This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/dj-chris-moyles-claimed-to-be-car-dealer-to-save-1m-in-tax-9145349.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
DJ Chris Moyles claimed to be car dealer to save £1m in tax Chris Moyles claimed to be a second-hand car dealer in £1million tax scheme, tribunal heard
(35 minutes later)
DJ Chris Moyles claimed to be a second-hand car dealer in a bid to save up to £1m in tax, a tribunal has found. Former Radio 1 DJ Chris Moyles has apologised for his part in a £1million tax scheme that saw him pose as a second-hand car dealer in order to claim expenses, a tribunal has found.
A tax court named Moyles and two other men as having taking part in a scheme called “working wheels” which counted “450 fund managers, celebrities and other high earners between 2006 and 2008” as members. A published judgment from the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal named Moyles and two other men as having taken part in the "working with wheels" deal, which counted "450 fund managers, celebrities and other high earners between 2006 and 2008" as members.
The scheme worked by allowing its members to say they had incurred large fees while working in the second-hand car trade which they could claim back against their tax bill. The scheme allowed members to claim that they had incurred large fees by working as second-hand salesmen, which they could then claim back against their own tax bills.
A published judgment from the Tax Chamber of the First-tier Tribunal said Moyles’s self-assessment tax return for the financial year ending on April 5, 2008, when he was presenting Radio 1’s Breakfast Show, said he “had engaged in self-employment as a used car trader”. Moyles’ self-assessment tax return for the financial year ending on 5 April 2008 – while he was still a presenter on BBC Radio One’s Breakfast Show – claimed that the DJ "had engaged in self-employment as a used car trader".
Moyles did not give evidence directly to the tribunal but did submit “a brief witness statement”. Moyles did not give evidence himself at the tribunal, but he did submit a "brief witness statement".
The tribunal, under Judge Colin Bishopp, described that evidence as “very brief and rather uninformative”. Judge Colin Bishopp described the evidence as "very brief and rather uninformative".
The judgment said: “It is however clear from the statement that he too entered the scheme for no purpose other than to achieve a tax saving.” "It is however quite clear from the statement that he too entered the scheme for no purpose other than to achieve a tax saving, and that he took no interest in the trade," the judgement said.
It went on to say that Moyles was “anxious to be reassured that the scheme was lawful, and that he would not have to undertake any trading”. It added that Moyles was "anxious to be reassured that the scheme was lawful, and that he would not have to undertake any trading himself".
It said his accountant, a Mr Smith, had “agreed that the scale of Moyles’s borrowing was driven solely by the amount of the tax loss he wanted to achieve, in his case £1m, and that the trading was not carried was merely a means to an end”. It also detailed that his accountant, Mr Smith, had "agreed that the scale of Moyles’s borrowing was driven solely by the amount of the tax loss he wanted to achieve, in his case £1 million, and that the trading was not carried on for its own sake but was merely a means to an end".
Exchequer Secretary David Gauke said: “This case is another example of why taxpayers should not fall for the promises of promoters selling schemes that are all too often too good to be true. Not only will the taxpayer waste money on the fees for these failed schemes, they will still have to pay all the tax, interest and penalties that are due. Exchequer Secretary David Gauke said: "This case is another example of why taxpayers should not fall for the promises of promoters selling schemes that are all too often too good to be true.
“This Government has provided HMRC with the resources to tackle these avoidance schemes and HMRC will now pursue the other users of the scheme to make sure all the taxes that are due are paid.” "Not only will the taxpayer waste money on the fees for these failed schemes, they will still have to pay all the tax, interest and penalties that are due.
PA "This Government has provided HMRC with the resources to tackle these avoidance schemes and HMRC will now pursue the other users of the scheme to make sure all the taxes that are due are paid."
Moyles addressed the ruling on Twitter, posting:
I want to comment about a recent tribunal tax ruling.
Upon advice, I signed up to a scheme which I was assured was legal. Despite this, my knowledge of the dealings of the scheme were naive.
I'm not a tax expert and acted on advice I was given. This was a mistake and I accept the ruling without reservation.
I take full responsibility and have learnt a valuable lesson.