This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2014/apr/29/game-of-thrones-racism-sexism-rape

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Game of Thrones: too much racism and sexism – so I stopped watching Game of Thrones: too much racism and sexism – so I stopped watching
(4 months later)
Last Last summer, in the finale of Game of Thrones' third season, mother of dragons Daenerys Targaryen stood outside the walls of Yunkai waiting for the slaves she just freed, hoping to convince them to join her army as free men. Daenerys, the white-blonde queen traded moons ago to the Dothraki by her brother, moves into the crowd of outstretched brown arms as they chant “mhysa”, which, we learn, means “mother” in their native tongue, and is carried into the crowd as the camera pulls back to show her floating in the middle of this sea of arms like the bright planet in a constellation of darkness.
summer, in the finale of Game I turned to my husband and said: “No one at HBO remembers the visual impact of slavery, I guess?” It was at that moment I decided to stop watching it. I’m aware that Game of Thrones is a TV show, a work of fiction, but having invested in it for three seasons, I no longer trusted the creators to bridge the gap of thoughtful conversation between action and intent. How much misogyny and racism are we expected to put up with in the name of entertainment? And what does it mean when those systems of oppression are crafted not solely by the author, but by television executives looking to create a heightened sense of drama?
of Thrones' third season, It’s strange to quit a show after putting so much time into it. I also decided to skip this final season of Mad Men, having long ago lost interest in the weekly display of misogyny and ill will that main character Don Draper visits upon everyone around him. Sure, he’s a man of his time, but that doesn’t mean I have to engage in the weekly assault on my eyeballs as he denigrates his wives and stomps around as a titan of industry, a master of the universe.
mother of dragons Daenerys Targaryen stood outside the walls of I’m exhausted by the triumph of men at the expense of women as a narrative device. It’s not only boring, but also a little too tied to my real-world experience as a woman and person of color for me to look at these shows objectively and give them a pass – not when the television industry is so criminally underdeveloped in hiring or telling the stories of minority populations. I certainly don’t expect that every good story will omit difficult subject matter or be perfectly balanced and fair, but I do need to trust that the direction of a TV show isn’t rooted in a violence or misogyny that seems excessive.
Yunkai waiting for the slaves she just freed, hoping to convince them The misogyny of Game of Thrones has always seemed so gratuitous as to pull me out of the story. For every woman with authority, there are five more being disparaged, and most women come to their power through physical and emotional humiliation (Daenerys) or a cool detachment from reality (Cersei). Fans are quick to defend the sexism of the books, but the artistic direction of the TV show has cleaved itself from the artistic intent of the books lately in a way that has everyone asking: “What’s really going on?”
to join her army as free men. Daenerys, the white-blonde queen traded moons ago to the Dothraki by her brother, moves into the crowd of In last week’s episode, Breaker of Chains, Jaime very clearly raped Cersei in the tomb of their dead son, and fans of the books immediately noted the difference in tone, saying that this scene was more nuanced in the book, and it was clear that Cersei wanted to have sex after a brief hesitation. The scene created such an uproar that creator George RR Martin released a statement, saying that the dynamic was different in the show, and while it was meant to be disturbing, was not meant to be disturbing for “the wrong reasons.”
outstretched brown arms as they chant “mhysa”, which, we learn, means “mother” in their native tongue, and is carried into But this week, in Oathkeeper, the showrunners went off-script again, in increasingly disturbing ways that once again included gratuitous rape, this time of Craster’s daughters by the mutinous members of the Night’s Watch.
the crowd as the camera pulls back to show her floating in the middle “There’s so much about this episode that is off-book,” says Sarah Jackson, a creative director for a TV company, and the biggest Game of Thrones fan I know. “The first big departure is that it looks at though they’re setting up a Stark reunion between Jon and Bran at the Craster house. I can see how that would work from a TV drama standpoint, but it’s a huge difference. But there’s also the introduction of the White Walker city, population one weird King White Walker, and the fact that they can turn babies into White Walkers. That could have been in the works, but was never in the books.” When I asked her about the rape scene in Oathkeeper, she said it was "particularly horrible. That scene wasn’t even in the book, and was so over the top.”
of this sea of arms like the bright planet in a constellation of Though I had given up, I decided to watch the last two episodes to place the sexual violence in context and form my own opinion about these controversial scenes. In her column last week, Jessica Valenti discussed the qualifiers we attach to rape, and the danger of not calling it rape when we see it, calling out Game of Thrones director Alex Graves for his comment that the sex between Jaime and Cersei was consensual. In this case, his artistic decisions reflect a real world aversion to even noticing rape as violence.
darkness. Having two back-to-back episodes which depict rape creates an environment of distrust, and greatly impacts both the arc of the story and the willingness of some viewers, me included, to remain on board. If we can't trust the showrunners to reflect the spirit of the story any more, then what's left?
