This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/14/david-cameron-inquiry-british-role-amritsar-attack-sas
The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Cameron orders inquiry into claims of British role in 1984 Amritsar attack | Cameron orders inquiry into claims of British role in 1984 Amritsar attack |
(about 1 hour later) | |
David Cameron has asked the cabinet secretary, Sir Jeremy Heywood, to conduct an urgent investigation into a decision by the government of Margaret Thatcher to send an SAS officer to Delhi in 1984 to advise the Indian government on the expulsion of militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar. | |
Amid calls from Sikh groups for an inquiry into the alleged British involvement in planning the operation, the prime minister's spokesman said that the investigation would examine two issues: the British action in 1984 and the decision to release such a sensitive government papers. | |
Heywood will want to examine why the papers were not marked sensitive and held back when papers from 1984 were released under the annual 30-year-rule. | |
The prime minister intervened after the recent explosive release of papers from 1984 which showed that the then foreign secretary, Sir Geoffrey Howe, responded "favourably" to a request from Delhi for help in drawing up plans to launch a military operation to remove militants from the Golden Temple in Amritsar, the holiest site in the Sikh faith. | |
The Indian government said around 400 people were killed when the Indian prime minister, Indira Gandhi, sent troops into the temple in June 1984 in an operation that lasted six days. | |
Sikh groups, which have called for an inquiry into the British role in "one of the darkest episodes in Sikh history", put the death toll in the thousands, including many pilgrims. | |
Gandhi, the daughter of India's first post-independence prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, was assassinated by two Sikh bodyguards in October 1984. This sparked anti-Sikh riots which killed more than 3,000 people. | |
Cameron's spokesman said that Heywood would conduct his enquiry as quickly as possible. "The cabinet secretary has been asked by the prime minister to look into what may have happened in 1984 with regard to papers that have been recently released. The prime minister has asked the cabinet secretary to lead an investigation on that subject. The important thing is to establish all the facts as quickly as possible. That work is underway." | |
The spokesman added: "The reasons behind it [the investigation] is that issues have been raised around the decisions both to release papers and also to consider the facts contained within the papers. So there are two aspects to it." | |
Downing Street acted after Stop Deportations published a letter, dated 23 February 1984, from Howe's private secretary, Brian Fall, to Hugh Taylor, his counterpart under the home secretary of the time, Leon Brittan. It warned about "the possibility of repercussions among the Sikh community in this country" over a possible military operation to remove from the Golden Temple Sikh militants, who had seized it several years earlier. | |
Fall wrote that India had sought British advice over a plan to remove the militants from the complex. "The foreign secretary decided to respond favourably to the Indian request and, with the prime minister's agreement, an SAD officer has visited India and drawn up a plan which has been approved by Mrs Gandhi," he wrote. "The foreign secretary believes that the Indian government may put the plan into operation shortly." The reference to SAD is understood to be a typographical error for SAS, which is referred to later in the letter. | |
Fall wrote that Britain's involvement in advising the Indian authorities should be kept secret to avoid inflaming tensions within the Indian community in Britain. He wrote: "We have impressed upon the Indians the need for security; and knowledge of the SAS officer's visit and of his plan has been tightly held in India and in London. The foreign secretary would be grateful if the contents of this letter could be very strictly limited to those who need to consider the possible domestic implications." | |
The other letter released is from Robin Butler, Thatcher's private secretary, who later became the cabinet secretary. On 6 February 1984 he wrote to Fall saying Thatcher was content for Howe to allow India to receive help, and that Brittan expected to be warned if India looked likely to go ahead with a raid. Butler wrote on 6 February 1984: "The prime minister is content that the foreign secretary should proceed as he proposes." | |
According to the Stop Deportations blog, three other letters in the sequence between Butler and Fall were not released, nor was any other file from after March that year. | According to the Stop Deportations blog, three other letters in the sequence between Butler and Fall were not released, nor was any other file from after March that year. |
The decision is likely to inflict severe damage on the government's relations with the Sikh community. Cameron reached out to Sikhs last year when he visited the Golden Temple last year and the nearby Jallianwala Bagh where he wrote of the "deeply shameful" Amritsar massacre of 1919 when at least 379 innocent Indians died after British troops opened fire. | |
The head of the Sikh Council UK, Gurmel Singh said he was "shocked and disappointed" at the idea the government of Margaret Thatcher may have been involved. The Labour MP Tom Watson, whose West Bromwich constituency is home to many Sikhs, has demanded that the Foreign Office release further papers about any British role. | |
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. | Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning. |