This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/11/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane.html

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Possible Signal Detected in Search for Malaysia Air Jet Possible Signal Detected in Search for Missing Jet
(about 3 hours later)
SYDNEY, Australia — A sensor dropped into the sea by a Royal Australian Air Force plane detected a possible acoustic signal in the same area of ocean where a search ship had earlier detected signals that may come from flight recorders of the missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft, the Australian authorities overseeing the search said Thursday. SYDNEY, Australia — A sensor dropped into the sea by a Royal Australian Air Force plane detected a possible acoustic signal in the same area of the Indian Ocean where a search ship had earlier detected signals that might have come from flight recorders of the missing Malaysia Airlines aircraft, the Australian authorities overseeing the search said Thursday.
The announcement of the latest potential clue as to the whereabouts of the vanished aircraft contained few details, and could turn out to be another of the many false leads that have dogged the hunt for Flight 370 for more than a month. But it came in the same seas off Western Australia where the Ocean Shield, an Australian defense force ship, already collected four sets of signals — two on Saturday, two on Tuesday — that could have come from beacons attached to the missing plane’s two flight recorders. The announcement of the latest potential clue to the whereabouts of the aircraft contained few details, and the signal could turn out to be another of the many false leads that have dogged the hunt for Flight 370 for more than a month. But it came in the same seas off Western Australia where the Ocean Shield, an Australian defense force ship, had already collected four sets of signals — two on Saturday, two on Tuesday — that could have come from beacons attached to the plane’s two flight recorders.
Angus Houston, the retired air chief marshal overseeing the search in the southern Indian Ocean off Western Australia, “has confirmed that whilst conducting an acoustic search this afternoon a RAAF AP-3C Orion aircraft has detected a possible signal in the vicinity of the Australian Defense Vessel Ocean Shield,” the Australian body overseeing the search said an emailed statement. Angus Houston, the retired air chief marshal overseeing the search in the southern Indian Ocean, confirmed that a AP-3C Orion plane had detected the signal, the Australian body overseeing the search said in an emailed statement on Thursday.
“The acoustic data will require further analysis overnight but shows potential of being from a man-made source,” Mr. Houston said. “I will provide a further update if, and when, further information becomes available.” “The acoustic data will require further analysis overnight but shows potential of being from a man-made source,” Mr. Houston said in the statement. “I will provide a further update if, and when, further information becomes available.”
In an email, the Joint Agency Coordination Center, which is overseeing the search, said the signal was detected by a sonar buoy, or sonobuoy, dropped from the Orion aircraft. The center did not give the precise location of the buoy when it caught the signal or the duration of the signal. The Joint Agency Coordination Center, which is overseeing the search, said the signal had been detected by a sonar buoy, or sonobuoy, dropped from the Orion; the buoy’s radio transmits data back to the plane. The center did not give the precise location of the buoy when it caught the signal or the duration of the signal.
At a news conference on Wednesday, Mr. Houston explained: “Sonobuoys are essentially a sensor package that’s parachuted out of the aircraft, floats on the surface of the ocean and will deploy a hydrophone 1,000 feet below the surface of the ocean.” Such data could be used to narrow the focus in the search for wreckage and the flight recorders that may be crucial to determining what caused the plane, a Boeing 777-200, to disappear on March 8 with 239 people on board en route from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing. The batteries on the flight recorders’ signal beacons have been consuming power for more than 30 days — their standard operating life — and each extra day of signals could prove important to homing on in the recorders.
Such data could be used to narrow down the search for wreckage and the flight recorders that are crucial to determining what caused the plane to disappear on March 8 with 239 people on board. On Wednesday, Mr. Houston said he was increasingly hopeful that wreckage and the “black box” flight recorders would eventually be found, despite the daunting size and depth of the water into which the plane is thought to have plunged.
