This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/15/eu-us-cheese-names-regulations

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Let them eat 'feta': why the EU should allow US cheesemongers to steal names Let them eat 'feta': why the EU should allow US cheesemongers to steal names
(6 months later)
This week, an international furor erupted over This week, an international furor erupted over the European Union’s proposal that US foodmakers be restricted from using names with historical ties to Europe including, but not limited to, Parmesan, Muenster and feta. Now it’s not very often that the cheese world has a scandal of these proportions and, yes, I am a 12-year veteran of the American “specialty” cheese industry– so Cheesegate had me thinking: maybe those Euros are right.
the Yes, I thought: Parmigiano Reggiano, regulated down to its fat content and aroma and “crust thickness”, really is a unique invention. Who are we to get all jingoistic in defending it as our own?
European Union’s proposal that US foodmakers be restricted from using names Real feta, produced in Greece from sheep and goat milk, bears no relation whatsoever to the insipid salt crumbles most of us find in American supermarkets.
with historical ties to Europe including, but not limited to, Parmesan, Muenster You can’t call Grade A beef “prime”, right? And what’s so bad about calling it “Gorgonzola-style” anyway?
and feta. Now it’s not very often that the cheese world has a scandal of these For decades, the countries that now comprise the European Union have been regulating and protecting their most one-of-a-kind foodstuffs items made with specific ingredients, following traditional recipes, produced in tight, localized environments. It was these perseverant bites of history that first seduced me into a career of cheese.
proportions and, yes, I am a 12-year veteran of the American “specialty” In addition to multiple country appellation systems, the European Union has the so-called protected designation of origin (PDO). Its function is the same, and so singular products like French Champagne made only in the Champagne region, in-bottle secondary fermentation, specific grapes, etc. are protected, in most parts of the globe, from shoddy imitation.
cheese industry so Cheesegate had But think about that: a PDO cheese is entirely different from a “name with historical ties to Europe”, right? By the logic of the regulators, we’d have to rename nearly every city and town in the Eastern United States. Our country’s legacy is one big, historical tie to Europe.
me thinking: maybe those Euros are right. “Cheddar” can be dozens of different cheeses, each tasty in its own right, but hardly consistent in age, flavor, shape or even milk. The last time I checked with the Swiss, they didn’t much care for joining the EU, and “Swiss cheese” was still a troublesome catch-all for makers trying to differentiate their own handcrafted cheeses.
Yes, I thought: Parmigiano Reggiano, There’s a reason why such generic terms were never protected in their countries of origin or in regions like Parma, Italy: they didn’t offer anything unique enough to warrant lionization.
regulated down to its fat content and aroma and “crust thickness”, really is a unique invention. Who are we to get What food monikers did offer was a reference point a gateway to innovation and that’s an even better reason why they shouldn’t be protected now.
all jingoistic in defending it as our own? In the past hundred years, the US has transformed from a collection of immigrant pockets busily producing approximations of the foods they remembered from home into the world’s largest producer and exporter of cheese. The dozen or so cheese types now up for debate, all with historical ties to Europe, have become the de facto brands for emerging markets. America was that emerging market 40 years ago, as words like “Asiago” and “fontina” became our vocabulary for speaking in cheese.
Real feta, produced in Greece from sheep Words are the building blocks of a market any market, anywhere in the world where hundreds of varieties of a given food simply aren’t part of the national culture. Which is to say, pretty much anywhere that isn’t Europe.
and goat milk, bears no relation whatsoever to the insipid salt crumbles most of It’s the laying of this foundation that enables consumers to advance, to branch out, to become experts, and to spend more money. It’s a model that’s well known in fashion (H&M) or home furnishings (Ikea): invoke the couture that consumers can’t afford or didn’t see coming, and build a lexicon for future buyers.
us find in American supermarkets. Here’s the thing about the true PDO foods of Europe: they are, by their very nature, finite. They’re protected because they are traditional handcrafted, not commodified. Five designated provinces in Italy can’t produce enough Parmigiano Reggiano for the entire world to grate, and even if they could, the costs would be too high for much of the market to bear. Which means someone needs to be making the cheese that gets new consumers in the door. Ironically, that someone could be in the EU just as easily as in the US.
