This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-26151061

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
'Cosmetic crisis' measures expected New cosmetic rules 'are appalling'
(about 5 hours later)
Tougher rules on dermal fillers, Botox injections and plastic surgery are set to be announced for England. Fresh rules for the cosmetic procedures industry in England are "appalling" and pay "only lip service" to patient safety, warn surgeons.
A review last year warned dermal fillers could cause lasting harm, but were covered by only the same level of regulation as ballpoint pens. Ministers have announced new regulations to tackle an industry accused of selling everything from surgery to Botox "like double glazing".
Ministers have warned of "cowboy practices" across an industry worth more than £2bn a year in the UK. The industry has been described as a "crisis waiting to happen". It will become illegal to offer dermal fillers without training and a register of all breast implants will be set up.
Surgeons support the move. But surgeons' groups immediately damned the move as another missed opportunity.
A review last year by the Department of Health in England said there was considerable concern that regulations had failed to keep pace - leaving patients vulnerable. Dermal fillers used to plump up lips and get rid of wrinkles are one major area of contention.
It recommended: A review of the industry by the medical director of the NHS in England, Sir Bruce Keogh, warned fillers could cause lasting harm, but were covered by only the same level of regulation as ballpoint pens and toothbrushes.
The government's full response will come later on Thursday morning, and Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will also be able to choose whether to adopt the measures. He said they were a crisis waiting to happen and should become prescription only.
However, ministers in England have already announced that every breast implant operation should be recorded on a new register. However, this will not take place - a move criticised by plastic surgeons.
A lack of records meant some surgeons were unable to tell their patients whether they were affected by the recent scare over substandard breast implants made by the French company Poly Implant Prothese (PIP). Rajiv Grover, a consultant plastic surgeon and president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS), told the BBC: Frankly, we are no less than appalled at the lack of action taken - this review, not the first one conducted into the sector, represents yet another thoroughly wasted opportunity to ensure patient safety.
Speaking ahead of the announcement, Rajiv Grover, a consultant plastic surgeon and president of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (BAAPS), told the BBC: "The important issue here is that fillers must be classified as prescription-only as it will kill three birds with one stone. "Legislators have clearly been paying only lip service to the sector's dire warnings that dermal fillers are a crisis waiting to happen.
"It would regulate the sale and the quality of fillers, who is allowed to administer them and would ban them from being advertised." "The ability to classify fillers as prescription only would have allowed three birds to be killed with one stone.
Michael Saul, from TJL solicitors, represents the victims of botched cosmetic procedures, including one patient who went blind in one eye immediately after being injected with a dermal filler. "It would effectively have controlled the marketing and sale of these fillers, it would have regulated who can perform these injections and it would have provided an automatic ban on advertising.
He said: "There is a problem in the private sector of cosmetic surgery. It is a very lucrative business that has outgrown its regulatory framework. "This is an opportunity missed."
"The big problem at the heart of it is the conflict between the commercial imperative of the clinic and ethical duty of the doctor - the balance is often very wrong." Filler
He called for a ban on surgery deals like mother-daughter offers as it was "completely inappropriate" for invasive surgery to be "sold like double glazing". The rise of fillers is one example of how the cosmetic procedures industry had boomed - from £750m in the UK in 2005 to a predicted £3.6bn by 2015 - yet regulations are widely seen as failing to keep pace.
Graeme Perks, president of the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons, said: "The range of cosmetic non-surgical interventions that are available has increased exponentially over the last few years and the current regulatory framework is not protecting individuals, particularly vulnerable groups, from bad and often inappropriate practice. "Win a boob job" competitions, mother-daughter offers and time restricted deals on surgery have also been criticised.
"It is our view that all injectable materials need to be registered as medical devices, including both absorbable and permanent fillers, to ensure they are subject to the appropriate regulatory procedures. During one of the biggest health scares to face the industry - surrounding substandard breast implants made by the French company Poly Implant Prothese (PIP) - a lack of records meant some surgeons were unable to tell their patients whether they were affected.
"We look forward to seeing the forthcoming European legislation on this matter." Ministers in England said the industry had to change and have announced:
Ministers in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will decide separately if they want to introduce any of the measures.
Health minister Dan Poulter used the report's foreword to say: "At its worst, this is an industry that is exploiting people's insecurities, driven only by profits and with no regard to the physical and mental wellbeing of patients."
"So it is hard to believe that, while these procedures can change the way you look temporarily and sometimes permanently, to date there has been virtually no regulation of the industry and no controls over who can perform these treatments or where they are carried out, despite the fact that they can so easily go wrong.
"This is the beginning of a process in which we shall ensure proportionate and appropriate improvements in the industry to better protect the consumers and patients of tomorrow."
Mr Grover added: "With all the evidence provided by the clinical community, choosing not to reclassify fillers as medicines with immediate effect or setting up any kind of compulsory register beggars belief.
"Most shockingly of all, the fact that there is no requirement for the actual surgeon involved to provide consent for the procedure makes a mockery of the entire process.
"It's business as usual in the Wild West and the message from the government is clear: roll up and feel free to have a stab."
In a statement, Sir Bruce Keogh said: "I'm pleased to see today that the government has accepted the vast majority of recommendations and in some cases proposed workable alternatives to make the cosmetic industry safer.
"Plans to bring in training and clear standards for both surgical and non-surgical procedures will go a long way to bringing the improvements we need to see as will looking into the best way to protect people if their treatment in the private sector goes wrong.
"This is the beginning of a journey, not the end, but I am confident these changes will create a much safer and skilled cosmetic industry which should reassure both consumers and practitioners."