This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/mar/17/six-things-toxic-trail-superfund-investigation
The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Six things you should know about CIR’s Superfund investigation | Six things you should know about CIR’s Superfund investigation |
(35 minutes later) | |
Our | Our |
investigation tells the story of the toxic trail of unintended | investigation tells the story of the toxic trail of unintended |
consequences left behind by the landmark federal Superfund program. | consequences left behind by the landmark federal Superfund program. |
It’s | It’s |
a complicated story to report and tell. The Environmental Protection | a complicated story to report and tell. The Environmental Protection |
Agency doesn’t track these side effects. It considers them too | Agency doesn’t track these side effects. It considers them too |
difficult to measure. Companies, meanwhile, aren’t required to | difficult to measure. Companies, meanwhile, aren’t required to |
report where they send their waste. | report where they send their waste. |
In many cases, | In many cases, |
data is incomplete or nonexistent. That forced us to piece together a | data is incomplete or nonexistent. That forced us to piece together a |
story based on the best available documents, data, studies and scores | story based on the best available documents, data, studies and scores |
of interviews. | of interviews. |
Here are six | Here are six |
important things to know about the reporting and storytelling. | important things to know about the reporting and storytelling. |
1. Our | 1. Our |
story doesn’t cover the entire Superfund program | story doesn’t cover the entire Superfund program |
There are | There are |
more than 1,300 toxic waste sites in the Superfund program. | more than 1,300 toxic waste sites in the Superfund program. |
We | We |
zoomed in on a specific type of site. Scientific jargon alert: they’re called complex groundwater sites, which are | zoomed in on a specific type of site. Scientific jargon alert: they’re called complex groundwater sites, which are |
polluted | polluted |
with volatile | with volatile |
organic compounds. What that means: the groundwater is | organic compounds. What that means: the groundwater is |
contaminated with | contaminated with |
hard-to-clean chemicals. Cleanup is complicated further by the fact | hard-to-clean chemicals. Cleanup is complicated further by the fact |
that the ground underneath often is made up of many different types | that the ground underneath often is made up of many different types |
of soil and rock. | of soil and rock. |
These | These |
account for roughly 850 Superfund sites. From there, we zoomed in | account for roughly 850 Superfund sites. From there, we zoomed in |
even further to focus only on those using a specific type of | even further to focus only on those using a specific type of |
treatment, called “pump | treatment, called “pump |
and treat”. | and treat”. |
There are two | There are two |
reasons why we focused on these sites. First, the technology used to | reasons why we focused on these sites. First, the technology used to |
clean them up is outdated and, in many cases, no longer effective. | clean them up is outdated and, in many cases, no longer effective. |
Second, the cleanup contributes tons of waste to the toxic trail | Second, the cleanup contributes tons of waste to the toxic trail |
every year. That means the effort can ultimately be for naught. | every year. That means the effort can ultimately be for naught. |
There | There |
are more than 450 sites like this – or about one-third of all | are more than 450 sites like this – or about one-third of all |
Superfund sites. Many of the other sites don’t contribute to any | Superfund sites. Many of the other sites don’t contribute to any |
toxic trail. They treat the waste on-site | toxic trail. They treat the waste on-site |
or use preventive | or use preventive |
measures to keep the pollution contained. | measures to keep the pollution contained. |
2. You | 2. You |
can’t directly track Superfund waste beyond one step of the trail | can’t directly track Superfund waste beyond one step of the trail |
But you can | But you can |
track it step by step along the way to create an overall picture of | track it step by step along the way to create an overall picture of |
the toxic trail. | the toxic trail. |
Once | Once |
waste leaves a cleanup site, it can go to one of thousands of | waste leaves a cleanup site, it can go to one of thousands of |
treatment plants across the country. At those plants, the waste gets | treatment plants across the country. At those plants, the waste gets |
combined and treated with hazardous waste and other junk from all | combined and treated with hazardous waste and other junk from all |
over the country. | over the country. |
On | On |
the other end, new waste gets created from that mix | the other end, new waste gets created from that mix |
at treatment | at treatment |
plants. In turn, it can then go to any number of sites, and so on and | plants. In turn, it can then go to any number of sites, and so on and |
so on. You can’t paint one fleck of chemical from Silicon Valley | so on. You can’t paint one fleck of chemical from Silicon Valley |
red and track it through the system. But we showed the many different | red and track it through the system. But we showed the many different |
trails it can take. | trails it can take. |
3. | 3. |
Available data and documentation is spotty | Available data and documentation is spotty |
We often | We often |
couldn’t get complete information for the system as a whole. We did | couldn’t get complete information for the system as a whole. We did |
find individual reports and data that provided windows into it. They | find individual reports and data that provided windows into it. They |
helped us quantify problems and take a unique look into how these | helped us quantify problems and take a unique look into how these |
systems operate. | systems operate. |
We | We |
focused heavily on the Calgon Carbon Corporation’s treatment plant in | focused heavily on the Calgon Carbon Corporation’s treatment plant in |
