This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/apr/11/cowboys-on-the-timor-sea-one-rule-for-our-navy-another-for-indonesian-fishermen

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
One rule for our Navy, another for Indonesian fishermen One rule for our navy, another for Indonesian fishermen
(35 minutes later)
Last year, during a visit toLast year, during a visit to
Kupang, in West Timor, I met a fisherman with a 12 year old daughter and aKupang, in West Timor, I met a fisherman with a 12 year old daughter and a
seven year old son. His two boats were burned by the Australian government asseven year old son. His two boats were burned by the Australian government as
they were said at the time to have breached Australian waters. He wasthey were said at the time to have breached Australian waters. He was
unsuccessfully trying to gain work as crew on another boat. His children nounsuccessfully trying to gain work as crew on another boat. His children no
longer attended school, as the family simply could not afford it. His daughter,longer attended school, as the family simply could not afford it. His daughter,
once the top of her class, struggled to teach herself and her younger brotheronce the top of her class, struggled to teach herself and her younger brother
at home.at home.
The treatment inflicted on this Indonesian family highlights theThe treatment inflicted on this Indonesian family highlights the
hypocrisy currently on display by the Australian Navy, which was recently made hypocrisy currently on display by the Australian navy, which was recently made
evident by the Senate inquiry report into breaches of Indonesian waters in the Timor Sea. It appears that there's one rule for our Navy, and quite evident by the Senate inquiry report into breaches of Indonesian waters in the Timor Sea. It appears that there's one rule for our navy, and quite
another for impoverished fishermen.another for impoverished fishermen.
In February, the defence and customs review reported on the six recent incursions undertaken by the AustralianIn February, the defence and customs review reported on the six recent incursions undertaken by the Australian
Navy in Indonesian waters, asserting that "on each occasion the incursion navy in Indonesian waters, asserting that "on each occasion the incursion
was inadvertent … each arose from incorrect calculation of the boundaries ofwas inadvertent … each arose from incorrect calculation of the boundaries of
Indonesian waters rather than as a deliberate action or navigationalIndonesian waters rather than as a deliberate action or navigational
error." Four of these incursions were committed by the Royal Australianerror." Four of these incursions were committed by the Royal Australian
Navy, and two by Customs and Border Protection. The joint review found that a navy, and two by Customs and Border Protection. The joint review found that a
lack of training in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) may have contributed to the breaches.lack of training in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) may have contributed to the breaches.
While the navy’s actionsWhile the navy’s actions
received no punishment, this stronglyreceived no punishment, this strongly
contrasts with the Australiancontrasts with the Australian
government’s aggressive crackdown on the boats of our Indonesian neighbours andgovernment’s aggressive crackdown on the boats of our Indonesian neighbours and
its ongoing effects on their families, who suffer punitive circumstances.its ongoing effects on their families, who suffer punitive circumstances.
Of course, few IndonesianOf course, few Indonesian
fishermen receive training on the UNCLOS, with many not being able to attendfishermen receive training on the UNCLOS, with many not being able to attend
schooling past a primary school level. Yet since 1988, an unknown number ofschooling past a primary school level. Yet since 1988, an unknown number of
boats who venture near or into the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone have beenboats who venture near or into the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone have been
apprehended and burned. Fishermen are thrown into immigration detention,apprehended and burned. Fishermen are thrown into immigration detention,
sometimes suffering lengthy delays until trial, where they are then representedsometimes suffering lengthy delays until trial, where they are then represented
by Legal Aid against the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions, orby Legal Aid against the Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions, or
released without charge.released without charge.
After legal proceedings, even when the fishermen were found toAfter legal proceedings, even when the fishermen were found to
be innocent under Australian law, fishermen have said that people are sometimesbe innocent under Australian law, fishermen have said that people are sometimes
deported back to Denpasar in Bali, where they are left to scrounge their waydeported back to Denpasar in Bali, where they are left to scrounge their way
back to their home villages, sometimes more than 1,000 kilometres away on farback to their home villages, sometimes more than 1,000 kilometres away on far
flung islands.flung islands.
Boats are occasionally owned outright, but more often are subject to loans, orBoats are occasionally owned outright, but more often are subject to loans, or
are the direct asset of another person in the village. The boats’ destructionare the direct asset of another person in the village. The boats’ destruction
becomes an economic millstone hung about individuals’ necks; a debt that theybecomes an economic millstone hung about individuals’ necks; a debt that they
cannot repay.cannot repay.
