This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/why-the-cia-and-lawmakers-are-feuding/2014/03/11/883d7cb4-a925-11e3-8d62-419db477a0e6_story.html?wprss=rss_national-security

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Why the CIA and lawmakers are feuding Why the CIA and lawmakers are feuding
(about 7 hours later)
On Tuesday, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee issued sharp criticism of the CIA, saying that the agency had improperly interfered with one of the panel’s most sensitive investigations. The remarks by Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) marked an extraordinary — and extraordinarily public — turn in a long-simmering dispute between lawmakers and the intelligence agency. On Tuesday, the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee sharply criticized the CIA, saying the agency had improperly interfered with one of the panel’s most sensitive investigations. The comments by Chairman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) marked an extraordinary — and extraordinarily public — turn in a long-simmering dispute between lawmakers and the intelligence agency.
Some details on the back story: Some details of the back story:
What is this Senate report that has Congress and the CIA feuding in such a public way?What is this Senate report that has Congress and the CIA feuding in such a public way?
In 2009, the Senate Intelligence Committee began an exhaustive review of the CIA’s erstwhile detention and interrogation program. The program used harsh tactics such as waterboarding, or simulated drowning, to elicit information from terrorism suspects held at secret prisons overseas.In 2009, the Senate Intelligence Committee began an exhaustive review of the CIA’s erstwhile detention and interrogation program. The program used harsh tactics such as waterboarding, or simulated drowning, to elicit information from terrorism suspects held at secret prisons overseas.
What does the report say?What does the report say?
According to U.S. officials, the 6,000-page report shows that the CIA misled Congress, the White House and the Department of Justice and overstated the program’s success before President Obama ended it in 2009. So far, the report’s exact details have not been made public. Feinstein, the Senate Intelligence Committee’s chairwoman, said it’s “by far the most important oversight activity ever conducted by this committee.” According to U.S. officials, the 6,000-page report shows that the CIA misled Congress, the White House and the Justice Department and overstated the program’s success before President Obama ended it in 2009. Details of the report have not been made public. Feinstein said it’s “by far the most important oversight activity ever conducted by this committee.”
Why hasn’t the report been declassified and released?Why hasn’t the report been declassified and released?
In 2012, the committee voted to approve the study of the program and sent it to the CIA for comment. The CIA has asked for corrections in a 122-page response. The committee must vote again on a final version of the report. On Tuesday, Feinstein told reporters that she hopes to make a motion to declassify her report on the interrogation program by the end of the month. In 2012, the committee voted to approve the study of the program and sent it to the CIA for comment. The agency has asked for corrections in a 122-page response. The committee must vote again on a final version of the report. On Tuesday, Feinstein told reporters that she hopes to make a motion this month to declassify the report on the interrogation program.
What caused the latest blow-up between the committee and the CIA over the report? What caused the latest blowup between the committee and the CIA over the report?
The CIA said the committee took certain documents from a secret facility in Northern Virginia without its permission. This prompted the CIA to search the Senate computers without the knowledge of the committee. Feinstein says her committee was fully entitled to the documents and didn’t take them without the agency’s permission. This has caused a showdown, with each side claiming it is in the right. The CIA said the committee took certain documents from a secret facility in Northern Virginia without its permission. This prompted the agency to search the Senate computers without the panel’s knowledge. Feinstein said the committee was fully entitled to the documents and didn’t take them without the agency’s permission. This has caused a showdown, with each side asserting it is in the right.
What happens next? What will happen next?
The CIA has referred the incident to the Justice Department and the agency’s inspector general has opened an investigation.The CIA has referred the incident to the Justice Department and the agency’s inspector general has opened an investigation.