This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/education/7068932.stm

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
U-turn on school surplus clawback U-turn on school surplus clawback
(about 2 hours later)
The government has dropped plans to have councils claw back budget surpluses from schools in England.The government has dropped plans to have councils claw back budget surpluses from schools in England.
Ministers had proposed a 5% levy on excess cash held by schools - said to total £1.7bn - backdated to March.Ministers had proposed a 5% levy on excess cash held by schools - said to total £1.7bn - backdated to March.
The move, put out for consultation in March and confirmed in June, angered many head teachers and governors though some teachers' unions supported it.The move, put out for consultation in March and confirmed in June, angered many head teachers and governors though some teachers' unions supported it.
Now ministers have dropped the plan - but warn they may act in future if excessive surpluses are not reduced.Now ministers have dropped the plan - but warn they may act in future if excessive surpluses are not reduced.
The Department for Children, Schools and Families defines "excessive" as more than 5% of a secondary school budget and more than 8% for a primary or special school, after taking into account money committed to specific projects.The Department for Children, Schools and Families defines "excessive" as more than 5% of a secondary school budget and more than 8% for a primary or special school, after taking into account money committed to specific projects.
It says 38% of schools have such excessive balances.
The proposals however would have applied to all schools with a surplus at the end of the financial year, however small.The proposals however would have applied to all schools with a surplus at the end of the financial year, however small.
The local authority would have taken 5% of all these surpluses then shared out the resulting pot.The local authority would have taken 5% of all these surpluses then shared out the resulting pot.
Challenging Gordon Brown on the issue at Prime Minister's Questions last week, Tory leader David Cameron said: "Why do you think you know best how to spend this money, rather than the head teachers?"
Education minister Jim Knight had suggested the retrospective element of the move alone might be dropped.Education minister Jim Knight had suggested the retrospective element of the move alone might be dropped.
This aspect had caused particular annoyance, because it could have meant schools being penalised for having had a surplus months ago even if they had since spent it.This aspect had caused particular annoyance, because it could have meant schools being penalised for having had a surplus months ago even if they had since spent it.
ConcernsConcerns
In a statement to the Commons, Mr Knight has now said he recognises schools' reasonable concerns. In a statement to the Commons, Mr Knight has now gone further, and said he recognised schools' reasonable concerns.
This daft idea should never have seen the light of day Lib Dem spokesman David Laws Among these were the fact that the proposal would have applied to all revenue surpluses - and could include the proceeds of fundraising by parents, as well as small amounts prudently carried forward from one year to the next.This daft idea should never have seen the light of day Lib Dem spokesman David Laws Among these were the fact that the proposal would have applied to all revenue surpluses - and could include the proceeds of fundraising by parents, as well as small amounts prudently carried forward from one year to the next.
"Rather than proceed now we will continue to discuss these detailed concerns with schools and work with local authorities to lower excessive surplus revenue balances," he said."Rather than proceed now we will continue to discuss these detailed concerns with schools and work with local authorities to lower excessive surplus revenue balances," he said.
He warned that the department would continue to monitor surplus balances during the forthcoming three-year spending review period.He warned that the department would continue to monitor surplus balances during the forthcoming three-year spending review period.
"If the levels reported do not show a significant reduction we will come forward with further action, having resolved the technical issues, for implementation during the following spending review period," he said."If the levels reported do not show a significant reduction we will come forward with further action, having resolved the technical issues, for implementation during the following spending review period," he said.
The Liberal Democrat education spokesman David Laws said: "This daft idea should never have seen the light of day.The Liberal Democrat education spokesman David Laws said: "This daft idea should never have seen the light of day.
"Ministers must now come clean and accept that these proposals were wrong, and assure schools that they will not seek to resurrect them in a year's time when the row has died down.""Ministers must now come clean and accept that these proposals were wrong, and assure schools that they will not seek to resurrect them in a year's time when the row has died down."
Shadow Schools Minister Nick Gibb said the "partial climbdown" left open the possiblity of future raids on school budgets.
"By leaving open the possibility of punishing schools that budget carefully it looks like their recipe for hasty end of year spending rather than long term thinking remains alive.
"The government should have ruled out this plan to penalise prudent schools altogether but their instinct for top-down direction is still as strong as ever."
'Disappointing''Disappointing'
National Governors? Association chief executive Phil Revell said it did not oppose clawback in principle and schools with surpluses should have to justify them. National Governors' Association chief executive Phil Revell said it did not oppose clawback in principle.
"Many schools are in fact building funds for specific projects, but there are too many examples of unidentified funds being held in reserve from year to year.""Many schools are in fact building funds for specific projects, but there are too many examples of unidentified funds being held in reserve from year to year."
But he said: "The problem this year has been the retrospective nature of the government's original proposals, alongside insufficient guidance to schools and local authorities about how essential reserve balances could be identified." NASUWT teachers' union general secretary Chris Keates said: "This was never going to be a universally popular move and vociferous discontent from those with vested interests could have been anticipated," she said.
NASUWT teachers' union general secretary Chris Keates said it was "extremely disappointing" that the government was putting off tackling the issue.
"This was never going to be a universally popular move and vociferous discontent from those with vested interests could have been anticipated," she said.
"Parents should now be asking why a situation has been allowed to develop where their children could actually leave their primary or secondary school without ever having received their full funding entitlement.""Parents should now be asking why a situation has been allowed to develop where their children could actually leave their primary or secondary school without ever having received their full funding entitlement."
The Association of School and College Leaders welcomed the government's change of heart.
General secretary John Dunford said: "The issues around the minority of schools that retain large uncommitted balances are real and important, but there are already measures in place to address the issue locally."