This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/06/utah-same-sex-marriages-supreme-court-decision
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Utah same-sex marriages put on hold in US supreme court decision | Utah same-sex marriages put on hold in US supreme court decision |
(about 1 hour later) | |
The spread of gay marriage in the US slowed, at least briefly, on Monday, when the US supreme court ordered a temporary ban on same-sex weddings in Utah while further appeals to a ruling that had allowed them are heard. | |
The legal stay puts gay marriage on hold in one of America's most socially conservative states despite a landmark decision by a federal judge who ruled that Utah's law against the practice was unconstitutional. More than 900 same-sex couples had reportedly rushed to get married in the state after the favourable ruling by judge Robert Shelby late last year. | |
But lawyers for the governor of Utah successfully argued that the state‘s ban should remain in place while they fight against the decision in the 10th circuit court of appeals. After that, the case could ultimately wind up being decided once and for all by the supreme court. | |
Equal rights campaigners were hoping that the supreme court might allow Shelby’s ruling to stand during the appeals process, thereby building further momentum behind two key rulings that the high court made on gay marriage in June. | |
In those earlier decisions, the court had overturned part of the Defense of Marriage Act (Doma), which deprived same-sex couples of federal benefits, and allowed gay marriage in California by declining to overturn a lower-court ruling that had struck down a law that prohibited such unions there. | |
Lawyers on the side of same-sex marriage in the Utah case had argued a stay was unnecessary because the governor could not show who may be “may be seriously and irreparably injured [without] the stay”. | |
Utah initially sought an immediate stay from justice Sonia Sotomayor, who deals with emergency requests in 10th circuit cases, but she referred it to the full bench of supreme court justices rather than make a decision on her own. | |
The short statement that the court issued about its decision on Monday does not indicate how the court’s nine justices voted on the question of whether to stay the matter pending further appeals. | |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |