This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jan/19/ed-miliband-consumer-groups-markets-labour

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Ed Miliband wants consumer groups to improve uncompetitive markets Ed Miliband wants consumer groups to improve uncompetitive markets
(about 11 hours later)
Ed Miliband has offered himself as the people's champion standing up to vested interests when he promised consumer groups would help develop the annual work programme of the government's new competition authority. Ed Miliband has offered himself as a champion who could stand up to vested interests when he promised that consumer groups would help develop the annual programme of work for the government's new competition authority.
The commitment came as his aides said they were seizing Conservative ground, reminiscent of the rhetoric of Teddy Roosevelt – the turn-of-the-century Republican US president who offered the voters a square deal to fight "predatory wealth". Miliband's aides said they were seizing Conservative ground, reminiscent of the rhetoric of Teddy Roosevelt – the Republican US president who offered the voters a square deal to fight "predatory wealth".
In an appearance on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme, Miliband said that under Labour plans bodies such as Citizens Advice and Which? would work with the Competition and Markets Authority to define a work programme for the year ahead. The idea is to highlight areas that parliament and the business secretary should be focusing on. Miliband said on the BBC's Andrew Marr programme that under Labour plans, bodies such as Citizens Advice and Which? would work with the Competition and Markets Authority to define a programme for the year ahead. The idea is to highlight areas that parliament and the business secretary should be focusing on.
"We need a system in place to shine a light on broken markets," he said, adding that competition was the best way to defend consumers. He said "too often regulators have been captured", pointing to the example of energy. He promised legislation to ensure consumer bodies were at the heart of setting the annual agenda and work programme of regulatory bodies "We need a system in place to shine a light on broken markets," he said, adding that competition was the best way to defend consumers. He said "too often regulators have been captured", pointing to the example of energy. He promised legislation to ensure that consumer bodies were at the heart of setting the annual agenda of regulatory bodies.
The commitment came after Miliband called last week for greater competition in the banking sector. He said Labour would "go into the election as the party of competition, the party of the consumer, the party of hard-pressed families, the party of working families". Labour said it would introduce an annual competition health check, led jointly by consumers and the competition authorities, to ensure regulators and politicians act when markets do not work in the public interest. It would build on the Consumer Protection Partnership, set up in 2012 to identify harm to consumers, but crucially it would include consumer organisations as well as statutory bodies such as the CMA.
The Conservative party questioned whether this commitment to competition extended to schools and hospitals. They also asked how this could be squared with the Labour conference call to bring the rail franchises back into public ownership by one organisation. The commitment came after Miliband called last week for greater competition in the banking sector following his promise at Labour conference to break up the big energy companies. He said Labour would "go into the election as the party of competition, the party of the consumer, the party of hard-pressed families, the party of working families".
Miliband said Labour would pursue the theme of broken markets further this week, challenging the way in which government had failed to force the giant pubcos to treat pub landlords fairly, leading to a huge wave of pub closures. The Conservative party questioned whether this commitment to competition extended to schools and hospitals. They also asked how this could be squared with the Labour conference call to bring the rail franchises back into public ownership by one organisation. The CBI warned against interfering with the independence of the regulators.
Elsewhere in the interview he said the next Labour government "wants to get the current account into balance by the end of the next parliament and we want to see debt falling". Asked if Labour wanted to eliminate the deficit by the end of the next parliament, he said: "We do want that to happen, yes. It is a tough commitment and it will involve cuts and difficult decisions." But Miliband said Labour would pursue the theme of broken markets further this week, challenging the government's failure to force the giant pub companies to treat pub landlords fairly, which led to a huge wave of pub closures. Labour will call for a statutory code to guide and regulate the relationship between the pubcos and their licensees. It is the third January in a row that the government has been brought to the Commons to discuss pubco regulation. The code will ensure that every landlord has the choice of whether to go free-of-tie, allowing licensees to operate in a more competitive market.
He insisted he could not at this point say if Labour would support a deficit reduction bill likely to be tabled by the government in the autumn. That code of fiscal stability is designed by George Osborne to reveal that Labour is not committed to reducing the deficit. Elsewhere in the interview he said the next Labour government "wants to get the current account into balance by the end of the next parliament and we want to see debt falling". Asked if Labour wanted to eliminate the deficit by the end of the next parliament, he said: "We do want that to happen, yes. It is a tough commitment and it will involve cuts and difficult decisions." Labour officials insisted the party had set out this timetable before, as well as its commitment to match coalition pledges on current spending in 2015-16, the first year after the election.
Miliband said he could not at this point say if Labour would support a deficit reduction bill likely to be tabled by the government in the autumn. That code of fiscal stability is designed by George Osborne to reveal that Labour is not committed to reducing the deficit.
He also defended the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls. "He has the toughness to stand up to people who want more spending when actually it is going to be tough for Labour. He is going to be the shadow chancellor going with me into the next election."He also defended the shadow chancellor, Ed Balls. "He has the toughness to stand up to people who want more spending when actually it is going to be tough for Labour. He is going to be the shadow chancellor going with me into the next election."
He refused to commit to a 50p-tax rate, but said he wanted a fairer system, promising that at the time of the election the party would be clear about the distribution. He was equivocal about the precise progress he would make with the trade unions on reforming the union-party link but he said he was looking at changing the rules for the party leadership elections. He refused to commit to a 50p top tax rate, but said he wanted a fairer system, promising that by the election, the party would be clear about the distribution.
"I want to change the relationship with individual trades unionists in the Labour party. I want them to be able to make an active choice about whether they are affiliated to the Labour party. Changes are going to happen. I am determined they do happen." He was equivocal about the precise progress he would make with the trade unions on reforming the union-party link, but said he was looking at changing the rules for the party leadership elections. "I want to change the relationship with individual trade unionists in the Labour party. I want them to be able to make an active choice about whether they are affiliated to the Labour party. Changes are going to happen. I am determined they do happen."
Asked if this would lead to changes in the Labour leadership election rules, he said: "I do think we do need to look at those rules and that is something that is being looked at as part of this review and always has been." Asked if this would lead to changes in the Labour leadership election rules, he said: "I do think we do need to look at those rules, and that is something that is being looked at as part of this review and always has been."
Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.Our editors' picks for the day's top news and commentary delivered to your inbox each morning.