I turned to my husband and said: “No one at HBO
remembers the visual impact of slavery, I guess?” It was at that
moment I decided to stop watching it. I’m aware that Game of Thrones is a TV show, a work of fiction, but having invested in it for three seasons, I
no longer trusted the creators to bridge the gap of thoughtful
conversation between action and intent. How much misogyny and racism are we expected to put up with in the name of
entertainment? And what does it mean when those systems of oppression
are crafted not solely by the author, but by television executives
looking to create a heightened sense of drama?
It’s
strange to quit a show after putting so much time into it. I also decided to skip this final season of Mad
Men,
having long ago lost interest in the weekly display of misogyny and
ill will that main character Don Draper visits upon everyone around
him. Sure, he’s a man of his time, but that doesn’t
mean I have to engage in the weekly assault on my eyeballs as he
denigrates his wives and stomps around as a titan of industry, a
master of the universe.
I’m exhausted by the triumph of men at the
expense of women as a narrative device. It’s not only boring, but
also a little too tied to my real-world experience as a woman and
person of color for me to look at these shows objectively and give
them a pass – not when the television industry is so criminally
underdeveloped in hiring or telling the stories of minority
populations.
I certainly don’t expect that every good story will omit difficult
subject matter or be perfectly balanced and fair, but I do need to
trust that the direction of a TV show isn’t rooted in a violence or
misogyny that seems excessive.
The
misogyny of Game
of Thrones
has always seemed so gratuitous as to pull me out of the story.
For every woman with authority, there are five more being disparaged, and
most women come to their power through physical and emotional
humiliation (Daenerys) or a cool detachment from reality (Cersei).
Fans are quick to defend the sexism of the books, but
the artistic direction of the TV show has cleaved itself from the
artistic intent of the books lately in a way that has everyone
asking: “What’s really going on?”
In last week’s episode, Breaker
of Chains, Jaime very clearly raped Cersei in the tomb of their
dead son, and fans of the books immediately noted the difference in
tone, saying that this scene was more nuanced in the book, and it was
clear that Cersei wanted to have sex after a brief hesitation. The
scene created such an uproar that creator George RR Martin released
a statement,
saying that the dynamic was different in the show, and while it was meant to
be disturbing, was not meant to be disturbing for “the wrong
reasons.”
But
this week, in Oathkeeper, the showrunners went off-script
again, in increasingly disturbing ways that once again included
gratuitous rape, this time of Craster’s daughters by the
mutinous members of the Night’s Watch.
“There’s so much about
this episode that is off-book,” says Sarah Jackson, a creative director for a TV company, and the biggest Game
of Thrones
fan I know. “The first big departure is that it looks at though
they’re setting up a Stark reunion between Jon and Bran at the
Craster house. I can see how that would work from a TV drama
standpoint, but it’s a huge difference. But there’s also the
introduction of the White Walker city, population one weird King
White Walker, and the fact that they can turn babies into White
Walkers. That could have been in the works, but was never in the
books.” When I asked her about the rape scene in Oathkeeper, she said it was "particularly horrible. That scene wasn’t even in the
book, and was so
over the top.”
Though I had given up, I decided to watch the last two episodes
to place the sexual violence in context and form my own opinion about
these controversial scenes. In her column last week, Jessica Valenti discussed the qualifiers we attach to rape, and the danger of not calling it rape when we see it, calling out Game of Thrones director Alex Graves for his comment that the sex between Jaime and Cersei was consensual. In this case, his artistic decisions reflect a real world aversion to even noticing rape as violence.
Having
two back-to-back episodes which depict rape creates an environment
of distrust, and greatly impacts both the arc of the story and the
willingness of some viewers, me included, to remain on board. If we can't trust the showrunners to reflect the spirit of the story any more, then what's left?