This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-26645400
The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Zuma's South African Nkandla home upgrade 'unethical' | Zuma's South African Nkandla home upgrade 'unethical' |
(35 minutes later) | |
South Africa's top corruption fighter has said President Jacob Zuma has "benefited unduly" from using state money to improve his rural residence. | South Africa's top corruption fighter has said President Jacob Zuma has "benefited unduly" from using state money to improve his rural residence. |
The changes to Mr Zuma's private home, including a pool and cattle enclosure, cost taxpayers about $23m (£13.8m). | |
In a more than 400-page report, Public Protector Thuli Madonsela accused Mr Zuma of unethical conduct. | |
She said that Mr Zuma, who faces re-election in May, should repay costs for some of the unnecessary renovations. | She said that Mr Zuma, who faces re-election in May, should repay costs for some of the unnecessary renovations. |
The refurbishment of the residence in Nkandla, in Mr Zuma's home province of KwaZulu-Natal, has turned into a major political controversy in South Africa. | The refurbishment of the residence in Nkandla, in Mr Zuma's home province of KwaZulu-Natal, has turned into a major political controversy in South Africa. |
Correspondents say it was one of the reasons why Mr Zuma was booed in December at the memorial service for Nelson Mandela, South Africa's first black president. | |
Ms Madonsela, South Africa's ombudsman, said the cost of the Nkandla upgrades were 215m South African rand ($20m; £12m) at end of her investigation and were now estimated at 246m rand. | |
"The president tacitly accepted the implementation of all measures at his residence and has unduly benefited from the enormous capital investment in the non-security installations at his private residence," the report said. | |
However, while it could be "legitimately construed" that Mr Zuma misled parliament over the renovations, the report said it was a "bona fide mistake". | |
Ms Madonsela said Mr Zuma had 14 days to respond to her report before parliament. |