This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/25/egypt-lawyers-boycott-mass-trial
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Egyptian lawyers boycott mass trial in protest at death sentences | Egyptian lawyers boycott mass trial in protest at death sentences |
(35 minutes later) | |
Lawyers in southern Egypt boycotted a mass trial of 683 people on Tuesday in protest at the death sentences given to 529 others in a separate case at the same court a day earlier. | Lawyers in southern Egypt boycotted a mass trial of 683 people on Tuesday in protest at the death sentences given to 529 others in a separate case at the same court a day earlier. |
Judge Saeed Youssef Elgazar took just two court sessions to find the 529 guilty over the murder last August of a policeman. The local lawyers' syndicate collectively stayed away from Tuesday's proceedings, which Elgazar went ahead with regardless – a decision defence lawyers said was illegal. | Judge Saeed Youssef Elgazar took just two court sessions to find the 529 guilty over the murder last August of a policeman. The local lawyers' syndicate collectively stayed away from Tuesday's proceedings, which Elgazar went ahead with regardless – a decision defence lawyers said was illegal. |
"I have never seen anything like this in all my life as a lawyer," said Adel Aly, one of the defence counsel who chose not to attend Tuesday's trial of defendants including the head of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamed Badie. | "I have never seen anything like this in all my life as a lawyer," said Adel Aly, one of the defence counsel who chose not to attend Tuesday's trial of defendants including the head of the Muslim Brotherhood, Mohamed Badie. |
Another lawyer involved in the boycott, Ahmed Shabeeb, said: "His [Elgazar's] decision infringed all the procedures guaranteed by law and the constitution – as if he wanted to say that he's the uppermost god." | Another lawyer involved in the boycott, Ahmed Shabeeb, said: "His [Elgazar's] decision infringed all the procedures guaranteed by law and the constitution – as if he wanted to say that he's the uppermost god." |
According to local media, Elgazar has a history of controversial judgments, most prominently in January last year when he acquitted policemen accused of murdering protesters during the 2011 revolution. | According to local media, Elgazar has a history of controversial judgments, most prominently in January last year when he acquitted policemen accused of murdering protesters during the 2011 revolution. |
Further draconian sentences were avoided as Tuesday's trial was adjourned until 28 April. But violence broke out in Minya, the southern city where both trials took place, as students clashed with police. The head of the local student union said some protesters had been hit by police shotgun pellets. Clashes were also reported in the northern city of Alexandria. | Further draconian sentences were avoided as Tuesday's trial was adjourned until 28 April. But violence broke out in Minya, the southern city where both trials took place, as students clashed with police. The head of the local student union said some protesters had been hit by police shotgun pellets. Clashes were also reported in the northern city of Alexandria. |
The death sentences sparked global outcry, culminating in the UN's human rights office judging that the case had breached international law. "A mass trial of 529 people conducted over just two days cannot possibly have met even the most basic requirements for a fair trial," said the UN's human rights spokesman, Rupert Colville. | The death sentences sparked global outcry, culminating in the UN's human rights office judging that the case had breached international law. "A mass trial of 529 people conducted over just two days cannot possibly have met even the most basic requirements for a fair trial," said the UN's human rights spokesman, Rupert Colville. |
But reaction in Egypt was more mixed. The identities of the 529 are not all known, but many Egyptians assume they are all supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood, the group behind the ousted president Mohamed Morsi. Many in Egypt instinctively blame the Brotherhood for all new outbursts of violence, and so some feel the 529 deserved their punishment. | But reaction in Egypt was more mixed. The identities of the 529 are not all known, but many Egyptians assume they are all supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood, the group behind the ousted president Mohamed Morsi. Many in Egypt instinctively blame the Brotherhood for all new outbursts of violence, and so some feel the 529 deserved their punishment. |
One lawyer from the area, Ali Delgawy, said: "They're liars, so they deserve whatever happens to them." | One lawyer from the area, Ali Delgawy, said: "They're liars, so they deserve whatever happens to them." |
Both state and private media have consistently backed the actions of the post-Morsi regime, and Monday's trial was no exception. "Today, we got justice, the justice that we want. We are tired of your violence. We will build the country despite your war," said Rania Badawy, a presenter on the private Tahrir channel. | Both state and private media have consistently backed the actions of the post-Morsi regime, and Monday's trial was no exception. "Today, we got justice, the justice that we want. We are tired of your violence. We will build the country despite your war," said Rania Badawy, a presenter on the private Tahrir channel. |
A presenter for the Sada al-Balad channel, Ahmed Moussa, said: "I salute the fairness and justice of our judiciary in defiance of those killers, and all those who attack it. Egypt's judiciary is clean and fair." | A presenter for the Sada al-Balad channel, Ahmed Moussa, said: "I salute the fairness and justice of our judiciary in defiance of those killers, and all those who attack it. Egypt's judiciary is clean and fair." |
Analysts argued that while the judgment may have been made independently, Egypt's judiciary was not a neutral institution. "Parts of the judicial apparatus are fully on board with the new repressive order, at least for now," said Nathan Brown, a professor at George Washington University. But, he added: "I think it is more a matter of a common mentality than direct co-ordination." | |
Additional reporting by Manu Abdo | Additional reporting by Manu Abdo |