This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/fca-insurance-probe-leak-should-not-divert-attention-from-life-insurers-own-failings-9246948.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
FCA insurance probe leak should not divert attention from life insurers’ own failings FCA insurance probe leak should not divert attention from life insurers’ own failings
(about 7 hours later)
OUTLOOK: Called before the Treasury Committee, the boss of the Association of British Insurers portrayed himself as the voice of sweet reason while wielding a dagger. OUTLOOK: Called before the Treasury Select Committee, the boss of the Association of British Insurers portrayed himself as the voice of sweet reason, while wielding a dagger.
Ostensibly Otto Thoresen was in front of MPs to talk about the budget and the Chancellor’s removal of one the industry’s favourite cash cows by getting rid of the demand that people buy an annuity with their pension savings to provide income in their retirement. Ostensibly Otto Thoresen was in front of MPs to talk about the Budget and the Chancellor’s removal of one the industry’s favourite cash cows, by getting rid of the demand that people buy an annuity with their pension savings.
But he knew committee members would be far more interested in hearing his line on the Financial Conduct Authority’s spectacular mishandling of the announcement of its investigation into 30m old life insurance policies, which caused a panic on the stock market last month when it appeared in a  newspaper interview. But he knew committee members would be far more interested in hearing his line on the Financial Conduct Authority’s spectacular mishandling of the announcement of its investigation into 30 million old life insurance policies, which caused a panic on the stock market when it appeared in a newspaper interview.
In anticipation that the review would be front and centre, Mr Thoresen was well prepared. He claimed to be in favour of the review while talking regretfully about the harm done to the “relationship of trust” he said was needed between industry, regulators and Government.  Mr Thoresen was well prepared. He talked regretfully about the harm done to the “relationship of trust” he said was needed between industry, regulators and government. Dabbing a metaphorical tissue to his eye, he went on to insist that he wasn’t calling for “heads to roll”, despite the siren calls for the resignation of FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley coming from his members and perhaps some of his staff too (albeit privately). That was the sweet reason.
Dabbing a metaphorical tissue to his eye, he nonetheless went on to insist that he wasn’t calling for “heads to roll” despite the siren calls for the resignation of FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley made by his members and perhaps by some of his staff privately too. That was the sweet reason.  The dagger was wielded by means of the story he told about the way the review had been communicated to the industry in advance of its release to the world via that now infamous interview. Insurers were, we learned, told that the review was coming. But no details were provided. What’s more, they had been sworn to secrecy (so unfair!).
The dagger was wielded by means of the story he told about the way the review had been communicated to the industry in advance of its release to the world via that now infamous interview given by the hapless Clive Adamson, the FCA’s director of supervision who in an earlier life approved the appointment of Paul Flowers to chair the Co-operative Bank. As we now know, the FCA had to issue a clarification in the wake of the impression being given that 30 million policies might have to be individually reviewed. But this took the watchdog six hours and potentially created a false market in insurers’ shares while it dithered.
Insurers were, we learned, told that the review was coming. But no details were provided on the shape or scope of it so there was nothing for them to compare against Mr Adamson’s words in print. What’s more, they had been sworn to secrecy (so unfair!) The testimony came on the day a senior lawyer was appointed to look into what went wrong. Mr Thoresen could have provided him with his starter for 10, which was perhaps the intention from the outset.
As we now know, the FCA had to issue a clarification in the wake of the impression being given that 30m politics might have to be individually reviewed (at huge potential cost). But this took the watchdog six hours and potentially created a false market in insurers’ shares.  His clever and perhaps ever so slightly cynical performance arguably cemented the effort the industry has been making to undermine the credibility of the regulator. So Mr Thoresen has done his job well and it’s doubtful the ABI will hear many complaints when it comes to discussing his bonus.
The testimony came on the day a senior lawyer was appointed to look into what went wrong at the regulator - and the terms of reference appear to be commendably broad. Mr Thoresen could have provided him with his starter for ten, which was perhaps the intention from the outset.  Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, is in favour of the review and is clear that the foul-up over its announcement should not divert attention from its content, particularly if it discovers failings by insurers.
Mr Thoresen’s clever, and perhaps ever so slightly cynical performance, cemented the effort the industry has been making to undermine the credibility of the regulator. So Mr Thoresen has done his job well and its doubtful the ABI will hear many complaints when it comes around to discussing his bonus. 
Mr Tyrie is also in favour of the review and is clear that the foul up over its announcement should not divert attention from life insurers’ own failings. He’s right about that. But this is a very real danger now.