This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/science/animal-magic/2014/feb/12/celebrity-pet-discovery-darwin-tortoise

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Celebrity pet: the rediscovery of Charles Darwin’s long-lost Galapagos tortoise Celebrity pet: the rediscovery of Charles Darwin’s long-lost Galapagos tortoise
(about 4 hours later)
Name: 1874.6.1.6Species:Name: 1874.6.1.6Species:
Chelonoidis darwiniDates: 1834-1837Claim toChelonoidis darwiniDates: 1834-1837Claim to
fame: Darwin’s pet tortoisefame: Darwin’s pet tortoise
Where now: Natural History Museum, LondonWhere now: Natural History Museum, London
When inWhen in
the Galapagos, Charles Darwin and his Beagle chums ate a couple of dozen giantthe Galapagos, Charles Darwin and his Beagle chums ate a couple of dozen giant
tortoises, tossing their empty shells over board en route to Tahiti. But in histortoises, tossing their empty shells over board en route to Tahiti. But in his
Narrative of the voyage, captain RobertNarrative of the voyage, captain Robert
FitzRoy made it clear that a few small tortoises had survived. “Several were brought alive to England,” he wrote.FitzRoy made it clear that a few small tortoises had survived. “Several were brought alive to England,” he wrote.
For FitzRoyFor FitzRoy
had scooped up two tiny tortoises from Espanola (an island in the south of thehad scooped up two tiny tortoises from Espanola (an island in the south of the
archipelago) and took enough interest in them to monitor their growth duringarchipelago) and took enough interest in them to monitor their growth during
the home-stretch of the voyage: “a small one grew the home stretch of the voyage: “a small one grew
three-eighths of an inch, in length, in three months; and another grew twothree-eighths of an inch, in length, in three months; and another grew two
inches in length in one year.”inches in length in one year.”
There were at least two other smallThere were at least two other small
Galapagos tortoises on board, as noted by Darwin himself. One – “Covington’sGalapagos tortoises on board, as noted by Darwin himself. One – “Covington’s
little Tortoise” – had been brought from Floreana by his assistant Symslittle Tortoise” – had been brought from Floreana by his assistant Syms
Covington. The other – “Mine from James” – seems to have been Darwin’s,Covington. The other – “Mine from James” – seems to have been Darwin’s,
collected during his stay on Santiago (or James Island, as it wascollected during his stay on Santiago (or James Island, as it was
then known). It’s rather nice to imagine it plodding roundthen known). It’s rather nice to imagine it plodding round
his cramped cabin as he set about cataloguing his Galapagos specimens.his cramped cabin as he set about cataloguing his Galapagos specimens.
But where did Darwin’s pet tortoise endBut where did Darwin’s pet tortoise end
up? It’s a fabulous question that has given rise to a fabulous myth, one thatup? It’s a fabulous question that has given rise to a fabulous myth, one that
is documented in detail in A Sheltered Life by Paul Chambers. In short,is documented in detail in A Sheltered Life by Paul Chambers. In short,
Darwin’s tortoise is supposed to have become Harriet, a giant tortoise that lived at the Australia Zoo in Queensland until her death in 2006, (allegedly transported down Darwin’s tortoise is supposed to have become Harriet, a giant tortoise that lived at the Australia Zoo in Queensland until her death in 2006 (allegedly transported down
under by John Clements Wickham, the Beagle’s first lieutenantunder by John Clements Wickham, the Beagle’s first lieutenant
under FitzRoy).under FitzRoy).
