This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/07/climate-change-violence-occupy-earth

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Call climate change what it is: violence Call climate change what it is: violence
(about 3 hours later)
IfIf
you're poor, the only way you're likely to injure someone is the oldyou're poor, the only way you're likely to injure someone is the old
traditional way: artisanal violence, we could call it – by hands, by knife, bytraditional way: artisanal violence, we could call it – by hands, by knife, by
club, or maybe modern hands-on violence, by gun or by car.club, or maybe modern hands-on violence, by gun or by car.
But if you'reBut if you're
tremendously wealthy, you can practice industrial-scale violence without anytremendously wealthy, you can practice industrial-scale violence without any
manual labor on your own part. You can, say, build a sweatshop factory thatmanual labor on your own part. You can, say, build a sweatshop factory that
will collapse in Bangladesh and kill more people than any hands-on masswill collapse in Bangladesh and kill more people than any hands-on mass
murderer ever did, or you can calculate risk and benefit about putting poisonsmurderer ever did, or you can calculate risk and benefit about putting poisons
or unsafe machines into the world, as manufacturers do every day. Ifor unsafe machines into the world, as manufacturers do every day. If
you're the leader of a country, you can declare war and kill by the hundreds ofyou're the leader of a country, you can declare war and kill by the hundreds of
thousands or millions. And the nuclear superpowers – the US and Russia – still holdthousands or millions. And the nuclear superpowers – the US and Russia – still hold
the option of destroying quite a lot of life on Earth.the option of destroying quite a lot of life on Earth.
So doSo do
the carbon barons. But when we talk about violence, we almost always talk aboutthe carbon barons. But when we talk about violence, we almost always talk about
violence from below, not above.violence from below, not above.
Or so I thought when I received a press releaseOr so I thought when I received a press release
last week from a climate group announcing that "scientists say there is a direct link between changing climate and anlast week from a climate group announcing that "scientists say there is a direct link between changing climate and an
increase in violence". What the scientists actually said, in aincrease in violence". What the scientists actually said, in a
not-so-newsworthy article in Nature two and a half years ago, is that there is higher conflictnot-so-newsworthy article in Nature two and a half years ago, is that there is higher conflict
in the tropics in El Nino years, and that perhaps this will scale up to makein the tropics in El Nino years, and that perhaps this will scale up to make
our age of climate change also an era of civil and international conflict.our age of climate change also an era of civil and international conflict.
TheThe
message is that ordinary people will behave badly in an era of intensifiedmessage is that ordinary people will behave badly in an era of intensified
climate change.climate change.
All this makes sense, unless you go back to theAll this makes sense, unless you go back to the
premise and note that climate change is itself violence. Extreme, horrific,premise and note that climate change is itself violence. Extreme, horrific,
longterm, widespread violence.longterm, widespread violence.
Climate change is anthropogenic – caused by humanClimate change is anthropogenic – caused by human
beings, some much more than others. We know the consequences of that change:beings, some much more than others. We know the consequences of that change:
the acidification of oceans and decline of many species in them, the slow disappearancethe acidification of oceans and decline of many species in them, the slow disappearance
of island nations such as the Maldives, increased flooding, drought, cropof island nations such as the Maldives, increased flooding, drought, crop
failure leading to food-price increases and famine, increasingly turbulentfailure leading to food-price increases and famine, increasingly turbulent
weather. (Think Hurricane Sandy and the recent typhoon in the Philippines, andweather. (Think Hurricane Sandy and the recent typhoon in the Philippines, and
heat waves that kill elderly people by the tens of thousands.)heat waves that kill elderly people by the tens of thousands.)
Climate change isClimate change is
violence.violence.
So if we want to talk about violence and climateSo if we want to talk about violence and climate
change – and we are talking about it, after last week's horrifying report from the world's top climate scientists – then let's talk about climate change as violence. Rather than worrying aboutchange – and we are talking about it, after last week's horrifying report from the world's top climate scientists – then let's talk about climate change as violence. Rather than worrying about
whether ordinary human beings will react turbulently to the destruction of thewhether ordinary human beings will react turbulently to the destruction of the
very means of their survival, let's worry about that destruction – and theirvery means of their survival, let's worry about that destruction – and their
survival. Of course water failure, crop failure, flooding and more will lead to mass migration and climate refugees – they already have – andsurvival. Of course water failure, crop failure, flooding and more will lead to mass migration and climate refugees – they already have – and
this will lead to conflict. Those conflicts are being set in motion now.this will lead to conflict. Those conflicts are being set in motion now.
You can regard the Arab Spring, in part, as a climateYou can regard the Arab Spring, in part, as a climate
conflict: the increase in wheat prices was one of the triggers for that series ofconflict: the increase in wheat prices was one of the triggers for that series of
revolts that changed the face of northernmost Africa and the Middle East. On the one hand, you can say, how nice if those people had not been hungry in therevolts that changed the face of northernmost Africa and the Middle East. On the one hand, you can say, how nice if those people had not been hungry in the
first place. On the other, how can you not say, how great is it that those people stood upfirst place. On the other, how can you not say, how great is it that those people stood up
against being deprived of sustenance and hope? And then you have to look at theagainst being deprived of sustenance and hope? And then you have to look at the
systems that created that hunger - the enormous economic inequalities insystems that created that hunger - the enormous economic inequalities in
places such as Egypt and the brutality used to keep down the people at theplaces such as Egypt and the brutality used to keep down the people at the
lower levels of the social system, as well as the weather.lower levels of the social system, as well as the weather.
People revolt when their lives are unbearable.People revolt when their lives are unbearable.
