by the banks themselves via a levy over the decade from 2015.
EU officials said the breakthrough meant a "common" or pooled Eurozone backstop would be available for dealing with troubled banks. The common backstop would not be available until 2025 at the earliest and would consist of a €55bn (£46bn) pot of money raised by the banks themselves via a levy over the decade from 2015. In the meantime, Germany conceded that the eurozone's €500bn bailout fund, the European stability mechanism, could be used as a last resort for rescuing failed banks if governments did not have enough money.
In the meantime, Germany conceded that the eurozone's €500bn bailout fund, the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), could be used as a last resort for rescuing failed banks if governments did not have enough money. Earlier the agreement had looked fragile, hedged with conditions and caveats, and was attacked as inadequate by the European Central Bank, whose credibility is at stake as the new supervisor of most of the eurozone banking sector under the new regime.
But the agreement looked fragile, hedged with conditions and caveats, and was attacked as inadequate by the European Central Bank (ECB), whose credibility is at stake as the new supervisor of most of the eurozone banking sector under the new regime. EU leaders need to agree on the banking wind-up arrangements, known as the single resolution mechanism and the single resolution fund, at their summit on Thursday and Friday if the deadlines for getting the new system operational are to be met. Two weeks of late-night meetings in Brussels and Berlin have pushed issues to the brink.
EU leaders need to agree on the banking wind-up arrangements, known as the Single Resolution Mechanism and the Single Resolution Fund, at their summit on Thursday and Friday if the deadlines for getting the new system operational are to be met. There will be big problems with getting the deals agreed with the European parliament, and with national ratifications of a new treaty between participating governments on the funding of banking resolution.
Two weeks of late-night meetings in Brussels and Berlin have pushed issues to the brink. There will be big problems with getting the deals agreed with the European parliament, and with national ratifications of a new treaty between participating governments on the funding of banking resolution.
The French-led group of southern countries, the European commission and the ECB opposed this.The French-led group of southern countries, the European commission and the ECB opposed this.
"It's a choice between a banking union that's not perfect or nothing," said a senior EU official. "It's a choice between a banking union that's not perfect, or nothing," said a senior EU official.
In the transitional decade, from 2015, the issue is what happens in a banking crisis. Under German insistence, there will be no European response except as a last resort; nor will there be any escape from adding to national debt burdens to fund a bailout. The original aim of the scheme was to break the link between bad banks and sovereign debt levels. In the transitional decade, from 2015, the issue is what happens in a banking crisis. On German insistence, there will be no European response except as a last resort; nor will there be any escape from adding to national debt burdens to fund a bailout.
National authorities will be responsible for bailing out banks if funds from the bank levy, as well as contributions from bank creditors, investors, and shareholders, are insufficient.
The governments concerned would also be able to ask to tap the ESM in an emergency, but according to existing restrictive rules. This was the main German concession.The governments concerned would also be able to ask to tap the ESM in an emergency, but according to existing restrictive rules. This was the main German concession.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.