On its website,On its website,
the Australia Zoo still claims “Harriet wasthe Australia Zoo still claims “Harriet was
collected from the Galapagos Islands in 1835 by Sir Charles Darwin when she wascollected from the Galapagos Islands in 1835 by Sir Charles Darwin when she was
just the size of a dinner plate.” This, as Chambers clearly demonstrated in hisjust the size of a dinner plate.” This, as Chambers clearly demonstrated in his
book and in a follow-up feature in New Scientist, is simply wishful thinking. Hebook and in a follow-up feature in New Scientist, is simply wishful thinking. He
gave many compelling reasons, including the fact that Harriet appears to havegave many compelling reasons, including the fact that Harriet appears to have
come from Santa Cruz (a Galapagos island not visited by the Beagle). Unfortunately though, Chamberscome from Santa Cruz (a Galapagos island not visited by the Beagle). Unfortunately though, Chambers
was not able to track down Darwin’s tortoise to another location, which wouldwas not able to track down Darwin’s tortoise to another location, which would
have definitively debunked the Harriet fable. A few years after Chambers’have definitively debunked the Harriet fable. A few years after Chambers’
investigation, however, Darwin’s tortoise – missing for over 170 years –investigation, however, Darwin’s tortoise – missing for over 170 years –
finally turned up in the Natural History Museum in London. finally turned up at the Natural History Museum in London.
II
emailed Colin McCarthy, former collections manager for reptiles, amphibians andemailed Colin McCarthy, former collections manager for reptiles, amphibians and
fish at the museum, to ask him to elaborate. “I canfish at the museum, to ask him to elaborate. “I can
pinpoint my discovery to late March 2009,” he says. Over the course of thepinpoint my discovery to late March 2009,” he says. Over the course of the
preceding year, McCarthy had been busy preparing a list of reptiles andpreceding year, McCarthy had been busy preparing a list of reptiles and
amphibians collected by Darwin during the course of the Beagle voyage. When it came to theamphibians collected by Darwin during the course of the Beagle voyage. When it came to the
tortoises he’d brought back, there were some loose ends, “specimens that hadtortoises he’d brought back, there were some loose ends, “specimens that had
been listed in early registers but not in later catalogues.”been listed in early registers but not in later catalogues.”
Down in the basement of the museum in the now-famous Zoology DryDown in the basement of the museum in the now-famous Zoology Dry
Storeroom No. 1, McCarthy was going through some unlabeled specimens when he cameStoreroom No. 1, McCarthy was going through some unlabeled specimens when he came
across a small tortoise with its plastron (undercarriage) loosely wired to itsacross a small tortoise with its plastron (undercarriage) loosely wired to its
carapace (shell). “Hinging the plastron back I noticed ‘James’” etched into thecarapace (shell). “Hinging the plastron back I noticed ‘James’” etched into the
surface, he says. “I could hardly believe my eyes and immediately put thesurface, he says. “I could hardly believe my eyes and immediately put the
specimen back on the shelf in case I dropped it in my excitement!”specimen back on the shelf in case I dropped it in my excitement!”
AlsoAlso
scratched on the inside of the plastron, hidden from McCarthy’s scratched on the inside of the plastron, hidden from McCarthy’s
predecessors, there was the registration number: 37.8.13.1. Armed with predecessors, there was the registration number: 37.8.13.1. Armed with
thisthis
information, he combed back through the zoology register and there, information, he combed back through the zoology register and there,
logged onlogged on
13 August 1837, were two tortoises “presented by Charles Darwin Esq”, 13 August 1837, were two tortoises “presented by Charles Darwin Esq”,
oneone
corresponding to Darwin’s pet from Santiago (James) and the other to corresponding to Darwin’s pet from Santiago (James) and the other to
Covington’sCovington’s
pet from Floreana (Charles).pet from Floreana (Charles).
FromFrom
this entry, it emerges that Darwin visited South Kensington in August 1837 andthis entry, it emerges that Darwin visited South Kensington in August 1837 and
presented these two tortoises to John Edward Gray, then assistant keeper of zoology at the museum. By then, Darwin had figuredpresented these two tortoises to John Edward Gray, then assistant keeper of zoology at the museum. By then, Darwin had figured
out that each of the Galapagos Islands probably had suite of allied yet subtly out that each of the Galapagos Islands probably had a suite of allied yet subtly
different species. FitzRoy had already deposited his two Espanola tortoisesdifferent species. FitzRoy had already deposited his two Espanola tortoises
with Gray earlier in the year and Darwin was hoping that therewith Gray earlier in the year and Darwin was hoping that there
might be some clear differences in tortoise morphology from one island to themight be some clear differences in tortoise morphology from one island to the
next.next.
