This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/01/catholic-groups-us-obamacare-contraception

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Catholic groups seek exemption from Obamacare 'contraception mandate' Obamacare: Catholic groups get temporary reprieve on contraception
(about 5 hours later)
Roman Catholic church-affiliated organisations have asked the US supreme court to block implementation of a part of the Obamacare healthcare law that requires employers to provide insurance policies that cover contraception. The US supreme court Justice Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday night granted Roman Catholic-affiliated groups a temporary exemption from a part of the Obamacare healthcare law that requires employers to provide insurance policies covering contraception.
Catholic University of America and non-profit organisations in Michigan and Tennessee were among those filing three separate applications asking the court to temporarily exempt them from the so-called contraception mandate while litigation continues. The mandate, which is due to take effect for the organisations on 1 January, is already in place for many women who have private health insurance. She issued an order that stops the US government enforcing the so-called contraception mandate against Baltimore-based Little Sisters of the Poor and Illinois-based Christian Brothers Services, plus related entities.
The court did not immediately respond to the applications. There is no set time by which the court is required to act. A lawyer for other Catholic groups that had asked the supreme court to act in three other cases on Tuesday said lower courts had issued temporary injunctions similar to Sotomayor's, meaning the high court had no need to act.
The organisations, represented by the Jones Day law firm in the three applications, also said the court could take a bigger step and decide to hear the merits of their claims. Roman Catholic church-affiliated organisations asked the US supreme court to block implementation of a part of the Obamacare healthcare law that requires employers to provide insurance policies that cover contraception.
One of the applications is pending before Chief Justice John Roberts while two are before Justice Elena Kagan. The justices are assigned responsibility for emergency applications from different regions of the country. Roberts and Kagan can ask for a response from the government, deny the application outright, or refer the issue to the entire court. Catholic University of America and non-profit organisations in Michigan and Tennessee were among those filing three separate applications asking the court to temporarily exempt them from the so-called contraception mandate while litigation continues. The mandate, which comes into effect on 1 January, is already in place for many women who have private health insurance.
The organisations accuse the federal government of forcing them to support contraception and sterilisation in violation of their religious beliefs or face steep fines.The organisations accuse the federal government of forcing them to support contraception and sterilisation in violation of their religious beliefs or face steep fines.
The 2010 Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, requires employers to provide health insurance policies that cover preventive services for women, including contraception and sterilisation.The 2010 Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, requires employers to provide health insurance policies that cover preventive services for women, including contraception and sterilisation.
The act makes an exception for religious institutions such as houses of worship that mainly serve and employ members of their own faith, but not schools, hospitals and charitable organisations that employ people of all faiths.The act makes an exception for religious institutions such as houses of worship that mainly serve and employ members of their own faith, but not schools, hospitals and charitable organisations that employ people of all faiths.
As a compromise, the administration agreed to an accommodation for non-profit organisations affiliated with religious entities that was finalised in July.As a compromise, the administration agreed to an accommodation for non-profit organisations affiliated with religious entities that was finalised in July.
Under the accommodation, eligible non-profits have to provide a "self certification" – described by one lower court judge as a "permission slip" – that authorises the insurance companies to provide the coverage. The challengers say that step alone is enough to violate their religious rights.Under the accommodation, eligible non-profits have to provide a "self certification" – described by one lower court judge as a "permission slip" – that authorises the insurance companies to provide the coverage. The challengers say that step alone is enough to violate their religious rights.
In separate cases, the supreme court already has agreed to hear oral arguments on whether for-profit corporations have the basis to object to the contraception mandate on religious grounds. The court is due to hear the arguments in March and decide the two consolidated cases by the end of June.In separate cases, the supreme court already has agreed to hear oral arguments on whether for-profit corporations have the basis to object to the contraception mandate on religious grounds. The court is due to hear the arguments in March and decide the two consolidated cases by the end of June.
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.