This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25445869

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
UK 'was inappropriately involved in rendition' UK 'was inappropriately involved in rendition'
(35 minutes later)
There is evidence Britain was inappropriately involved in the rendition and ill-treatment of terror suspects, an inquiry has revealed.There is evidence Britain was inappropriately involved in the rendition and ill-treatment of terror suspects, an inquiry has revealed.
Ken Clarke is briefing MPs on the findings of an inquiry into allegation of wrongdoing in MI5 and MI6 in the wake of 9/11.Ken Clarke is briefing MPs on the findings of an inquiry into allegation of wrongdoing in MI5 and MI6 in the wake of 9/11.
There is no evidence British officers were directly involved in torture, said Mr Clarke.There is no evidence British officers were directly involved in torture, said Mr Clarke.
Retired judge Sir Peter Gibson has reviewed 20,000 top secret documents.Retired judge Sir Peter Gibson has reviewed 20,000 top secret documents.
Sir Peter told BBC security correspondent Gordon Corera: "It does appear from the documents that the United Kingdom may have been inappropriately involved in some renditions. That is a very serious matter. And no doubt any future inquiry would want to look at that." Sir Peter told reporters: "It does appear from the documents that the United Kingdom may have been inappropriately involved in some renditions. That is a very serious matter. And no doubt any future inquiry would want to look at that."
His will publish his report later on Thursday. Jack Straw, who was foreign secretary during the period covered by the report, welcomed Mr Clarke's announcement of a further investigation by a committee of MPs and peers, at which he and other witnesses will be able to give evidence.
But he stressed that he never condoned the ill-treatment of terror suspects during his time in office.
"I was never in any way complicit in the unlawful rendition or detention of individuals by the United States or any other states," he told MPs.
He said he had agreed to the transfer of British nationals being held in the US to Guantanamo Bay but added: "We never agreed in any way to the mistreatment of those detainees or to the denial of their rights."
He urged MPs to accept "that we made repeated objections to the United States government about these matters and that I was able to secure the release of all British detainees from Guantanamo Bay by January 2005".
Sir Peter's report does not offer final conclusions because it did not have the chance to interview witnesses. Instead it sets out the issues Mr Gibson feels need to be examined further.
It identifies 200 possible instances of involvement or awareness of mistreatment - of these 40 cases were investigated in depth as considered most illustrative of the issues.
There are no details of individual cases - just the issues raised by them collectively. They point to awareness and possible complicity in mistreatment but not direct torture or mistreatment by British intelligence officers.