Unfortunately, juvenile tortoises – even ones from different islandsUnfortunately, juvenile tortoises – even ones from different islands
– look pretty similar. “The specimens,”– look pretty similar. “The specimens,”
Darwin conceded, “were young ones; and probably owing to this cause, neitherDarwin conceded, “were young ones; and probably owing to this cause, neither
Mr. Gray nor myself could find in them any specific differences,” he wrote in Mr Gray nor myself could find in them any specific differences,” he wrote in
the beefed-up second edition of his Journalthe beefed-up second edition of his Journal
of Researches published in 1845.of Researches published in 1845.
If Darwin’s tortoise has been in theIf Darwin’s tortoise has been in the
Natural History Museum all along, how come nobody noticed? WellNatural History Museum all along, how come nobody noticed? Well
they did and they didn’t. Writing in Chelonian Conservation and Biology in 2010, McCarthy (and athey did and they didn’t. Writing in Chelonian Conservation and Biology in 2010, McCarthy (and a
colleague Aaron Bauer) were able to identify bothcolleague Aaron Bauer) were able to identify both
Darwin and Covington’s tortoises in a succession of museum catalogues produced byDarwin and Covington’s tortoises in a succession of museum catalogues produced by
a succession of curators, ultimately being given a new accession number in 1874a succession of curators, ultimately being given a new accession number in 1874
(1874.6.1.6). Crucially, however, Darwin’s name never appears alongside(1874.6.1.6). Crucially, however, Darwin’s name never appears alongside
these entries. In 1844, for instance, Gray knocked up a Catalogue of Tortoises, Crocodiles andthese entries. In 1844, for instance, Gray knocked up a Catalogue of Tortoises, Crocodiles and
AmphibiansAmphibians
in the collection. Darwin’s and Covington’s tortoises are there but this is allin the collection. Darwin’s and Covington’s tortoises are there but this is all
it says:it says:
f. Young, 7 inches. Nuchal plate none.g. Young, 6 inches. Nuchal plate none, feetf. Young, 7 inches. Nuchal plate none.g. Young, 6 inches. Nuchal plate none, feet
bad.bad.
BasedBased
on a recent publication of the growthon a recent publication of the growth
rate of young tortoises in captivity, arate of young tortoises in captivity, a
7-inch carapace suggests that Darwin’s tortoise would have been just over three7-inch carapace suggests that Darwin’s tortoise would have been just over three
years old at the time of death. Assuming it passed away in 1837, promptingyears old at the time of death. Assuming it passed away in 1837, prompting
Darwin to take it along to the museum, it seems reasonable to assume it hatchedDarwin to take it along to the museum, it seems reasonable to assume it hatched
out in Galapagos in 1834 (or thereabouts).out in Galapagos in 1834 (or thereabouts).
It might seem odd that Gray didn’t stickIt might seem odd that Gray didn’t stick
Darwin’s name into catalogue. Then again why would he? Remember, this was a Darwin’s name into the catalogue. Then again why would he? Remember, this was a
full fifteen years before Darwin published On the Origin of Species. There was full 15 years before Darwin published On the Origin of Species. There was
no way that Gray could have anticipated the celebrity that Darwin would become,no way that Gray could have anticipated the celebrity that Darwin would become,
less still how much interest this small andless still how much interest this small and
unassuming reptile would generate 170 years later.unassuming reptile would generate 170 years later.
I’m thrilled it survives. It can be seenI’m thrilled it survives. It can be seen
on aon a
tour of the Spirit Collection. Happy birthday Chuck! tour of the Spirit Collection.
Happy birthday Chuck!
TaleTale
endsends
ThereThere
are several loose ends to this story that remain to be cleared up. If you canare several loose ends to this story that remain to be cleared up. If you can
help solve any of these outstanding mysteries, please leave ahelp solve any of these outstanding mysteries, please leave a
comment or send me a message on Twitter @WayOfThePanda.comment or send me a message on Twitter @WayOfThePanda.
If there is a zoological specimen with aIf there is a zoological specimen with a
great story that you would like to see profiled, please contact Henry Nicholls @WayOfThePanda.great story that you would like to see profiled, please contact Henry Nicholls @WayOfThePanda.