Kentucky, for example. We didn’t have complete figures on its | Kentucky, for example. We didn’t have complete figures on its |
carbon footprint. There were, however, well-documented estimates for | carbon footprint. There were, however, well-documented estimates for |
greenhouse gas emissions for a similar plant in Arizona. So we used | greenhouse gas emissions for a similar plant in Arizona. So we used |
that to compile a composite picture of the carbon footprint along one | that to compile a composite picture of the carbon footprint along one |
leg of this toxic trail. | leg of this toxic trail. |
4. There | 4. There |
are thousands of other sites like these outside of the Superfund | are thousands of other sites like these outside of the Superfund |
program | program |
These are | These are |
overseen by local, state and other federal agencies, and many face | overseen by local, state and other federal agencies, and many face |
similar challenges. We didn’t dig into the efforts underway at | similar challenges. We didn’t dig into the efforts underway at |
these sites. Instead, we tracked a single type of waste leaving the | these sites. Instead, we tracked a single type of waste leaving the |
Silicon Valley site. | Silicon Valley site. |
5. Lots of | 5. Lots of |
people live around these sites | people live around these sites |
In | In |
many cases, hundreds or even thousands of people live within a mile | many cases, hundreds or even thousands of people live within a mile |
of a Superfund site. Nearly half | of a Superfund site. Nearly half |
of all Americans | of all Americans |
live within 10 miles of a Superfund site. | live within 10 miles of a Superfund site. |
The city of | The city of |
Mountain View, California, for example, is home to 75,000 people. They | Mountain View, California, for example, is home to 75,000 people. They |
live above and around 13 Superfund sites. Here, people are | live above and around 13 Superfund sites. Here, people are |
understandably concerned about exposure risks and want to see the | understandably concerned about exposure risks and want to see the |
sites cleaned, | sites cleaned, |
regardless of the | regardless of the |
method. | method. |
The level of | The level of |
danger depends at each site. | danger depends at each site. |
In | In |
some cases, keeping contaminated groundwater out of the mouths of | some cases, keeping contaminated groundwater out of the mouths of |
nearby residents is all that is required. But in others, there are | nearby residents is all that is required. But in others, there are |
concerns that nearby residents could be breathing in toxic vapors or | concerns that nearby residents could be breathing in toxic vapors or |
radiation. The EPA’s website generally lays out the risks at each | radiation. The EPA’s website generally lays out the risks at each |
site using a 1-5 star system. One star means “beware” and five | site using a 1-5 star system. One star means “beware” and five |
stars means “don’t worry.” You can find this information for | stars means “don’t worry.” You can find this information for |
every site on the EPA’s | every site on the EPA’s |
Superfund Site Information search page. | Superfund Site Information search page. |
Yet, as our | Yet, as our |
story showed, in many cases cleanup goals aren’t being achieved. | story showed, in many cases cleanup goals aren’t being achieved. |
And the risk of exposure is often limited. | And the risk of exposure is often limited. |
6. We used | 6. We used |
“Silicon Valley” as shorthand for the site we focused on. But | “Silicon Valley” as shorthand for the site we focused on. But |
there are more than two dozen Superfund sites in Silicon Valley | there are more than two dozen Superfund sites in Silicon Valley |
alone | alone |
The | The |
area we focused on is a collection of three sites known as the | area we focused on is a collection of three sites known as the |
Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman | Middlefield-Ellis-Whisman |
Study Area, or MEW for short. But that wasn’t fun to read or write. | Study Area, or MEW for short. But that wasn’t fun to read or write. |
So we called it some variation of “the Silicon Valley site” | So we called it some variation of “the Silicon Valley site” |
throughout the story. | throughout the story. |
There | There |
are more Superfund sites in Silicon Valley’s Santa Clara County | are more Superfund sites in Silicon Valley’s Santa Clara County |
– | – |
23 – | 23 – |
than any other county in the United States. These are the only | than any other county in the United States. These are the only |
visible remnants of what was once a manufacturing hub for a | visible remnants of what was once a manufacturing hub for a |
burgeoning tech industry. | burgeoning tech industry. |
There | There |
are two reasons why we homed in on this site. First, it’s where we | are two reasons why we homed in on this site. First, it’s where we |
started our reporting more than a year ago, asking questions after | started our reporting more than a year ago, asking questions after |
toxic | toxic |
vapors leaked into office buildings. | vapors leaked into office buildings. |
Second, the | Second, the |
site has been studied extensively. This left behind a lengthy paper | site has been studied extensively. This left behind a lengthy paper |
trail that details how much waste has been removed, the pollution | trail that details how much waste has been removed, the pollution |
levels and cost estimates. These bits of information allowed us to | levels and cost estimates. These bits of information allowed us to |
tell a more nuanced and complete story about the cleanup effort and | tell a more nuanced and complete story about the cleanup effort and |
its shortcomings. | its shortcomings. |
This | This |
story was produced by the independent, nonprofit Center for | story was produced by the independent, nonprofit Center for |
Investigative Reporting, the country’s largest investigative | Investigative Reporting, the country’s largest investigative |
reporting team. For more, visit cironline.org. Rust can be reached at srust@cironline.org. Drange can be reached at mdrange@cironline.org. | |