This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7082652.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Police 'torment' Forest Gate man New Forest Gate compensation bid
(about 2 hours later)
One of the men shot during a terror raid in Forest Gate has told MPs he has been "tormented" by armed police. Police say they have received a compensation claim from the brothers arrested in a botched terror raid in Forest Gate over a second incident.
Mohammed Abdulkahar said he "feared for his life" after recently being stopped by armed officers near his home who, he says, threatened to shoot him. The pair claim armed police threatened to shoot them after they were stopped near their home in August this year.
Mr Abdulkahar was shot in the shoulder at his east London home in June 2006. He and his brother Abul Koyair were later released without charge. One of the men, Mohammed Abdulkahar, told MPs he now "feared for his life".
The two men were giving evidence to the Commons Home Affairs select committee. Mr Abdulkahar was shot in the shoulder in June 2006 during a police raid on their east London home. The brothers were later released without charge.
Mr Abdulkahar said he was on his moped at the time of the recent incident. The police said the shooting was an accident and they regretted it. The brothers' claim for compensation from that incident is still outstanding.
Mr Abdulkahar told MPs of the latest incident when he gave evidence to the home affairs select committee on Wednesday.
"About seven armed officers pulled us over at the top of our road, we were manhandled to the floor, we were handcuffed without getting arrested. I have no trust in them. I have no faith in them."About seven armed officers pulled us over at the top of our road, we were manhandled to the floor, we were handcuffed without getting arrested. I have no trust in them. I have no faith in them.
If I wasn't strong, I could have turned against this country Mohammed AbdulkaharIf I wasn't strong, I could have turned against this country Mohammed Abdulkahar
"[Metropolitan Police Commissioner] Sir Ian Blair has to recognise he is putting my life at risk."[Metropolitan Police Commissioner] Sir Ian Blair has to recognise he is putting my life at risk.
"Every time I walk the street I fear for my life. I don't fear from the criminals, I fear from the police.""Every time I walk the street I fear for my life. I don't fear from the criminals, I fear from the police."
'Shoot him''Shoot him'
Asked if he thought he had been deliberately targeted by police, Mr Abdulkahar said: "The armed officers clearly knew who I was and who my brother was.Asked if he thought he had been deliberately targeted by police, Mr Abdulkahar said: "The armed officers clearly knew who I was and who my brother was.
"They were even making jokes, saying 'how much money did you get in compensation? How many millions did you get of our overtime money?'""They were even making jokes, saying 'how much money did you get in compensation? How many millions did you get of our overtime money?'"
He said he had "independent witnesses that witnessed the officers shouting, saying 'shoot him, shoot him'".He said he had "independent witnesses that witnessed the officers shouting, saying 'shoot him, shoot him'".
He said he had not made an official complaint because he "had no faith in the system".He said he had not made an official complaint because he "had no faith in the system".
Mr Abdulkahar acknowledged the police had a "difficult job" and that there was a terrorist threat in the UK, but he said: "You cannot go on putting innocent people's lives at risk and their families." Compensation claim
The Metropolitan Police confirmed the brothers were stopped and searched by armed officers on 24 August after police were informed of a pizza delivery man in possible possession of a firearm.
They were released without charge. Another man, aged 37, was detained with two imitation weapons but later released without charge.
The brothers' allegations as to what was said by the officers has not been investigated as they have not made an official complaint.
A spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said it had received a claim for compensation from the brothers over the incident "but no court proceedings have been issued against the Metropolitan Police Authority at this time".
A letter of claim is the first step towards suing the police for damages. The police have three months to investigate the claim before deciding to admit liability and settle or contest in court.
In his evidence to MPs, Mr Abdulkahar acknowledged the police had a "difficult job" and that there was a terrorist threat in the UK, but he said: "You cannot go on putting innocent people's lives at risk and their families."
'Risk''Risk'
During the evidence session he also told MPs he initially thought he was the victim of an armed robbery when officers burst into his home in June 2006 and shot him. He also told the committee he initially thought he was the victim of an armed robbery when officers burst into his home in June 2006 and shot him.
He said his experiences had led him to conclude that "every Muslim is at risk" from the police.He said his experiences had led him to conclude that "every Muslim is at risk" from the police.
But he said he was "happy in a way that it happened to me, if it happened to anyone" as it could have led a weaker person to become radicalised.But he said he was "happy in a way that it happened to me, if it happened to anyone" as it could have led a weaker person to become radicalised.
"If I wasn't strong, I could have turned against this country," Mr Abdulkahar told MPs."If I wasn't strong, I could have turned against this country," Mr Abdulkahar told MPs.
He said he would be willing to meet Sir Ian Blair to discuss how to combat extremism but only if he received a personal apology from the Metropolitan Police chief.He said he would be willing to meet Sir Ian Blair to discuss how to combat extremism but only if he received a personal apology from the Metropolitan Police chief.
'Accidental discharge' Police were hunting for a suspected chemical device when they raided the Forest Gate house in 2006.
Police were hunting for a suspected chemical device when they raided the Forest Gate house.
Nothing was found and Scotland Yard later said it regretted the incident and that an "accidental discharge" caused injury in the raid.Nothing was found and Scotland Yard later said it regretted the incident and that an "accidental discharge" caused injury in the raid.
The Independent Police Complaints Commission said in a report it was "satisfied there is no evidence of intent or recklessness on the part of the firearms officer and that no offence was committed in the firing of the weapon". The Independent Police Complaints Commission said in a report on the 2006 raid it was "satisfied there is no evidence of intent or recklessness on the part of the firearms officer and that no offence was committed in the firing of the weapon".
It concluded the gun, which had its safety catch off as the officer entered the house, had been fired by accident.It concluded the gun, which had its safety catch off as the officer entered the house, had been fired by accident.