This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/08/world/asia/court-orders-thai-leader-removed-from-office.html
The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 1 | Version 2 |
|---|---|
| Court Orders Thai Leader Removed From Office | Court Orders Thai Leader Removed From Office |
| (35 minutes later) | |
| BANGKOK — A Thai court on Wednesday ordered Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra removed from office, a highly divisive move and a victory for the powerful antigovernment movement that has sought to overthrow the government in Bangkok for the last six months. | |
| The court ruled that Ms. Yingluck abused her power when she transferred a civil servant more than three years ago. It was not immediately clear who would take Ms. Yingluck’s place. The court also ordered removed all members of Ms. Yingluck’s cabinet who were in office at the time of the transfer. | The court ruled that Ms. Yingluck abused her power when she transferred a civil servant more than three years ago. It was not immediately clear who would take Ms. Yingluck’s place. The court also ordered removed all members of Ms. Yingluck’s cabinet who were in office at the time of the transfer. |
| It was the third time since 2006 that a prime minister representing the political movement founded by Ms. Yingluck’s brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, was removed by court order. The movement, which has its power base in the provinces, has won every election since 2001 but has antagonized the Bangkok establishment, a political struggle that is at the heart of Thailand’s eight years of political crisis. | It was the third time since 2006 that a prime minister representing the political movement founded by Ms. Yingluck’s brother, Thaksin Shinawatra, was removed by court order. The movement, which has its power base in the provinces, has won every election since 2001 but has antagonized the Bangkok establishment, a political struggle that is at the heart of Thailand’s eight years of political crisis. |
| The court’s decision, which highlights its overtly political role, was the coup de grace in a six-month campaign to remove Ms. Yingluck from power. It throws into question elections announced for July 20, which the governing party were likely to win because of their strong support in northern provinces. | The court’s decision, which highlights its overtly political role, was the coup de grace in a six-month campaign to remove Ms. Yingluck from power. It throws into question elections announced for July 20, which the governing party were likely to win because of their strong support in northern provinces. |
| The verdict, which was read on national television, was unanimous among the court’s nine judges and reached with unusual speed. It was delivered just one day after Ms. Yingluck gave evidence at the court. Ms. Yingluck was the country’s first female prime minister but was loathed by the opposition and called a proxy for her brother, Mr. Thaksin, who lives in self-exile after a 2006 military coup and a subsequent conviction for abuse of power in a highly politicized trial. | The verdict, which was read on national television, was unanimous among the court’s nine judges and reached with unusual speed. It was delivered just one day after Ms. Yingluck gave evidence at the court. Ms. Yingluck was the country’s first female prime minister but was loathed by the opposition and called a proxy for her brother, Mr. Thaksin, who lives in self-exile after a 2006 military coup and a subsequent conviction for abuse of power in a highly politicized trial. |
| The antigovernment movement, which is supported by some of the wealthiest families in the country, turned to the courts after unsuccessfully trying to force Ms. Yingluck out by shutting down government offices and occupying major intersections in central Bangkok in a protracted political battle that has left Thailand rudderless. | |
| The constitutional court has backed the protest movement, saying in previous rulings that protesters, who also led a campaign to block elections, had the “right to exercise their rights and liberty.” A lower court barred the government from dispersing protesters. | The constitutional court has backed the protest movement, saying in previous rulings that protesters, who also led a campaign to block elections, had the “right to exercise their rights and liberty.” A lower court barred the government from dispersing protesters. |
| As the antigovernment movement cheered the decision to remove Ms. Yingluck, independent legal experts despaired over what they described as the crusading role of the courts and the damage to the prestige of the judiciary. | |
| The decision to remove Ms. Yingluck is “total nonsense in a democratic society,” said Ekachai Chainuvati, the deputy dean of the law faculty at Siam University in Bangkok. | The decision to remove Ms. Yingluck is “total nonsense in a democratic society,” said Ekachai Chainuvati, the deputy dean of the law faculty at Siam University in Bangkok. |
| “This is what I would call a juristocracy —a system of government governed by judges,” Mr. Ekachai said. | “This is what I would call a juristocracy —a system of government governed by judges,” Mr. Ekachai said. |
| In one of its most notorious decisions, the Constitutional Court in 2008 removed another prime minister, also from Mr. Thaksin’s political movement, because he had appeared on a televised cooking show. On Wednesday the court cited the cooking show case as precedent in its decision. | In one of its most notorious decisions, the Constitutional Court in 2008 removed another prime minister, also from Mr. Thaksin’s political movement, because he had appeared on a televised cooking show. On Wednesday the court cited the cooking show case as precedent in its decision. |
| The grounds for Ms. Yingluck’s ouster on Wednesday were that she did not give sufficient justification when, soon after coming to power in 2011, she transferred the secretary general of the National Security Council, Thawil Pliensri, to another post. | The grounds for Ms. Yingluck’s ouster on Wednesday were that she did not give sufficient justification when, soon after coming to power in 2011, she transferred the secretary general of the National Security Council, Thawil Pliensri, to another post. |
| The court said Ms. Yingluck was within her rights to remove Mr. Thawil but that the move was rushed, designed to free up another job for Ms. Yingluck’s relative, and not done according to “moral principles.” | The court said Ms. Yingluck was within her rights to remove Mr. Thawil but that the move was rushed, designed to free up another job for Ms. Yingluck’s relative, and not done according to “moral principles.” |
| In a stark symbol of the dysfunction of the Thai government, Mr. Thawil was reinstated, on court order, last week as secretary general of the National Security Council and told the Thai media that even while in office he will continue to support the movement to remove the government. Mr. Thawil, who before his reinstatement joined demonstrations calling for the overthrow of Ms. Yingluck, refused to attend his first meeting back at work, according to Thai media. | In a stark symbol of the dysfunction of the Thai government, Mr. Thawil was reinstated, on court order, last week as secretary general of the National Security Council and told the Thai media that even while in office he will continue to support the movement to remove the government. Mr. Thawil, who before his reinstatement joined demonstrations calling for the overthrow of Ms. Yingluck, refused to attend his first meeting back at work, according to Thai media. |
| The court appeared to overturn its own precedent — a similar petition against Abhisit Vejjajiva, a former prime minister and the current opposition leader, was dismissed in 2011 because Mr. Abhisit had already called for elections. Ms. Yingluck called elections in December and heads a caretaker administration. | The court appeared to overturn its own precedent — a similar petition against Abhisit Vejjajiva, a former prime minister and the current opposition leader, was dismissed in 2011 because Mr. Abhisit had already called for elections. Ms. Yingluck called elections in December and heads a caretaker administration. |
| The constitutional court has been sensitive to public criticism. When some Thai news outlets began abbreviating the name of the court with a Thai acronym, TLG, the court put out a statement requesting that the media should stop using it. In Thai, those three letters spell the word “funny.” | The constitutional court has been sensitive to public criticism. When some Thai news outlets began abbreviating the name of the court with a Thai acronym, TLG, the court put out a statement requesting that the media should stop using it. In Thai, those three letters spell the word “funny.” |