This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/comment/ben-chu-our-mutual-friends-9249768.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ben Chu: Our mutual friends OUTLOOK: Co-operation deficit at the Co op
(about 9 hours later)
Outlook There seems to be a co-operation deficit at the Co-op. On the one side are those who would like to see the group become more like a public company in its governance structure. Others are arguing this will undermine the essence of the mutual and wish to retain a powerful voice for members.Outlook There seems to be a co-operation deficit at the Co-op. On the one side are those who would like to see the group become more like a public company in its governance structure. Others are arguing this will undermine the essence of the mutual and wish to retain a powerful voice for members.
There's no doubt that mutuals can be mismanaged. The Co-op itself has shown that expertly that in recent years. But it doesn't follow that the solution is to import a traditional plc structure. We shouldn't forget that public companies can also be hideously mismanaged. Of course people like the amateur former Co-op bank chair Paul Flowers can ruin businesses. But so can professional managers like Fred Goodwin at the Royal Bank of Scotland. Plc good, mutual bad, is not a compelling argument.There's no doubt that mutuals can be mismanaged. The Co-op itself has shown that expertly that in recent years. But it doesn't follow that the solution is to import a traditional plc structure. We shouldn't forget that public companies can also be hideously mismanaged. Of course people like the amateur former Co-op bank chair Paul Flowers can ruin businesses. But so can professional managers like Fred Goodwin at the Royal Bank of Scotland. Plc good, mutual bad, is not a compelling argument.