You can’t call Grade A beef “prime”, right? Look no further than your own backyard for proof that it takes less than a generation to lead consumers through the gateway cheeses and turn them into discerning and committed connoisseurs. Here in the States, hundreds of cheesemakers are now making thousands of cheeses that are marketed and sold under singular names: one producer, one cheese name no Swiss, Parmesan or Brie in sight. These foods sell at two to three times the price of the generics, their sales grow by double digits each year, and it makes for good competition. A rising tide may lift all boats, but what the EU seems unable to recognize is that open-source cheese builds global consumption.
And what’s so bad about calling it “Gorgonzola-style” Plus, saying “Gorgonzola-style” or “the hard white stuff” just sounds kinda weird.
anyway?
For decades, the countries that now
comprise the European Union have been regulating and protecting their most
one-of-a-kind foodstuffs – items made with specific ingredients, following traditional
recipes, produced in tight, localized environments. It was these perseverant
bites of history that first seduced me into a career of cheese.
In addition to multiple country appellation
systems, the European Union has the so-called protected designation of origin
(PDO). Its function is the same, and so singular products like French Champagne
– made only in the Champagne region, in-bottle secondary fermentation, specific
grapes, etc. – are protected, in most parts of the globe, from shoddy
imitation.
But think about that: a PDO cheese is
entirely different from a “name with historical ties to Europe”, right? By the
logic of the regulators, we’d have to rename nearly every city and town in the
Eastern United States. Our country’s legacy is one big, historical
tie to Europe.
“Cheddar” can be dozens of different
cheeses, each tasty in its own right, but hardly consistent in age, flavor,
shape or even milk. The last time I checked with the Swiss, they didn’t much care
for joining the EU, and “Swiss cheese” was still a troublesome catch-all for makers
trying to differentiate their own handcrafted cheeses.
There’s a reason why such generic terms were
never protected in their countries of origin or in regions like Parma, Italy: they
didn’t offer anything unique enough to warrant lionization.
What food monikers did offer was a
reference point – a gateway to innovation – and that’s an even better reason why
they shouldn’t be protected now.
In the past hundred years, the US has transformed
from a collection of immigrant pockets busily producing approximations of the
foods they remembered from home into the world’s largest producer – and
exporter – of cheese. The dozen or so cheese types now up for debate, all with
historical ties to Europe, have become the de facto brands for emerging
markets. America was that emerging market
40 years ago, as words like “Asiago” and “fontina” became our vocabulary for
speaking in cheese.
Words are the building blocks of a market –
any market, anywhere in the world where hundreds of varieties of a given food
simply aren’t part of the national culture. Which is to say, pretty much
anywhere that isn’t Europe.
It’s the laying of this foundation that
enables consumers to advance, to branch out, to become experts, and to spend
more money. It’s a model that’s well known in fashion (H&M) or home
furnishings (Ikea): invoke the couture that consumers can’t afford or didn’t
see coming, and build a lexicon for future buyers.
Here’s the thing about the true PDO foods
of Europe: they are, by their very nature, finite. They’re protected because they are traditional – handcrafted, not commodified. Five
designated provinces in Italy can’t produce enough Parmigiano Reggiano for the
entire world to grate, and even if they could, the costs would be too high for
much of the market to bear. Which means someone needs to be making the cheese
that gets new consumers in the door. Ironically, that someone could be in the EU
just as easily as in the US.
Look no further than your own backyard for
proof that it takes less than a generation to lead consumers through the gateway
cheeses and turn them into discerning and committed connoisseurs. Here in the
States, hundreds of cheesemakers are now making thousands of cheeses that are
marketed and sold under singular names: one producer, one cheese name – no
Swiss, Parmesan or Brie in sight. These foods sell at two to three times the
price of the generics, their sales grow by double digits each year, and it makes
for good competition. A rising tide may lift all boats, but what the EU seems
unable to recognize is that open-source cheese builds global consumption.
Plus, saying “Gorgonzola-style” or “the
hard white stuff” just sounds kinda weird.