This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/mar/13/ministers-contempt-squeeze-public-sector-pay-nhs

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ministers accused of showing contempt with fresh squeeze on public sector pay Ministers accused of contempt for NHS with fresh squeeze on public sector pay
(about 1 hour later)
Around 600,000 NHS staff will receive a lower-than-expected pay rise after the government rejected a call for them to be awarded a 1% rise on top of automatic "progression pay" that averages around 3%.Around 600,000 NHS staff will receive a lower-than-expected pay rise after the government rejected a call for them to be awarded a 1% rise on top of automatic "progression pay" that averages around 3%.
The government has also decided that 400 "very senior managers" in the NHS, who are no longer on progression pay will receive no pay rise at all. The government also decided that 400 "very senior managers" in the NHS, who are no longer on progression pay, would receive no pay rise at all.
Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, said the government needed to press ahead with "public sector pay restraint" as he said that the decisions would save a total of £200m in the NHS budget in 2014-15 and £400m in 2015-16. Danny Alexander, the chief secretary to the Treasury, said the government needed to press ahead with public sector pay restraint and that the decisions would save £200m from the NHS budget in 2014-15 and £400m in 2015-16.
Christina McAnea, head of health at Unison, said: "This coalition government has taken a scalpel to the pay body's report and won't escape the anger of NHS staff. It's a disgrace that 70% of nurses will not even get a pay rise this year – what sort of message does this give to the value this government places on dedicated NHS staff?" The decision marks a rejection of the recommendation by the NHS pay review body for around 600,000 staff – around 55% of the total.
Unison criticised the government after it set out how it would implement pay rises for 2014-15 after it asked the pay review bodies to examine how a 1% increase could be applied to the relevant public sector workforces. Christina McAnea, head of health at Unison, said: "This coalition government has taken a scalpel to the pay body's report and won't escape the anger of NHS staff. It's a disgrace that 70% of nurses will not even get a pay rise this year – what sort of message does this give to the value this government places on dedicated NHS staff?
In addition to the NHS decision the government announced a 1% increase for members of the armed forces, contractor doctors and nurses and members of the judiciary. Departments will award a 1% increase to senior civil servants on a discretionary basis and a 1% rise will be awarded to the majority of prison officers. Police and crime commissioners will receive no increase. "The government has shown complete contempt for the NHS, contempt for staff and contempt for patients and will pay the price at the ballot box. Even a straight 1% increase would be nowhere near enough to meet the massive cost-of-living increases that NHS staff have had to cope with since 2010. Staff are on average 10% worse off than when the coalition came to power."
Alexander also announced that £1bn in employer public pension contributions will have to be paid by individual government departments rather than from the treasury's central "annually managed expenditure" pot. This will give Osborne an extra £1bn in next week's budget, which he could invest in infrastructure. But it means that individual departments will have to make a greater contribution to pensions. Peter Carter, general secretary of the Royal College of Nursing, said loyal staff were being treated with contempt.
The education department will have to pay an extra 2.3%, working out at £330m in 2015-16 and £560m in 2016-17. For the civil service it will mean an extra 2.2%, working out £275m a year from 2015-16 and onwards. For the NHS it will be a 0.3% increase, working out at £125m a year from 2015-16. He said: "The government is once again ignoring the independent pay review body, holding the Agenda for Change pay system to ransom, while expecting NHS staff to be grateful while their contractually-agreed terms of employment are torn up.
The Treasury chief secretary said of the 1% pay rises: "Public sector workers make a vital contribution to the effective delivery of public services. We need to continue with public sector pay restraint in order to put the nation's finances back on a sustainable footing. We are delivering on our commitment to a one percent pay rise for all except some of the most senior public sector workers." "Less than half of nursing staff at the top of their pay increment will get a paltry 1% rise, following three years of pay restraint. The rest will simply get what they are contractually entitled to, if they can demonstrate they have developed their skills in the previous year."
The decision on the NHS marks a rejection of the recommendation by the NHS Pay Review Body for around 600,000 staff – around 55% of the total. In a BBC interview during his trip to Israel, David Cameron was asked why he did not feel all NHS staff were worth a 1% pay rise.
Christina McAnea added: "The government has shown complete contempt for the NHS, contempt for staff and contempt for patients and will pay the price at the ballot box. Even a straight 1% increase would be nowhere near enough to meet the massive cost-of-living increases that NHS staff have had to cope with since 2010. Staff are on average 10% worse off than when the coalition came to power." Cameron replied: "NHS staff are worth a 1% pay rise and everyone in the NHS will get at least a 1% pay rise, either through the 1% raise or through the progression payments that they otherwise receive.
"But let's look at the big picture here. It is right to make difficult decisions about public sector pay. It is good that it is increasing and not frozen but it is right to take those difficult decisions because it means we can keep more people employed, we can keep more people in work and make sure we spend money on vital treatments, on hospitals, on delivering services, which is what patients so badly want."
The government set out how it would implement pay rises for 2014-15 after it asked the pay review bodies of public sector workforces to examine how a 1% increase could be applied. In addition to the NHS decision, the government announced a 1% increase for members of the armed forces, contractor doctors and nurses, and members of the judiciary. Departments will award a 1% increase to senior civil servants on a discretionary basis and a 1% rise will be awarded to the majority of prison officers. Police and crime commissioners will receive no increase.
Alexander also announced that £1bn in employer public pension contributions will have to be paid by individual government departments rather than from the Treasury's central annually managed expenditure pot. This will give Osborne an extra £1bn in next week's budget, which he could invest in infrastructure.
But it also means individual departments will have to make a greater contribution to pensions. The Department for Education will have to pay an extra 2.3%, working out at £330m in 2015-16 and £560m in 2016-17. For the civil service it will mean an extra 2.2%, working out at £275m a year from 2015-16 onwards. For the NHS it will be a 0.3% increase, working out at £125m a year from 2015-16.
The Treasury chief secretary said of the 1% pay rises: "Public sector workers make a vital contribution to the effective delivery of public services. We need to continue with public sector pay restraint in order to put the nation's finances back on a sustainable footing. We are delivering on our commitment to a 1% pay rise for all except some of the most senior public sector workers."
Downing Street suggested that public sector pay restraint would continue for years to come.
Asked how long it would last, the prime minister's official spokesman said: "We have taken difficult decisions and those will have to continue going forward and into the next parliament… We have departmental budgets set through to 2015/16 and the government has plans to deal with the deficit by 2017/18, our fiscal plans. But look, it will continue into the next parliament, yes."
Asked whether that meant public sector workers would see real terms pay-cuts for the next four years, he said: "In terms of today's announcement there were some people who received progression pay of an average of around 3%, in the NHS. I'm going to stick to what I had to say about the fact we have been clear about difficult decisions."
He also urged unions to talk to the department of health and NHS England rather than go on strike over the decision not to award a 1% pay rise to staff on progression pay.
"We have trade union legislation and a framework in which trade unions can take their decisions but the prime minister's very clear view is that he always opposes actions which gives disruption to the public,"
he said.
"I think there will be a recognition across the country that this is a difficult decision, I think everyone will understand that."