Others have paid the ultimate price. In 2003, 21 year old fisherman Mansur La Ibu died in detention, onboard his own boat strung up to wharves in Darwin harbour.Others have paid the ultimate price. In 2003, 21 year old fisherman Mansur La Ibu died in detention, onboard his own boat strung up to wharves in Darwin harbour.
He had been held without trial for one month. Two years later, 37 year oldHe had been held without trial for one month. Two years later, 37 year old
Mohammed Heri suffered a similar fate.Mohammed Heri suffered a similar fate.
Until 2005, detained fishermen were treated by the Australian governmentUntil 2005, detained fishermen were treated by the Australian government
as being too primitive to require detention on land, with access to bathrooms,as being too primitive to require detention on land, with access to bathrooms,
steady ground, shelter and away from lingering tropical mosquitoes. Instead,steady ground, shelter and away from lingering tropical mosquitoes. Instead,
politicians commented that they would "be more comfortable" on board their boats.politicians commented that they would "be more comfortable" on board their boats.
While one skipper sat in Australian detention, unscrupulousWhile one skipper sat in Australian detention, unscrupulous
Indonesian debt collectors visited and burned his home, seriously injuring hisIndonesian debt collectors visited and burned his home, seriously injuring his
wife and infant child. That fisherman was sent home onwife and infant child. That fisherman was sent home on
"compassionate" grounds without charge. We can only imagine the"compassionate" grounds without charge. We can only imagine the
repercussions and personal hardship that flow from the detention of hardworkingrepercussions and personal hardship that flow from the detention of hardworking
fishermen in Australia, while their families struggle in ever-present poverty withoutfishermen in Australia, while their families struggle in ever-present poverty without
their breadwinners.their breadwinners.
In 2008, a man from West Timor was acquitted of all unlawful fishing charges by the high court ofIn 2008, a man from West Timor was acquitted of all unlawful fishing charges by the high court of
Australia as his boat had been apprehended outside the Australian Fishing Zone.Australia as his boat had been apprehended outside the Australian Fishing Zone.
The decision came after almost two years of imprisonment. In his absence, hisThe decision came after almost two years of imprisonment. In his absence, his
family would have struggled to make ends meet in one of the poorest provincesfamily would have struggled to make ends meet in one of the poorest provinces
in Indonesia. In the same year as his acquittal, 1,217 fishermen werein Indonesia. In the same year as his acquittal, 1,217 fishermen were
apprehended and detained.apprehended and detained.
One of these fishermen, Sahring from West Timor, had his boatOne of these fishermen, Sahring from West Timor, had his boat
burned by the Australian navy in 2008, albeit in Indonesian waters. In March 2014, a landmark case handed down by the federal court of Australia in Darwin acknowledgedburned by the Australian navy in 2008, albeit in Indonesian waters. In March 2014, a landmark case handed down by the federal court of Australia in Darwin acknowledged
that he was entitled to $44,000 in compensation.that he was entitled to $44,000 in compensation.
It must be asked: how many ofIt must be asked: how many of
the other 1,216 fishermen also had their property destroyed in their ownthe other 1,216 fishermen also had their property destroyed in their own
waters?waters?
Since 2005, approximately 5,394Since 2005, approximately 5,394
fishermen have been apprehended by Australian officials on the ocean, andfishermen have been apprehended by Australian officials on the ocean, and
hundreds of boats destroyed. Such antiquated policy in the treatment of ourhundreds of boats destroyed. Such antiquated policy in the treatment of our
neighbours stands in disproportionate contrast to the "unintended"neighbours stands in disproportionate contrast to the "unintended"
incursions of naval ships, armed to the teeth with every piece of radar andincursions of naval ships, armed to the teeth with every piece of radar and
satellite equipment under the sun, who have suffered no cost or damage as asatellite equipment under the sun, who have suffered no cost or damage as a
result of their action.result of their action.
Ironically, these naval boatsIronically, these naval boats
have also often destroyed the very fishing boats that have inadvertentlyhave also often destroyed the very fishing boats that have inadvertently
crossed into Australian waters. Warships suffer no penalty and the boatscrossed into Australian waters. Warships suffer no penalty and the boats
supporting thousands of families living in poverty become ash on the water.supporting thousands of families living in poverty become ash on the water.
Imagine the outrage in Australia if Indonesian warships were to apprehendImagine the outrage in Australia if Indonesian warships were to apprehend
Australian boats, even with a legal basis.Australian boats, even with a legal basis.
We should all be concerned, as if Australian officials are notWe should all be concerned, as if Australian officials are not
aware of their basic obligations under international law, what stops them fromaware of their basic obligations under international law, what stops them from
being cowboys on the sea?being cowboys on the sea?