This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-25869001

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
UK pay rising in real terms, says coalition UK pay rising in real terms, says coalition
(about 1 hour later)
Most British workers have seen their take-home pay rise in real terms in the past year, the government claims.Most British workers have seen their take-home pay rise in real terms in the past year, the government claims.
It has produced figures showing all except the richest 10% saw their take-home wages rise by at least 2.5% once tax cuts were taken into account.It has produced figures showing all except the richest 10% saw their take-home wages rise by at least 2.5% once tax cuts were taken into account.
That is more than the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate of 2.4% in the year to April 2013.That is more than the Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation rate of 2.4% in the year to April 2013.
Labour said the figures were "highly selective" and did not take into account changes to benefits.Labour said the figures were "highly selective" and did not take into account changes to benefits.
The government said the figures show only the top 10% of earners fell behind the CPI rate - which excludes the costs of buying and owning a home such as mortgage interest repayments - with an average increase of 2%.The government said the figures show only the top 10% of earners fell behind the CPI rate - which excludes the costs of buying and owning a home such as mortgage interest repayments - with an average increase of 2%.
It said it made its claims by taking into account cuts to income tax and national insurance.It said it made its claims by taking into account cuts to income tax and national insurance.
BBC political correspondent Iain Watson said the issue of whether households felt better off was far more important than any set of figures and might be what influenced voters ahead of next year's general election.
Conservative skills and enterprise minister Matthew Hancock said: "Of course, as a consequence of the great recession, people who work hard have been made poorer and times are tough for families as a result.Conservative skills and enterprise minister Matthew Hancock said: "Of course, as a consequence of the great recession, people who work hard have been made poorer and times are tough for families as a result.
"That's why, as part of our long-term economic plan, we are cutting taxes for hardworking people so they have more money in their pockets and are more financially secure.""That's why, as part of our long-term economic plan, we are cutting taxes for hardworking people so they have more money in their pockets and are more financially secure."
And speaking to BBC business editor Robert Peston on Thursday Prime Minister David Cameron said: "We are cutting people's taxes so we are seeing some positive signs on take-home pay but it's going to take time and we need to be patient and work through our long-term economic plan so it's a recovery that really lasts and that benefits everyone." 'Positive signs'
But Labour's shadow treasury minister Cathy Jamieson countered, saying: "These highly selective figures from the Tories do not even include the impact of things like cuts to tax credits and child benefit which have hit working families hard." Speaking on Thursday, Prime Minister David Cameron said there were "some positive signs" on take-home pay but a sustained and broad-based recovery in people's finances would take time.
She said that under the current government, real annual wages had fallen by £1,600 since 2010 and figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies showed that "families are on average £891 worse off as a result of tax and benefit changes since 2010". But Labour said the government's figures were based on weekly, not annual earnings and real annual wages had fallen by £1,600, on average, since 2010.
BBC deputy political editor James Landale said the government was trying to counter criticism from Labour that people were not feeling there was an economic recovery under way. "The government is choosing selectively the figures it uses," said shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna.
"The question is whether this kind of battle over statistics that will now ensue matters more than how people actually feel in their pockets," our correspondent said. "They are looking at individuals in isolation without looking at the impact of government changes to people's household incomes."
He added: "You have got a government saying 'crisis what crisis'. It illustrates just how out of touch they are when they go to the lengths they have over the last 24 hours to try and convince people to give them a pat on the back."
Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the government had used "a perfectly sensible set of numbers" to calculate take-home pay for the 2012-2013 period.Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the government had used "a perfectly sensible set of numbers" to calculate take-home pay for the 2012-2013 period.
But he pointed out that more up-to-date Office for National Statistics data - the average weekly earnings index - showed wages rose "quite a lot less quickly than inflation in the most recent months".But he pointed out that more up-to-date Office for National Statistics data - the average weekly earnings index - showed wages rose "quite a lot less quickly than inflation in the most recent months".
He added that the IFS's own analysis suggested that "if the recovery takes off and continues as expected, people will start to see their incomes rising by 2015... but they will be well below where they were six or seven years ago".He added that the IFS's own analysis suggested that "if the recovery takes off and continues as expected, people will start to see their incomes rising by 2015... but they will be well below where they were six or seven years ago".
TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady said the government's figures should be taken "with several tons of salt" as they did not include the effects of tax credits and benefits. Labour's £1,600 figure also only gave a "partial picture", the IFS added.
"Freezing child benefit has hit families hard," she added. TUC General Secretary Frances O'Grady said the government's figures should be taken "with several tons of salt" as they did not include the effects of tax credits and benefits, particularly the freeze in child benefits.
Earlier this week, the International Monetary Fund upgraded its forecast for the UK economy.Earlier this week, the International Monetary Fund upgraded its forecast for the UK economy.
It now expects the economy to grow 2.4% this year - faster than any other major European economy - against its previous forecast of 1.9%.It now expects the economy to grow 2.4% this year - faster than any other major European economy - against its previous forecast of 1.9%.
That was further evidence, the Treasury said, that the government's economic plan was working.