This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-25612204

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Scottish independence: Nicola Sturgeon says No campaign 'must set out vision' Scottish independence: Nicola Sturgeon says No campaign 'must set out vision'
(35 minutes later)
The pro-Union campaign must set out in detail what a No vote in the independence referendum would mean for Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon has said.The pro-Union campaign must set out in detail what a No vote in the independence referendum would mean for Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon has said.
The deputy first minister said the Scottish government had provided "a compelling case for independence" in its White Paper.The deputy first minister said the Scottish government had provided "a compelling case for independence" in its White Paper.
Unionists must respond with a competing vision, she added.Unionists must respond with a competing vision, she added.
Better Together, which opposes independence, said the White Paper was a "wish list without a price list".Better Together, which opposes independence, said the White Paper was a "wish list without a price list".
Ms Sturgeon is due to speak at the University of St Andrews later on Monday in what has been described as the "curtain-raiser" to the 2014 independence campaign ahead of the referendum on 18 September. Ms Sturgeon gave a speech at the University of St Andrews in what was described as the "curtain-raiser" to the 2014 independence campaign ahead of the referendum on 18 September.
Speaking ahead of the address, Ms Sturgeon said: "The referendum is not a choice between change and no change. She appealed to Labour and Conservative supporters to vote Yes in the referendum, stating that the decision "transcends party politics".
"It is about choosing the kind of change we want for Scotland and who we want to be in the driving seat of it - ourselves, or Westminster. It is a choice between two futures. She told her audience that voters did not need to back the SNP to support independence.
"That means that the consequences of both a Yes vote and No vote need to be considered carefully. And that means both the Yes and the No campaigns have an obligation to inform." Ms Sturgeon stated that anecdotal evidence suggested there was already "a pronounced movement" away from a No vote among traditional Labour supporters.
She said the Scotland's Future White Paper, which was published in November, "sets out a compelling case for independence" and gives "robust, credible and common sense answers to the legitimate questions that people have". "We all want Scotland to succeed - no party has a monopoly on that ambition," she said.
"If you accept the principle that the best way of ensuring success is to give ourselves the powers that help determine it, then it doesn't matter whether or not you support the SNP or our specific plans for using those powers."
She added: "Party loyalty should not be a decisive factor in this debate.
"Indeed, I would have thought that for most Tory voters the idea of a parliament that has the power not just to spend money but also responsibility to raise it and be accountable for how it does so, would be inherently appealing."
'Risky step'
Speaking ahead of her address to members of the public, university academics and staff, Ms Sturgeon had said the Scotland's Future White Paper, which was published in November, "sets out a compelling case for independence" and gives "robust, credible and common sense answers to the legitimate questions that people have".
But to make an informed choice, people also need to know what a No vote will mean for Scotland, she said.But to make an informed choice, people also need to know what a No vote will mean for Scotland, she said.
Ms Sturgeon added: "Now, as we enter this next, vital phase of the campaign, it is time for the No campaign to spell that out in detail to allow you to compare and contrast the competing visions for the future of Scotland and make your own minds up." Ms Sturgeon added: "It is time for the No campaign to spell that out in detail to allow you to compare and contrast the competing visions for the future of Scotland and make your own minds up."
A spokesman for Better Together said: "The SNP's White Paper manifesto for breaking up the UK was nothing more than a wish list without a price list.A spokesman for Better Together said: "The SNP's White Paper manifesto for breaking up the UK was nothing more than a wish list without a price list.
"Rather than facing up to the consequences of breaking up the UK, the nationalists promise us the sun would shine brighter everyday if only we were independent. The idea that the White Paper was compelling is, frankly, laughable. "Rather than facing up to the consequences of breaking up the UK, the nationalists promise us the sun would shine brighter every day if only we were independent. The idea that the White Paper was compelling is, frankly, laughable."
"There is a strong positive case for Scotland remaining part of the UK. Today we have the best of both worlds - a strong Scottish Parliament with responsibility for schools, hospitals and childcare, and we benefit from being part of the larger UK. He added: "The SNP are the ones saying that we should take the risky step of leaving the UK, but they cannot even answer the most basic questions like what currency we would use if we go it alone.
"Why would we want to trade the strength and security of being part of the UK for the risk and uncertainty of independence?" "People understand that devolution inside the UK works for Scotland. We have the best of both worlds. Our Scottish Parliament allows us to make decisions on the areas that matter most like health, education and childcare and we get the strength and security of being part of one of the world's biggest economies.
"Why should we trade the success of devolution for the risk and uncertainty of independence?"