This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/pc-keith-blakelock-nicky-jacobs-cleared-of-murdering-officer-in-1985-tottenham-riots-9248916.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
PC Keith Blakelock trial: Seventh man cleared of murdering officer in 1985 Tottenham riots PC Keith Blakelock trial: Questions raised after Nicky Jacobs is cleared of murder
(about 4 hours later)
The wounds from one of the most damaging and painful episodes in modern British policing were reopened today after the seventh man accused of being part of the mob that hacked PC Keith Blakelock to death during the Tottenham riots 29 years ago was cleared of his murder. The Crown Prosecution Service has defended its decision to put a convicted rioter on trial for the killing of PC Keith Blakelock after the dead man’s family watched as a seventh man was cleared of one of the country’s most notorious unsolved murders.
Nicky Jacobs, a 16-year-old teenager at the time of the attack, wept in the dock after he was found not guilty of being part of a 20-strong group who had stabbed the officer more than 40 times and tried to decapitate him during riots on the Broadwater Farm Estate in 1985. Nicky Jacobs, 45, punched the air and wept after he was found not guilty by a jury at the Old Bailey following a controversial trial based in part on the evidence of men involved in the 1985 attack who had been granted immunity from prosecution. It means that after the third inquiry into the killing at the Broadwater Farm Estate, there is still no justice for the family of the dead officer. They said they were “extremely sad and disappointed” at the verdict.
PC Blakelock’s widow, Elizabeth Johnson, slumped back into her chair at the verdicts and was comforted by members of her family outside the court. The trial followed the third police investigation into the killing and relied in large part on evidence by two men who took part in the attack but were given immunity from prosecution since they kicked rather than stabbed the 40-year-old policeman. Three people were jailed in 1987 for the murder but were later cleared after new scientific evidence revealed that crucial interview notes had been tampered with. Two of the men, Winston Silcott and Mark Braithwaite, were among the defendant’s supporters in the public gallery.
A third witness came forward 24 years after the attack to say he had also seen Mr Jacobs attack the officer from his home on the estate. But the witness, known only as Q, a long-term heroin and alcohol user, was accused by Mr Jacobs’ legal team of suffering from delusions because of his substance abuse. The officer’s widow, Elizabeth Johnson, sank back in her seat and appeared visibly shocked as a jury took  six hours to return not guilty verdicts. The trial was the culmination of a multi-million pound investigation that followed her personal plea for justice.
There were cheers from the public gallery after the jury took less than seven hours to return not guilty verdicts for both murder and manslaughter. Mr Jacobs’ supporters included Winston Silcott, who was jailed in the 1980s for the murder but was later cleared after scientific tests showed that interview notes had been tampered with by the original investigation team. Mr Jacobs is now the seventh man to have been charged, prosecuted and cleared of involvement in the attack. Police said that they knew the identity of about 20 people involved in the attack and appealed to other witnesses to come forward, saying that the case would not be closed.
Scotland Yard Assistant Commissioner Mark Rowley said: “"Sadly, Keith's widow, family and friends still have not seen anyone brought to justice for his murder. The dignity, extraordinary patience and courage they have shown in their nearly 30-year quest for justice is humbling. “We are obviously extremely sad and disappointed at the verdict,” said the family in a statement. ”We viewed this trial as an opportunity to see some form of justice served for Keith. There were many people involved in a murder on that night of 6 October 1985 and it is regretful that no-one has yet to be found guilty despite the number of people with knowledge of the events of that night.”
"We will not give up on bringing Keith's killers to justice. There are people who know exactly who took part in the attack on Keith and people who took part themselves. It is not too late for you to come forward. Almost 30 years on people's lives are very different, their allegiances broken or shifted.” Jacobs, who is expected to be released from Belmarsh Prison tomorrow, received one of the longest jail sentences for affray in the immediate aftermath of the riot. But he was not charged with murder until last year, in part on the strength of three witness accounts. The prosecution also claimed that a rap poem about the killing found in his cell and comments made to a police officer 12 years later represented two apparent confessions.
The three main witnesses, who were given pseudonyms, admitted changing their accounts over the years following the murder. One, John Brown, said he saw Jacobs use a machete in the attack, but in cross examination, he admitted he thought all black people looked alike. However, his legal team said that the evidence against him was based on a witness’s delusional fantasy, mistaken identity, and the prospect of payment for assisting police. Two of the witnesses were paid £5,000 in 1994 for their assistance, the court heard, but have not been paid in the latest inquiry. 
Jenny Hopkins, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor for CPS London, said the decision to charge Jacobs followed a review of three police inquiries over 20 years. “Following this review we concluded that there was sufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction and it was in the public interest to charge Nicholas Jacobs with the murder of PC Keith Blakelock.
“This evidence included three witnesses who the prosecution say gave their accounts independently of each other with no suggestion of collusion. It was right that all the evidence in this case was put before a jury and we respect its decision.”
Silcott, who was found guilty at the Old Bailey of murdering PC Blakelock in 1987 before his conviction was quashed in 1991, said the police had brought the case because they were “bitter about what happened” following his acquittal.
“My conclusion is that they had promised the Blakelock family that they would get justice for him and so they were trying to get anyone they could,” he told reporters outside the court.