This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-india-26184819

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Wendy Doniger's The Hindus: Penguin India defends decision to recall book Wendy Doniger's The Hindus: Penguin India defends decision to recall book
(about 1 hour later)
Penguin India has defended its decision to recall and destroy copies of a book on Hinduism by a prominent US scholar.Penguin India has defended its decision to recall and destroy copies of a book on Hinduism by a prominent US scholar.
In its first comments on the row Penguin said it had to respect the laws of land, such as those which make it a crime to offend religious feeling.In its first comments on the row Penguin said it had to respect the laws of land, such as those which make it a crime to offend religious feeling.
Penguin also said it had a duty to protect its employees against threats.Penguin also said it had a duty to protect its employees against threats.
Wendy Doniger's book The Hindus: An Alternative History had been the subject of a legal challenge claiming the text was offensive to Hindus.Wendy Doniger's book The Hindus: An Alternative History had been the subject of a legal challenge claiming the text was offensive to Hindus.
Details of an apparent agreement between the Hindu campaign group Shiksha Bachao Andolan and Penguin India were circulated online earlier this week. Hindu campaign group Shiksha Bachao Andolan brought a civil case in 2011 against Penguin India, arguing that the book contained "heresies" insulting to Hindus.
Shiksha Bachao Andolan brought a civil case in 2011 against Penguin India arguing that the book was insulting to Hindus, containing what they described as "heresies". Penguin reached an apparent out-of-court agreement with the group, details of which were circulated online earlier this week.
The group's president Dina Nath Batra said the book was focused on "sex and eroticism". 'Restrictive' laws
Penguin's decision to withdraw the book sparked widespread criticism with many saying it was undermining free speech, the BBC's Andrew North reports from Delhi. The decision to withdraw the book sparked widespread criticism that it undermined free speech, with many asking why such a big company had given in to a little-known group, the BBC's Andrew North reports from Delhi.
Many asked why such a big company had apparently given in, after four years of legal wrangling, to the little-known Hindu nationalist group that brought the case against the book. The publisher has not directly answered that question, but in its statement it said it had an obligation to respect the laws of the land "however intolerant or restrictive".
The publisher has not directly answered that question, but in its statement it said it had an obligation to respect the laws of the land in which it operates, however intolerant and restrictive. India's Penal Code makes it a criminal offence to deliberately outrage or insult "religious feelings" by spoken or written words, potentially putting Penguin India in a vulnerable legal position in the wake of the challenge by the Hindu group.
Penguin took direct aim at a section of the Indian law which makes it a crime to offend or insult any religion - or what are called religious feelings. Penguin warned that such laws "will make it increasingly difficult for any Indian publisher to uphold international standards of free expression".
That, said Penguin, makes it increasingly difficult for any Indian publisher to uphold international standards of free expression without deliberately placing itself outside the law, our correspondent adds. But critics argue that Penguin should have defended its case further.
"There hasn't been any court order. The settlement was signed before they went to Supreme Court. Of course, there is a problem with strange and ambiguous laws, but they didn't fight it until the end," Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy told the BBC.
Earlier this week, she wrote an open letter to Penguin asking it to explain why it "caved" in. She argues this marks a "dismaying shift showing submission to a growing attitude of intolerance".
Wendy Doniger said she did not blame Penguin but added that she was deeply angered and concerned for freedom of speech in India.Wendy Doniger said she did not blame Penguin but added that she was deeply angered and concerned for freedom of speech in India.
Many in India criticised the decision amid growing concern that religious groups were stifling free speech and artistic expression in the country. Many others in India have added to the chorus of criticism amid growing concern that religious groups were stifling free speech and artistic expression in the country.
Earlier this week, Booker prize-winning author Arundhati Roy wrote an open letter to Penguin asking it to explain why it "caved" in even though there "was no fatwa, no ban, not even a court order".
"You must tell us what happened. What was it that terrified you? You owe us, your writers an explanation at the very least," she wrote.