This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-26984472

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 5 Version 6
Oscar Pistorius on defensive over alarm Oscar Pistorius: I didn't hear Reeva scream
(about 1 hour later)
Prosecutors have pressed South African sprinter Oscar Pistorius to clarify his claim that his home alarm was switched off the night he shot his girlfriend. Oscar Pistorius has told his murder trial that girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp did not scream or shout as he grabbed a gun and fired shots that killed her.
Mr Pistorius initially said his alarm "must have been switched off", but in court was more certain, saying: "I turned the alarm off." Prosecutor Gerrie Nel said it was "improbable" that she would stand in the bathroom saying nothing while Mr Pistorius was just 3m (10ft) away shouting at her to call the police.
Prosecutor Gerrie Nel accused him of lying, but the Olympic athlete blamed tiredness for the discrepancies. Mr Pistorius said he could not explain but reiterated that no woman screamed.
Mr Pistorius, 27, admits killing Reeva Steenkamp but says it was an accident. Mr Pistorius, 27, denies murder saying the killing was a terrible accident.
The sprinter has insisted in court in Pretoria that he shot Ms Steenkamp on 14 February last year after mistaking her for an intruder. He admits killing Ms Steenkamp but says he fired his gun after mistaking her for an intruder.
During the first set of questions on Friday, Mr Nel repeatedly pressed Mr Pistorius as to why his testimony in court did not match his earlier statement, asking him: "Are you too tired to continue?" He believed she had been in bed when he grabbed his gun, made his way to the bathroom and fired shots through the door.
"I don't need time. I'm tired. That's not going to change," Mr Pistorius replied. The prosecution says he killed her after an argument.
Mr Nel then said: "I think you're trying to cover up for lies. I'm not convinced by your answers." On the third day of his cross-examination, Mr Nel pressed the Olympic sprinter to explain the final moments leading up to the shooting.
The judge intervened and asked Mr Pistorius to clarify that he was not too tired to carry on. He asked why he had not checked whether Ms Steenkamp had heard his calls for her to phone the police, or why he had not taken her to safety instead of going to confront the supposed intruder.
The prosecutor moved on to a discussion of events in the athlete's past, before returning to Mr Pistorius' account of the night Ms Steenkamp was killed. Mr Pistorius said it was his personality to confront what he believed was an intruder.
The trial has been adjourned until Monday morning.
'She was scared of you'
Later, Mr Nel questioned Mr Pistorius's account that he had not heard Ms Steenkamp shout or scream during the whole incident.
He said it was the "most improbable" part of the account.
"At that stage when you shouted at Reeva to phone the police, she was 3m away from you in the toilet, but she didn't say anything," he said.
"Why would she not say anything?"
Mr Pistorius said he did not know.
The prosecutor accused him of lying, and said he had shot Ms Steenkamp while she was talking to him from the bathroom.
"She wasn't scared of an intruder," he said. "She was scared of you."
He went on: "Are you sure that Reeva did not scream after the first shot?"
Mr Pistorius took a long time to answer, and broke down into sobs.
"At no point did Reeva shout out or scream," he said.
Mr Nel then disputed his claim, saying he would not have been able to hear if he had just fired his gun.
Prosecution witnesses have testified to hearing a woman scream, but the defence disputes their testimony.
'Fixated' on intruder'Fixated' on intruder
Mr Nel repeated a line of attack he had used on Thursday, testing Mr Pistorius' version of events, and accusing him of lying. Mr Nel repeated a line of attack he had used on Thursday, testing the defendant's version of events, and accusing him of lying.
Mr Pistorius told the court he had heard a window opening and closing, and had immediately got out of bed and grabbed his gun.Mr Pistorius told the court he had heard a window opening and closing, and had immediately got out of bed and grabbed his gun.
"I told Reeva to get down and phone the police," he said."I told Reeva to get down and phone the police," he said.
Mr Nel asked if he had not looked at Ms Steenkamp, or asked if she had heard the noise.Mr Nel asked if he had not looked at Ms Steenkamp, or asked if she had heard the noise.
"On the morning of the 14th I was sure of what I heard," he said."On the morning of the 14th I was sure of what I heard," he said.
"My whole being was fixated on this person that I thought was in the bathroom.""My whole being was fixated on this person that I thought was in the bathroom."
Mr Nel went on to show the court photographs from the bedroom that he said contradicted Mr Pistorius' account of where various items were.
In a similar line of questioning on Thursday, Mr Nel had raised items including electric cooling fans and a duvet. On Friday, the prosecutor focused on a pair of jeans that were on top of a duvet.
The prosecution says Mr Pistorius shot his girlfriend after they had an argument in the bedroom.
The double amputee faces life imprisonment if convicted of murdering the 29-year-old model.The double amputee faces life imprisonment if convicted of murdering the 29-year-old model.
If he is acquitted of murder, the court must consider an alternative charge of culpable homicide, for which he could receive up to 15 years in prison.If he is acquitted of murder, the court must consider an alternative charge of culpable homicide, for which he could receive up to 15 years in prison.
Mr Pistorius also faces charges of illegally firing a gun in public and of illegally possessing ammunition, both of which he denies.Mr Pistorius also faces charges of illegally firing a gun in public and of illegally possessing ammunition, both of which he denies.
There are no juries at trials in South Africa, and his fate will ultimately be decided by the judge, assisted by two assessors.There are no juries at trials in South Africa, and his fate will ultimately be decided by the judge, assisted by two assessors.