On Wednesday, Mr. Houston told reporters that he was increasingly optimistic that wreckage and the “black box” flight recorders from the missing Boeing 777-200 aircraft would eventually be found, despite the daunting size and depth of the ocean where the plane is thought to have plunged into the water after a baffling departure from its planned route from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to Beijing. Mr. Houston said analysis had confirmed that the underwater pings detected over the weekend had most likely came from the flight data recorder, ruling out marine mammals or other vessels as the source. “I’m now optimistic we will find the aircraft, or what is left of the aircraft,” Mr. Houston said at a news conference in Perth, Australia, on Wednesday. But he also noted that searchers had still not found debris linked to Flight 370, and that once the batteries on the locators expire, the acoustic signals will fade.
Mr. Houston said that analysis had confirmed that the underwater pings detected over the weekend most likely came from the plane’s flight data recorder. A spokeswoman for the coordination center said 10 military aircraft, four civilian jets and 13 ships were involved in the search on Thursday, in an area reduced to just under 60,000 square kilometers, or roughly 23,000 square miles.
“I’m now optimistic we will find the aircraft, or what is left of the aircraft,” Mr. Houston told a news conference in the western city of Perth on Wednesday. But he also warned that searchers had still not found debris linked to Flight 370, and the battery life of the black box locaters, which could be almost three miles down, could expire, causing the acoustic signals to fade. The batteries are already days past their official shelf life. The plane has been missing for more than a month. The area where Ocean Shield is now trawling for acoustic pings is about 1,000 miles northwest of Perth, and several hundred miles east of the main search area, where investigators believe that any plane debris is likely to have drifted.
On Tuesday, a United States Navy locator towed by the Ocean Shield detected two distinct signals, one lasting 5 minutes and 32 seconds, and the second lasting about seven minutes in an area over 1,000 miles northwest of Perth. A map released by the Australian search authorities indicated the Ocean Shield detected the four sets of signals when it was at points a maximum distance of about 15 miles from each other. The salvage and rescue coordinator, Capt. Mark M. Matthews of the United States Navy, said in a telephone interview that Australian Navy clearance divers had been collecting small pieces of floating debris.
Despite the strong clues, Mr. Houston said that until wreckage was discovered he would not confirm that the aircraft had been found. He also warned that silt on the ocean bed could muffle or distort noise and would hamper a visual search. Captain Matthews, who is in charge of the United States Navy-operated pinger locator being towed by the Ocean Shield, described the latest reception of acoustic signals from the ship as enormously encouraging. “To get a detection builds your confidence,” he said, especially when the last known physical location of the aircraft was thousands of miles away.
The coordination center spokeswoman said 10 military aircraft, four civilian jets and 13 ships had been involved in the search on Thursday, in an area reduced to just under 60,000 square kilometers, or roughly 23,000 square miles. The Ocean Shield pinger detected two distinct signals on Tuesday, one lasting 5 minutes and 32 seconds, and the other lasting about seven minutes. A map released by the Australian search authorities indicated that the Ocean Shield detected the four sets of signals at a maximum distance of about 15 miles from one another.
David Griffin, an oceanographer advising the Australian government on the search, is trying to track debris based on water and wind currents. He said several factors, including a false start in the wrong area, had seriously set the searchers back.
“The delay was the biggest obstacle,” said Dr. Griffin, a scientist at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Australia’s national science agency. “The first 10 days everyone was looking up in Malaysia.”
The search zone is now significantly north of where searchers have theorized that the plane hit the water. Some debris might have sunk to the ocean floor, experts like Dr. Griffin say, while smaller pieces may have been pushed great distances by wind. Big waves could have broken up or sunken parts of any plane wreckage, he said, and climate and water conditions are very changeable in the surrounding area.
“Tropical Cyclone Gillian passed over the area around March 25, and gave the ocean a massive kick,” Dr. Griffin said. “The cyclone came right over the top of where we think the debris field was. That projects a lot more uncertainty into where the windblown debris might have gone.”