This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/20/nyregion/british-cleric-is-convicted-in-terror-trial.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
British Cleric Is Convicted in Terror Trial British Cleric Convicted Of All Terrorism Charges; Could Face Life in Prison
(about 4 hours later)
The fiery British cleric who prosecutors said had “devoted his life to violent jihad” and had dispatched young men around the world to train and fight was convicted of 11 terrorism-related charges on Monday in Manhattan. The fiery British cleric who prosecutors said had “devoted his life to violent jihad” and sent young men around the world to train and fight was convicted Monday of all 11 terrorism-related charges against him.
Prosecutors had charged that the cleric, Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, a former imam at the Finsbury Park mosque in North London, helped to orchestrate the violent 1998 kidnappings of 16 American, British and Australian tourists in Yemen; had tried to create a terrorist training camp in Bly, Ore.; and had supported terrorism by sending one of his followers to train with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Prosecutors had charged that the cleric, Mostafa Kamel Mostafa, a former imam at the Finsbury Park mosque in North London, helped to orchestrate the violent 1998 kidnappings of 16 American, British and Australian tourists in Yemen; tried to create a terrorist training camp in Bly, Ore.; and supported terrorism by sending one of his followers to train with Al Qaeda in Afghanistan.
In the tourist abductions, four hostages were killed after their captors, a militant group allied with Mr. Mostafa, used them as shields during a Yemeni rescue operation. “He jumped at opportunities across the globe to support this violent jihad,” a prosecutor, Ian McGinley, told the jury in a closing argument on Wednesday. Four hostages were killed during the kidnappings after their captors, a militant group allied with Mr. Mostafa, used them as human shields during a Yemeni rescue operation. “He jumped at opportunities across the globe to support this violent jihad,” a prosecutor, Ian McGinley, said in his summation last week.
The verdict, which came on the jury’s second day of deliberations in Federal District Court, marked the end of a lengthy legal battle to bring Mr. Mostafa to trial and convict him. Arrested in London in 2004 after the United States requested his extradition, Mr. Mostafa was tried and convicted in Britain in 2006 on separate charges, of soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred. He served a prison sentence, and after fighting extradition unsuccessfully, he was sent in 2012 to the United States to face terrorism charges in New York. The verdict came on the jury’s second day of deliberations in the sixth week of the trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan, marking the end of a long legal battle to bring Mr. Mostafa before a jury. Arrested in London in 2004 after the United States requested his extradition, Mr. Mostafa, who is also known as Abu Hamza al-Masri, was tried and convicted in Britain in 2006 on charges of soliciting murder and inciting racial hatred.
During the trial, Mr. Mostafa took the witness stand in his own defense, and testified over several days, denying that he had played a role in the kidnappings, the planning of the training camp in Oregon or that he had dispatched followers to assist Al Qaeda. After a lengthy extradition fight, he was sent to the United States in 2012 to face trial in Manhattan. He could face life in prison when Judge Katherine B. Forrest imposes his sentence on Sept. 9.
His lawyers argued that the government’s case was based on their client’s words, “not his deeds.” Prosecutors had introduced statements by Mr. Mostafa, in which he spoke approvingly of Al Qaeda’s 2000 bombing of the American destroyer Cole in Yemen, called Osama bin Laden “a hero” and said “everybody was happy when the planes hit the World Trade Center.” Mr. Mostafa, 56, testified for several days, denying he had played a role in the Yemeni kidnappings, planned the training camp in Oregon or assisted Al Qaeda.
But prosecutors tied Mr. Mostafa, 56, to the kidnappings through what they said were admissions he made in an interview with one of the rescued hostages, and records showing Mr. Mostafa had received calls on a satellite phone he had provided to the militants the day before the hostage-taking and after it was underway. Prosecutors linked him to the kidnappings through statements he had made to one of the rescued hostages, Mary Quin, who had interviewed him for a book she was writing about her experience. Ms. Quin and a second former hostage, Margaret Thompson, both United States citizens, each offered harrowing accounts of their abductions.
Mr. Mostafa’s words mattered, Mr. McGinley told the jury, because “they match his actions. They match his crimes. They’re exactly what you would expect from a man who was so proud and so public about jihad.” The government also introduced evidence that Mr. Mostafa had provided a satellite phone to the Yemeni militants who used it to communicate with him before and while the hostage- taking was underway.
The Egyptian-born Mr. Mostafa, who is also known as Abu Hamza al-Masri, could face life in prison when he is sentenced by the judge, Katherine B. Forrest of United States District Court. The government also introduced statements by Mr. Mostafa, in which he had spoken approvingly of Al Qaeda’s 2000 bombing of the American destroyer Cole in Yemen, described Osama bin Laden as “a hero” and said, “Everybody was happy when the planes hit the World Trade Center.”
Mr. Mostafa’s lawyers argued that the case against their client was based on his words and “not his deeds.”
But after the verdict, the jury foreman, Howard Bailynson, a Westchester resident who works for Xerox, said Mr. Mostafa’s “actions were clearly part of it.” Mr. Bailynson cited evidence like the satellite phone Mr. Mostafa had given to the kidnappers.
Mr. Bailynson said there was a lot of “back and forth” among jurors, who sent the judge a series of notes with questions focused on one count pertaining to the Oregon training camp.
“I feel he got a fair trial,” Mr. Bailynson said. “There’s no doubt in my mind about that.”
Preet Bharara, the United States attorney in Manhattan, said after the verdict: “The defendant stands convicted, not for what he said, but for what he did. Abu Hamza was not just a preacher of faith, but a trainer of terrorists.”
Mr. Bharara, citing several federal terrorism trials in recent years in Manhattan, including those of Mr. Mostafa and of Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, a son-in-law of Osama bin Laden who was convicted in March, said, “These trials have been difficult, but they have been fair and open and prompt.”
He said that the trials demonstrated “that in an American civilian courtroom, the American people and all the victims of terrorism can be vindicated without sacrificing our principles.”
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. added, “With each efficiently delivered guilty verdict against a top Al Qaeda-linked figure, the debate over how to best seek justice in these cases is quietly being put to rest.”
In addition to Mr. McGinley, the case was prosecuted by John P. Cronan and Edward Y. Kim.
One of Mr. Mostafa’s lawyers, Joshua L. Dratel, said his client would appeal. Mr. Dratel said that he was “disappointed not only in the verdict, but also in what appeared to be a lack of analysis by the jury.”
He said the speed of the deliberations and the jury’s “exclusive” focus on the count related to the training camp “confirms our worst fears about the impact of the volume of inflammatory rhetoric by the defendant.”
As the verdict was delivered, Mr. Mostafa appeared composed as he sat at the defense table with his lawyers, Mr. Dratel, Jeremy Schneider and Lindsay A. Lewis.
“He was prepared,” Mr. Dratel said.