This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-25671685

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Labour says Royal Mail privatisation 'botched' Labour says Royal Mail privatisation 'botched'
(about 1 hour later)
The government "botched" the privatisation of Royal Mail, short-changing taxpayers by hundreds of millions of pounds, Labour has said. The government "botched" the privatisation of Royal Mail, short-changing taxpayers by hundreds of millions of pounds, by selling shares too cheaply, Labour has said.
Three months on from privatisation, the share price was trading at 561p at Thursday's close of trade. Three months on from privatisation, shares are trading around 561p, 70% higher than the original price of 330p.
The government had said the share price should only be judged after three months and Labour points out it is 70% higher than the original price of 330p. The government had said the share price should only be judged after three months.
The government has denied that shares were sold too cheaply. The Business Minister Michael Fallon denied shares were sold too cheaply.
Labour said Business Secretary Vince Cable had said judgment should be passed on the sale price after three months. 'Duped'?
Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said the shares had consistently been above 500p ever since the privatisation and added: "Three months later, the Business Secretary's dismissal of the sharp rise in share price as 'froth' has been demolished and increasingly it looks like the taxpayer has been left short-changed at a time when services are being cut and families are struggling with David Cameron's cost of living crisis. Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna said the shares had consistently been above 500p ever since the privatisation.
At the time of the share sale, the Business Secretary Vince Cable had said judgment should be passed on the sale price after three, six or 12 months.
Mr Umunna added: "Three months later, the Business Secretary's dismissal of the sharp rise in share price as 'froth' has been demolished.
"Increasingly it looks like the taxpayer has been left short-changed at a time when services are being cut and families are struggling with David Cameron's cost of living crisis.
"We know that Vince Cable considered, then rejected, the option of floating Royal Mail at a higher price which would have brought in more cash for taxpayers."We know that Vince Cable considered, then rejected, the option of floating Royal Mail at a higher price which would have brought in more cash for taxpayers.
"He still has serious outstanding questions to answer on the price he could have received three months ago in respect of what increasingly looks like a botched privatisation.""He still has serious outstanding questions to answer on the price he could have received three months ago in respect of what increasingly looks like a botched privatisation."
Business Minister Michael Fallon told the BBC he could not have sold Royal Mail for any more because the long-term investors he was targeting had told him they would not pay more than £3bn and that it was a risky sale because the company was less profitable than its competitors.
Mr Fallon said he had "certainly not" been duped, highlighting independent advice the government took in the run up to the sale.
He said he was trying to avoid the Royal Mail coming back to the taxpayer to be bailed out to maintain the service, and that the sale had been a success.
But he added: "It is very easy to look back in hindsight."
Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said taxpayers have been "left with a bad taste as hundreds of millions of pounds have been lost".Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said taxpayers have been "left with a bad taste as hundreds of millions of pounds have been lost".
"The British public were against the sale of this great public service as consumers and now they know for sure they got a bad deal as taxpayers too.""The British public were against the sale of this great public service as consumers and now they know for sure they got a bad deal as taxpayers too."