Sometimes material reality creates that unbearableness: droughts, plagues, storms, floods. But food and medical care, health and well-being, access to housing andSometimes material reality creates that unbearableness: droughts, plagues, storms, floods. But food and medical care, health and well-being, access to housing and
education – these things are also governed by economic means and government policy. That's what the revolt called Occupy Wall Street was against.education – these things are also governed by economic means and government policy. That's what the revolt called Occupy Wall Street was against.
Climate changeClimate change
will increase hunger as food prices rise and food production falters, but wewill increase hunger as food prices rise and food production falters, but we
already have widespread hunger on Earth, and much of it is due not to thealready have widespread hunger on Earth, and much of it is due not to the
failures of nature and farmers, but to systems of distribution. Almost 16m children in the United States now live with hunger, according to the USfailures of nature and farmers, but to systems of distribution. Almost 16m children in the United States now live with hunger, according to the US
Department of Agriculture, and that is not because the vast, agriculturallyDepartment of Agriculture, and that is not because the vast, agriculturally
rich United States cannot produce enough to feed all of us. We are a countryrich United States cannot produce enough to feed all of us. We are a country
whose distribution system is itself a kind of violence.whose distribution system is itself a kind of violence.
Climate change is not suddenly bringing about anClimate change is not suddenly bringing about an
era of equitable distribution. I suspect people will be revolting in the comingera of equitable distribution. I suspect people will be revolting in the coming
future against what they revolted against in the past: the injustices of thefuture against what they revolted against in the past: the injustices of the
system. They should revolt, and we should be glad they do, if not system. They should revolt, and we should be glad they do, if not so glad that they need to. (Though one can hope they'll recognize that violence is not necessarily where their power lies.) One of the events prompting the French
that they need to (though hope they will recognize that violence is not necessarily where their power lies). One of the events prompting the French
Revolution was the failure of the 1788 wheat crop, which made bread prices skyrocketRevolution was the failure of the 1788 wheat crop, which made bread prices skyrocket
and the poor go hungry. The insurance against such events is often thought toand the poor go hungry. The insurance against such events is often thought to
be more authoritarianism and more threats against the poor, but that's only anbe more authoritarianism and more threats against the poor, but that's only an
attempt to keep a lid on what's boiling over; the other way to go is to turnattempt to keep a lid on what's boiling over; the other way to go is to turn
down the heat.down the heat.
The same week during which I received that ill-thought-out press release about climate and violence, Exxon Mobil Corporation issued a policy report. It makes for boring reading, unless you canThe same week during which I received that ill-thought-out press release about climate and violence, Exxon Mobil Corporation issued a policy report. It makes for boring reading, unless you can
make the dry language of business into pictures of the consequences of thosemake the dry language of business into pictures of the consequences of those
acts undertaken for profit. Exxon says:acts undertaken for profit. Exxon says:
We are confidentWe are confident
that none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become 'stranded'. Wethat none of our hydrocarbon reserves are now or will become 'stranded'. We
believe producing these assets is essential to meeting growing energy demandbelieve producing these assets is essential to meeting growing energy demand
worldwide.worldwide.
Stranded assets that mean carbon assets – coal, oil, gas stillStranded assets that mean carbon assets – coal, oil, gas still
underground – would become worthless if we decided they could not be extractedunderground – would become worthless if we decided they could not be extracted
and burned in the near future. Because scientists say that we need to leaveand burned in the near future. Because scientists say that we need to leave
most of the world's known carbon reserves in the ground if we are to go for themost of the world's known carbon reserves in the ground if we are to go for the
milder rather than the more extreme versions of climate change. Under themilder rather than the more extreme versions of climate change. Under the
milder version, countless more people – species, places – will survive. In the best-case scenario, we damage the Earth less. We are currently wrangling about how much tomilder version, countless more people – species, places – will survive. In the best-case scenario, we damage the Earth less. We are currently wrangling about how much to
devastate the Earth.devastate the Earth.
In every arena, we need to look at industrial-scale andIn every arena, we need to look at industrial-scale and
systemic violence, not just the hands-on violence of the less powerful. Whensystemic violence, not just the hands-on violence of the less powerful. When
it comes to climate change, this is particularly true. Exxon has decided to betit comes to climate change, this is particularly true. Exxon has decided to bet
that we can't make the corporation keep its reserves in the ground, and the company isthat we can't make the corporation keep its reserves in the ground, and the company is
reassuring its investors that it will continue to profit off the rapid,reassuring its investors that it will continue to profit off the rapid,
violent and intentional destruction of the Earth.violent and intentional destruction of the Earth.
That's a tired phrase, the destruction of the Earth, butThat's a tired phrase, the destruction of the Earth, but
translate it into the face of a starving child and a barren field – and thentranslate it into the face of a starving child and a barren field – and then
multiply that a few million times. Or just picture the tiny bivalves: scallops,multiply that a few million times. Or just picture the tiny bivalves: scallops,
oysters, Arctic sea snails that can't form shells in acidifying oceans rightoysters, Arctic sea snails that can't form shells in acidifying oceans right
now. Or another superstorm tearing apart another city. Climate change is global-scale violence, against places and species asnow. Or another superstorm tearing apart another city. Climate change is global-scale violence, against places and species as
well as against human beings. Once we call it by name, we can start having a realwell as against human beings. Once we call it by name, we can start having a real
conversation about our priorities and values. Because the revolt against brutality begins with a revolt against the language that hides that brutality.conversation about our priorities and values. Because the revolt against brutality begins with a revolt against the language that hides that brutality.