This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/technology/google-eu-reach-settlement-in-antitrust-case/2014/02/05/553541e0-8e7b-11e3-b46a-5a3d0d2130da_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Google, E.U. reach settlement in antitrust case Google, E.U. reach settlement in antitrust case
(about 4 hours later)
Google settled an antitrust case with European regulators on Wednesday, ending a more than three-year investigation into whether the tech firm’s search practices undermined competition. Google settled an antitrust case with European regulators Wednesday, ending an investigation lasting more than three years into whether the tech firm’s search practices undermined competition.
The tentative settlement does not require Google to pay a fine, which could have topped $5 billion, and the Mountain View, Calif., company did not admit wrongdoing.The tentative settlement does not require Google to pay a fine, which could have topped $5 billion, and the Mountain View, Calif., company did not admit wrongdoing.
Under the deal, Google agreed to make modest changes to the way it displays content in Europe. A competitor could pay to have their content “clearly visible” in Google’s search results for services such as hotels and restaurants. Under the deal, Google agreed to make modest changes to the way it displays content in Europe. A competitor could pay to have its content “clearly visible” in Google’s search results for services such as hotels and restaurants.
A user searching for a gas grill, for example, would be shown two boxes adjacent to each other, one featuring “Google Shopping results” and a second one labeled “Alternatives.”A user searching for a gas grill, for example, would be shown two boxes adjacent to each other, one featuring “Google Shopping results” and a second one labeled “Alternatives.”
Google, which controls more than 90 percent of the search market in some European countries, said in a statement that the deal reflects “significant changes” to the way it operates in Europe. The deal will not affect what Americans see when they use Google.Google, which controls more than 90 percent of the search market in some European countries, said in a statement that the deal reflects “significant changes” to the way it operates in Europe. The deal will not affect what Americans see when they use Google.
As part of its agreement, Google is also required to make it easier for advertisers to run ads simultaneously on Google’s ad platform and those of competitors. And Google will be required to give third-party sites more control over whether their content is listed in search results.As part of its agreement, Google is also required to make it easier for advertisers to run ads simultaneously on Google’s ad platform and those of competitors. And Google will be required to give third-party sites more control over whether their content is listed in search results.
After two previous proposals were rejected as unsuitable, European Union antitrust commissioner Joaquin Almunia said Wednesday that Google’s new offer addressed the commission’s concerns.After two previous proposals were rejected as unsuitable, European Union antitrust commissioner Joaquin Almunia said Wednesday that Google’s new offer addressed the commission’s concerns.
However, the deal immediately drew criticism from competitors who said it did not go far enough. But the deal immediately drew criticism from competitors that said it did not go far enough.
FairSearch Europe, an interest group whose members include Microsoft, Nokia, travel site Expedia and others, said accepting Google’s offer was “worse than doing nothing.” Requiring competitors to pay in order to receive the improved placement leaves them at a continued disadvantage, they said. FairSearch Europe, an interest group whose members include Microsoft, Nokia, travel site Expedia and others, said accepting Google’s offer was “worse than doing nothing.” Requiring competitors to pay in order to receive the improved placement leaves them at a continued disadvantage, it said.
It undercuts “the ability of others to compete and provide consumer choice,” Thomas Vinje, legal counsel for FairSearch Europe, said in a statement. The offer undercuts “the ability of others to compete and provide consumer choice,” Thomas Vinje, legal counsel for FairSearch Europe, said in a statement.
Despite those concerns, the European settlement goes farther than the U.S. Federal Trade Commission's examination of Google. After a two-year antitrust investigation, the FTC dropped the case, saying Google had not broken any laws. Despite those concerns, the European settlement goes farther than the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s examination of Google. After a two-year antitrust investigation, the FTC dropped the case, saying Google had not broken any laws.
The end of Google’s European battle clears the search giant from a litany of legal scrutiny. Two years ago, the company was under investigation on both sides of the Atlantic, but it has emerged largely unscathed. The European Commission said it will continue a separate antitrust probe into whether Google is using its Android operating system to dominate that market. The end of Google’s European battle clears the search giant from a litany of legal scrutiny. Two years ago, the company was under investigation on both sides of the Atlantic, but it has emerged largely unscathed. The European Commission said it will continue a separate antitrust probe into whether Google is using its Android operating system to dominate the mobile market.
Some experts have complained that the commission had not been transparent about the deal. “If they had confidence in the proposal, they would put it out for public comment,” said Gary Reback, a Silicon Valley antitrust lawyer.Some experts have complained that the commission had not been transparent about the deal. “If they had confidence in the proposal, they would put it out for public comment,” said Gary Reback, a Silicon Valley antitrust lawyer.
The commission will review comments from competitors before finalizing the deal, but it has not released the details of Google’s proposal to the public, unlike the last two drafts. The commission will review comments from competitors before finalizing the deal, but it has not released the details of Google’s proposal to the public, unlike the previous two drafts.
An independent trustee will be responsible for monitoring the tech company’s compliance with the new agreement for the next five years.An independent trustee will be responsible for monitoring the tech company’s compliance with the new agreement for the next five years.
Tim Lee contributed t Timothy B. Lee contributed to this report.
o this report.
Related:Related:
How Google’s antitrust deal in the E.U. will affect youHow Google’s antitrust deal in the E.U. will affect you
Follow The Post’s new tech blog, The Switch, where technology and policy connect.Follow The Post’s new tech blog, The Switch, where technology and policy connect.